Abstract
We study a setting in which two channels of distribution are used by retailers for selling their merchandise. The first is the traditional channel of retail stores, which the retailers use early in the product lifecycle, and the second is an Internet-based channel, which is used by the retailers later on to reach new market segments for disposing of their excess inventories. In addition, we investigate the implications of the manufacturer’s decision to intervene by offering additional units for sale through the online channel. It is assumed that demand in the secondary market – the market that the retailers and manufacturer reach through the online channel of distribution – is mainly price driven and that the equilibrium unit price in this market is determined endogenously so as to equal demand and supply and clear the market. Thus, through their inventory replenishment decisions, the retailers and manufacturer can collectively influence future demand level and the equilibrium unit price in the secondary market. We assume a large number of retailers, an assumption that is appropriate for an Internet-based market. To simplify the analysis, we further assume that all retailers are identical. We derive the retailers’ optimal order quantity, the manufacturer’s optimal number of units to offer for sale in the secondary market, and the resulting secondary market equilibrium unit price. We show that when the retailers are the only ones to use the online channel, all entities along the supply chain benefit, including the retailers, manufacturer, and primary and secondary-market customers. Intervention in the secondary market will not always be in the manufacturer’s best interest, as it may reduce her total expected profits. Furthermore, the retailers as well as primary-market customers will always be worse off from the manufacturer’s intervention, while the secondary-market customers will always benefit from this move.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anupindi R, Bassok Y (1999) Centralization of stocks: Retailers vs. manufacturer. Management Science 45(2):178–191
Axsäter S (2003) A new decision rule for lateral transshipments in inventory systems. Management Science 49(9):1168–1179
Billington C, Lee HL, Tang CS (1998) Successful strategies for product rollovers. Sloan Management Review 39(3):23–30
Choi TM, Li D, Yan H (2004) Optimal returns policy for supply chain with e-marketplace. International Journal of Production Economics 88(2):205–227
Doctorow D, Saloner G (2000) QRS corporation. A case study. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, EC-14
Elmaghraby W (2000) Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 2(4):350–371
Eppen GD, Iyer AV (1997) Improved fashion buying with Bayesian updates. Operations Research 45(6):805–819
Esteban S, Shum M (2007) Durable-goods oligopoly with secondary markets: The case of automobiles. The RAND Journal of Economics 38(2):332–354
Grey W, Olavson T, Shi D (2005) The role of e-marketplaces in relationship-based supply chains: A survey. IBM Systems Journal 44(1):109–123
Kleindorfer PR, Wu DJ (2003) Integrating long- and short-term contracting via business-to-business exchanges for capital-intensive industries. Management Science 49(11):1597–1615
Klemperer P (1999) Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 13(3):227–286
Kouvelis P, Gutierrez GJ (1997) The newsvendor problem in a global market: Optimal centralized and decentralized control policies for a two-market stochastic inventory system. Management Science 43(5):571–585
Lee HL, Whang S (2002) The impact of the secondary market on the supply chain. Management Science 48(6):719–731
McAfee R, McMillan J (1987) Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature 25:699–738
Mendelson H, Tunca TI (2007) Strategic spot trading in supply chains. Management Science 53(5):742–759
Milner JM, Kouvelis P (2007) Inventory, speculation, and sourcing strategies in the presence of online exchanges. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 9(3):312–331
Peleg B, Lee HL, Hausman WH (2002) Short-term e-procurement strategies vs. long-term contracts. Production and Operations Management 11(4):458–479
Rosenfield DB (1989) Disposal of excess inventory. Operations Research 37(3):404–409
Rudi N, Kapur S, Pyke DF (2001) A two-location inventory model with transshipment and local decision making. Management Science 47(12):1668–1680
Sosic G (2006) Transshipment of inventories among retailers: Myopic vs. farsighted stability. Management Science 52(10):1493–1508
Taylor C (2001) They love the slump. Time Global Business B24–B25, June
Tunca TI, Zenios SA (2006) Supply auctions and relational contracts for procurement. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 8(1):43–67
Vakrat Y (2000) Online auctions. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester
Wurman PR, Walsh WE, Wellman MP (1998) Flexible double auctions for electronic commerce: theory and implementation. Decision Support Systems 24(1):17–27
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag US
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gillai, B., Lee, H.L. (2009). Internet-Based Distribution Channel for Product Diversion with Potential Manufacturer’s Intervention. In: Tang, C., Netessine, S. (eds) Consumer-Driven Demand and Operations Management Models. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 131. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98018-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-98026-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)