Genetics and Journalism
Science writers are nearing a breakthrough, perhaps a major breakthrough, in their age-old quest to unlock the secrets, even the ultimate secrets, of cliché-free prose, researchers reported yesterday. Using cutting-edge, state-of-the-art, high-tech and other [hyphen]-laden methodologies, the science journalists sifted obscure clues to reach their tentative conclusions. ‘This is statistically significant,’ one senior researcher said. ‘It is an important step forward,’ said another. ‘This is science in action,’ they agreed.
The research was reported in Science Magazine, a prestigious journal, and in Nature too, a leading British journal. Other researchers welcomed the report, but were cautious. They called for more research.
Science writers covered all the (usual) bases, quoting John Pike of the Federation of American Scientists, climatologist Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, bioethicist Arthur Caplan, live astronomer Steve Maran, dead astronomer Carl Sagan, outspoken physicist Robert Park, and neo-Luddite anti-technology gadfly Jeremy Rifkin. Stephen Jay Gould would have added class, but was unavailable for comment.
Cliché are a window into the past, even if they are redshifted like the whistle on a passing train that changes pitch when it goes by, an analogy that itself is a window into the past. They offer a glimpse of the future, too. They add to growing evidence of the cataclysm that may have killed the inosaurs. Debate is sure to continue.
And while the latest results do not offer a cure, they point the way to better understanding of the underlying basic cellular causes to the ancient affliction.
‘We may never know all the answers but this is an important piece of the puzzle,’ said everybody (Petit, 1997).
KeywordsNews Story Science Writer Prestigious Journal Ethical Context Science Magazine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Conrad, P. (forthcoming publication), ‘Media Images, Genetics and Culture: Potential Impacts on Reporting Scientific Findings in Bioethics’, in Hoffmaster, B. and Wylie, A. (eds.), Bioethics in Context.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. and Pifer, L. (1996), ‘Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding,’ Science and Engineering Indicators—1996, National Science Board, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, chapter 7.Google Scholar
- Nelkin, D. and Lindee, M. S., (1995), The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. W. H. Freeman: New York.Google Scholar
- Petit, C, (1997), ‘Secrets of Clichés Uncovered,’ National Association of Science Writers mailing list, nasw-talk, http://nasw.org/lists/nasw-talk/hyper/old/1997/1509.html