Advertisement

The Future of School Performance Feedback Systems

Conference Discussion Group Paper
  • Don Passey
  • Andreas Breiter
  • Adrie Visscher
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 292)

Abstract

This paper introduces a simple categorisation of school performance feedback systems. It explores how a cross-national review of systems in each category, using a number of selected criteria, can identify features that warrant development, if user accessibility is to be enhanced in the future. The paper indicates potential value to be gained from both a deeper and a wider crossnational study.

Keywords

School performance feedback systems school performance pupil performance and monitoring future developments 

References

  1. Coe, R. and Visscher, A. (2002). In A.J. Visscher and R. Coe (Eds.). School improvement through performance feedback. Routledge: AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  2. Hendriks, M.A., Doolaard, S. and Bosker, R.J. (2002). In A.J. Visscher and R. Coe (Eds.). School improvement through performance feedback. Routledge: AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  3. Hosenfeld, I., Koch, U., Groß Ophoff, J. and Scherthan, F. (2008). Projekt VERA: Ergebnisorientierte Unterrichtsentwicklung durch internetgestützte externe Evaluation? In A. Breiter, A. Lange and E. Stauke (Eds.). Schulinformationssysteme und datengestützte Entscheidungsprozesse. Peter Lang: BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. DfES and Ofsted (2004). A New Relationship with Schools: Improving Performance through School Self Evaluation. DfES: NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  5. Passey, D. (2008). First no choice, then some choice, and finally overload: A reasonable data management evolution? In A. Tatnall and Davey, B. (2008). (Eds.). Evolution of Information Technology in Educational Management. Springer: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Schrader, F.-W., Helmke, A. and Hosenfeld, I. (2008). Stichwort: Kompeten-zentwicklung im Grundschulalter. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 11(1), 7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stern, C., Ebel, C. and Müncher, A. (Eds.). (2008). Bessere Qualität in allen Schulen. Praxisleitfaden zur Einführung des Selbstevaluationsinstruments SEIS in Schulen, 3. vollständing überarbeitete Auflage. Bertelsmann Stiftung: GüterslohGoogle Scholar
  8. Vlug, K.F.M. (1997). Because every pupil counts: the success of the pupil monitoring system in the Netherlands. Education and Information Technologies, 2(4), 287–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don Passey
    • 1
  • Andreas Breiter
    • 2
  • Adrie Visscher
    • 3
  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.University of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations