Skip to main content

Can a Constructivist Distinguish between Experience and Representation?

  • Chapter
Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences
  • 315 Accesses

Abstract

When constructivism gives up reality as a way of accounting for representations it looses a powerful tool of explanation. Why do we have the representations we have? How are they interrelated? This article investigates what possible means a constructivistic theory has to maintain the distinction between representations and experience, between memory and imagination, and between correct and mistaken perceptions. Phenomenological qualities and coherence are the solutions advocated, but how they are combined will have an impact on what sort of constructivistic theories that can be maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Hume, D. (1739/1972) A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1777/1902) Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick, P. (ed.) The Invented Reality, How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? (Contributions to Constructivism). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1987) Siegerne Gespräche über Radikalen Konstruktivismus. In: Schmidt, S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des radikalen Konstruktivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995) Radical Constructivism, a Way of Knowing and Learning. London: The Farmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1996) Cognition=life: implications for higher-level cognition. Behavioural Processes 35:311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, A. (1997) Shaky Constructions. Lund University Cognitive Studies 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (ed.) (1984) The Invented Reality, How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? (Contributions to Constructivism). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallin, A. (1999). Can a Constructivist Distinguish between Experience and Representation?. In: Riegler, A., Peschl, M., von Stein, A. (eds) Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46286-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-29605-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics