Abstract
In his presentation James Barnes referred to the distrust between some scientists and environmentalists. In his view this had to a large extent been created by the minerals convention, which polarized relations between the two groups. For their part the environmental groups have done their best to educate Congress on matters or science. It is unfortunate that scientists themselves have not been more active in this respect. Of course the position of the environmentalists is to press for more “directed research”, which is something that scientists may not like. However there should be room for dialogue and mutual understanding. It is good that CRAMRA is gone; we are better without it — the preconditions for dialogue and mutual understanding are better now.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(1993). The Place of Science in an Environmentally Regulated Continent. In: Elzinga, A. (eds) Changing Trends in Antarctic Research. Environment and Assessment, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28849-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28849-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2267-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-28849-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive