Skip to main content

Constructing Cognitive Maps With Orientation Biases

  • Chapter
The Construction of Cognitive Maps

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 32))

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate cognitive maps constructed using different encoding processes. Different learning processes have been shown to produce cognitive maps with different characteristics. Two critical research issues are the fixed-orientation bias and the equiavailability principle. Previous research has indicated that studying a north-at-the-top cartographic map encodes a cognitive map biased in the orientation of the cartographic map. Such cognitive maps are images that have information in all parts of the map equally available. Other research has shown cognitive maps encoded by environmental navigation produced cognitive maps with no orientation bias. Subjects, however, had faster access to information in front of them than information behind them. These results suggested that exposure to a single versus multiple orientations of the spatial information explained the biases. Others have argued the two situations coincide with encoding the spatial information from secondary and primary sources. The current study considered five different learning experiences that were used to encode information about the same seven landmarks in a space. Encoding the information from three-dimensional spaces resulted in longer reaction times for an identification task. Although all learning experiences were secondary, some produced cognitive maps with orientation biases and some without. Learning experiences that provided multiple orientations eliminated an orientation bias. A single perspective oblique view learning experience appeared to produce a bias for front-back over left-right. Orientation-free higher-order cognitive maps, as described by Taylor and Tversky, could account for all these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bryant, D., Tversky, B., and Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 74–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P. and Just, M. (1986). Spatial ability: An information processing approach to psychometrics. In Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (R. Sternberg, ed.), pp. 221–252. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conerway, V. (1991). The Effects of Complexity on the Mental Rotation of Map Images. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. and Pezdek, K. (1980). Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real world distance and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N., Tversky, B., and Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models. Memory and Cognition 20, 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J., MacEachren, A., and Kotval, X. (1992). Mental image transformation in terrain map comparisons. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D., O’Dell, C, and Arndt, D. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology 13, 149–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (1984). Cognitive processes used to recognize perspective three-dimensional map surfaces. M.A. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D, Treisman, A. and Gibbs, B. (1992). The Reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 24, 175–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. (1980) Image and Mind, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. and Koenig, O. (1992). Wet Mind, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. Jankovic, I., and Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problems solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. (1982). A look at images. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 72, 532–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. (1989). Cognitive mapping: encoding and decoding information. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 79, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. (1993). Cognitive processes and cartographic maps. In Behavior and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches (T. Garling and R. Golledge, eds.), pp. 141–169. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. and Hooper, H. (1991). Urban cognitive maps: computation and structure. The Professional Geographer 43, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. and Steinke, T. (1984). Recognition of disoriented maps: the cognitive process. The Cartographic Journal 21, 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. 1987. The viewpoint consistency constraint. International Journal of Computer Vision 1, 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, A. (1992). Learning spatial information from maps: can orientation-specificity be overcome? Professional Geographer, 44, 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehrcke, P. (1986). Map Use: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation, Madison: JP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology, San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presson, C. and Hazelrigg, M. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10, 716–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presson, C, DeLange, N, and Hazelrigg, M. (1989). Orientation-specificity in spatial memory: what makes a path different from a map of a path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 887–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, K. (1990). Distorted prism maps: a recognition experiment (abstract) Cartographic Perspectives 4, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagi, D. and Julesz, B. 1985. “Where” and “what” in vision. Science, 228, 1217–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. (1978). The mental image. American Psychologist 33, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. and Cooper, L. (1983). Mental Images and Their Transformations, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. and Hurwitz, S. 1984. Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13, 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, T. and Lloyd, R. (1983). Images of maps: a rotation experiment. The Professional Geographer 35, 455–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. and Tversky, B. (1992A). Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition 20, 483–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. and Tversky, B. (1992B). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throndyke, P. and Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology 14, 560–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lloyd, R., Cammack, R. (1996). Constructing Cognitive Maps With Orientation Biases. In: Portugali, J. (eds) The Construction of Cognitive Maps. GeoJournal Library, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3949-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-33485-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics