Skip to main content

Quality Criteria for the Clinical Record

  • Chapter
Quality Assurance in Dialysis

Part of the book series: Developments in Nephrology ((DINE,volume 39))

  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Quality improvement initiatives in the clinical dialysis setting require the tracking and trending of data which can be used to identify, analyze and improve patterns of care and patterns of outcomes. Improving clinical outcomes is dependent on the availability of reliable clinical data for analysis and feedback to the renal care team. Designed properly, the dialysis facility clinical record can facilitate timely and accurate communication of patient care information to the renal care team, promote quality of service provided, and contribute to both qualitative and quantitative evaluation of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conway-Welch C. Entering a new era of quality care. ANNA J 1989; 16:469–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pollak VE, Peterson DW and Flynn J. The computer in quality control of hemodialysis patient care. QRB 1986; 202–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. West E. Designing information systems to increase quality care. Computers in Healthcare, Sept 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaiser LR. Anticipating your high tech tomorrow. Healthcare Forum, 12–20, Nov/Dec 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harbert G. A national model for ESRD patient medical records. Nephrol News Issues 1994; May:40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laffel G and Blumenthal D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. J Am Med Assoc 1989; 262Z:2869–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bednar B and Neff M. Preparing for inspection: a tool to maximize quality and minimize risk. ANNA J 1990; 17:159–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rajki KL, Feltman BA and Smeltzer CH. Assessing the quality of nursing care in a dialysis Unit. ANNA J 1985;12(1).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schyve PM and Prevost JA. From quality assurance to quality improvement. Psych Clin N Am 1990; 13:61–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McDonald JC and Newton GA. The patient flow management model: a process for quality assurance. Hlth Rec Manag 1990; 10:32–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mogli GD. Role of medical records in quality assurance program. Am Ro 1989; 30:11–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chasteen JE. For the record. Dent Assist 1987; Sept/Oct:23–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? J Am Med Assoc 1988; 260:1743–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Walton M. The Deming management method. New York: Putnum Publishing Group, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Louden TL. Customer perception counts in quality assurance. Hospitals 1989; Jan 20:84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, S., Pierpoint, K.I.M., Boyle, C.A. (1999). Quality Criteria for the Clinical Record. In: Henderson, L.W., Thuma, R.S. (eds) Quality Assurance in Dialysis. Developments in Nephrology, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28312-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28312-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5281-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-28312-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics