University Web Portals

Patterns and Policies
  • Audra Lukaitis
  • Bill Davey
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 292)

Abstract

A two-year study of Web portal use in a large university has found a number of results that can help in management decision making about the use of university Web portals as a communication channel. The study involved the collection and analysis of Web usage statistics for a business information technology school in a large city university over a two-year period. Findings initially indicate that: it is likely that some students and prospective students prefer personal contact (or face to face communication) to information provided by the portal; students use the portal mostly during critical phases in the academic calendar; students use the portal "at the last minute" or "just in time"; students are only interested in information absolutely specific to their immediate needs; students are not interested in multimedia per se. These findings should help us in improving Web portal use as a communication channel. Preliminary findings can contribute to our understandings of student information seeking behaviour and choice in the use of administrative educational information systems and communication channels.

Keywords

Web portals university administration communications channels management decision making 

References

  1. Aiken, M., J. Martin, (2003). College Student Internet Use. Campus-Wide Information System 20: 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Forgas, R. C. and Negre, J. S. (2004). The use of new technologies amongst minors in the Balearic islands. AARE Conference proceedings 2004. “Doing the public good”. Melbourne, Australia, AARE.Google Scholar
  3. Hofacker, C. F. and Murphy, J. (2000). Clickable World Wide Web banner ads and content sites. Journal of Interactive Marketing 14 (1): 49-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Huang, Shen-Cheng, Chen, Chao-Hsiu, Chen, Hsin-Liang (2004). A Case Study of Communication Channels in a Graduate Program. Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, Vol. 41, 147-155.Google Scholar
  5. Jung, J.-Y., Y.-C. Kim, et al. (2005). The influence of social environment on Internet connectedness of adolescents in Seoul, Singapore and Taipei. New Media Society 7 (1): 64-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Madell, D. and Muncer, S. (2005). Are Internet and mobile phone communication complementary activities amongst young people? A study from a ‘rational actor’ perspective. Information, Communication and Society 8 (1): 64-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nielsen NetRatings, Average Web Usage Month of March, 2002 U.S., 2002a, http://pm.netratings.com/nnpm/owa/NRpublicreports.usagemonthly
  8. Nielsen NetRatings, February 2002 Global Internet Index Average Usage, February 2002b, http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/hot_off_the_net_ i.jsp RMIT University Web Style Guide 3.0 (Staff log-in required).
  9. Sherry, C. A. and K. A. Fielden (2005). The millennials: Computer savvy (or not?). HERDSA.Google Scholar
  10. Smoreda, Z. & Thomas, F. (2001). “Social networks and residential ICT adoption and use”, Eurescom Summit 2001 (3G Technicoliges & Application), Heidelberg 12-15 Nov. 2001.Google Scholar
  11. Spenneman, Dirk H. R.(2007). Learning and teaching 24/7: daily internet usage patterns at nine Australian universities. Campus-Wide Information Systems Vol. 24 No. 1, 27-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Suryani, A. (2007). Exploring new media usage among Indonesian students in Australian universities. 2007 ISANA International Conference “Student success in international education”. Stamford Grand, Glenelg, Adelaide, Australia, ISANA.Google Scholar
  13. Tarafdar, M. and J. Zhang (2008). Determinants of reach and loyalty - a study of Website performance and implications for Website design.Journal of Computer Information Systems, 16. Google Scholar
  14. Uçak, N. Ö. (2007). Internet Use Habits of Students of the Department of Information Management, Hacettepe University, Ankara. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33(6): 697-707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Audra Lukaitis
    • 1
  • Bill Davey
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business Information TechnologyRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations