Skip to main content

A Review of China’s Financial System and Initiatives for the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China’s Emerging Financial Markets

Abstract

We provide a comprehensive review of China’s financial system and explore directions of future development. First, the current financial system is dominated by a large banking sector. In recent years, banks have made considerable progress in reducing the amount of non-performing loans and improving their efficiency. It is important that these efforts are continued. Second, the role of the stock market in allocating resources in the economy has been limited and ineffective. Further development of China’s stock market and other financial markets is the most important task in the long term. Third, the most successful part of the financial system, in terms of supporting the growth of the overall economy, is a non-standard sector that consists of alternative financing channels, governance mechanisms, and institutions. This sector should co-exist with banks and markets in the future in order to continue to support the growth of the Hybrid Sector (non-state, non-listed firms). Finally, in order to sustain stable economic growth, China should aim to prevent and halt damaging financial crises, including a banking sector crisis, a real estate or stock market crash, and a “twin crisis” in the currency market and banking sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Hybrid Sector comprises all the firms that are not state-owned or publicly listed, and more specifically, it includes the following types of firms: (1) privately owned companies (but not publicly listed and traded); controlling owners can be Chinese citizens, investors (or companies) from Taiwan or Hong Kong, or foreign investors (or companies); (2) collectively and jointly owned companies, where joint ownership among local government, communities, employees, and institutions is forged.

  2. 2.

    For more descriptions of the pre-1949 history of China’s financial system, see a companion paper of this chapter, AQQ (2005b); for more anecdotal evidence on the development of China’s financial system in the same period, see, for example, Kirby (1995) and Lee (1993).

  3. 3.

    BOC, among the oldest banks currently in operation, was originally established in 1912 as a private bank and specialized in foreign currency-related transactions.

  4. 4.

    At the end of 2007, the total market capitalization of the two domestic exchanges (SHSE and SZSE) is around $4.5 trillion, whereas total investment in the real estate market is around $2.53 trillion.

  5. 5.

    While there is a nationwide, government-run pension system (financed mainly through taxes on employers and employees), the coverage ratio of the pension system varies significantly across regions and is particularly low in rural areas. Moreover, there is a very limited amount of capital in individual accounts, and most of the capital has been invested in banks and government projects with low returns. See, for example, Feldstein (1999, 2003) and Feldstein and Liebman (2006), for more details on China’s pension system.

  6. 6.

    If we look at total bank credit, including loans to state sectors, the ratio of China’s bank credit to GDP rises to 1.10, higher than even the German-origin countries (with a weighted average of 1.06). The difference between total bank credit and private credit suggests that most of the bank credit is issued to companies that are ultimately owned by the state.

  7. 7.

    La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes and Shleifer (2002) show that the government owned 99.45% of the assets of the 10 largest commercial banks in China in 1995, one of the highest in their sample of 92 countries. Moreover, their result on the negative relationship between government ownership of banks and the growth of a country’s economy seems to apply to China’s State Sector and the banking sector. However, we show that the high government ownership of banks has not slowed down the growth of the Hybrid Sector.

  8. 8.

    Consistent with this view, Lardy (1998) argues that, if using international standards on bad loans, the existing NPLs within China’s state-owned banks as of the mid-1990s would make these banks’ total net worth negative, so that the entire network of state banks would be insolvent.

  9. 9.

    See, for example, Perkins and Rawski (2008) for a review and projections on the prospects of long-running economic growth and statistics in China.

  10. 10.

    The sale of tranches of securitized NPLs to foreign investors first occurred in 2002. The deal was struck between Huarong, one of the four AMCs, and a consortium of US investment banks led by Morgan Stanley (and including Lehman Brothers and Salomon Smith Barney) and was approved by the Chinese government in early 2003 (Financial Times, 05/2003).

  11. 11.

    A few foreign lenders (e.g., GM and Ford) were approved to enter China’s auto loan market by forming joint ventures with Chinese automakers (Financial Times, 05/27/2005).

  12. 12.

    For example, Park et al. (2003) find that competition among banks and intermediaries leads to better effort of the banks (especially state-owned banks) and better loan decisions in China’s rural areas.

  13. 13.

    Postal savings (deposit-taking institutions affiliated with local post offices) is another form of non-bank intermediation that is not reported in Table 4B due to lack of time series data. However, at the end of 1999, total deposits within the postal savings system exceeded RMB 380 billion, or 6.4% of all deposits in China.

  14. 14.

    An example is Guangxia Industry Co., Ltd., dubbed as “China’s Enron.” Located in Ningxia Province, one of the poorest areas of China, Guangxia was listed on the SZSE in 1994 as a manufacturer of floppy disks. After experiencing poor performance for the first five years, the company reported unprecedented high EPS (earnings per share) at the end of 1999 and claimed that they had mastered the techniques of CO2 fluid extraction. The company’s stock price shot up from RMB 14 to 76 in one year. A CSRC investigation later revealed that the reported earnings and sales records were fabricated, and the company continued losing money in their original line of businesses. The company’s top executives were criminally charged, and its auditors lost their licenses, while shareholders’ lawsuits were eventually processed by courts for the first time in China. For more details on this case and other cases, see, for example, AQQ (2005b).

  15. 15.

    For example, Du et al. (2008) find that many private, non-listed firms use acquisition of blocks of shares of listed firms as a means to gain access to financial markets (without improving operating performance), as indicated by the frequent fundraising activities such as SEO followed acquisition.

  16. 16.

    During most of the period 1988–2003, Moody’s rated China’s government bonds (foreign currency) A2 or A3 (lower than Aa3 and A1 but higher than Baa1; highest rating is Aaa) with a “positive” or “stable” outlook, while the rating on bank deposits (foreign currency ceilings) was Baa, at or above the “investment” grade. These ratings are better or comparable than Moody’s ratings on government bonds from most emerging economies.

  17. 17.

    Explanations of the B share discount include (1) Foreign investors face higher information asymmetry than domestic investors, (2) lower B share prices compensation for the lack of liquidity (due to low trading volume), and (3) the A share premium reflects a speculative bubble component among domestic investors. See Chan et al. (2007) and Mei et al. (2003) for more details.

  18. 18.

    If we include the cross-border M&As and transactions between parent companies and subsidiaries, the total amount increases to US$47 billion in 2000, $14 billion in 2001, $29 billion in 2002, and $24 billion in the first three quarters of 2003. Sixty-eight percent of all M&A deals (66% in terms of dollar deal amount) are initiated by Hybrid Sector firms, while former SOEs and foreign firms initiate 29 and 3% of the rest, respectively (27 and 7% in deal amount). M&As are most active in coastal regions, and in industries such as machinery, information technology, retail, and gas and oil.

  19. 19.

    Cross-country information on the efficiency of bankruptcy procedures, based on surveys of lawyers and bankruptcy judges around the world, is available from World Bank (http://rru.worldbank.org/Doingbusiness). Among 108 countries, China’s “goals of insolvency” index is equal to the median of the sample.

  20. 20.

    With a large sample of syndicated loans around the globe, Qian and Strahan (2007) show that strong creditor protection (in borrower countries) enhances loan availability as lenders are more willing to provide credit on favorable terms (e.g., longer maturities and lower interest rates).

  21. 21.

    Gordon and Li (2003) show that the ownership structure (with large state ownership stakes) can be attributed to government collecting monopoly rents from investors and subsidizing listed firms that were formerly SOEs. However, they argue that this behavior is not as efficient as explicit taxes on investors.

  22. 22.

    Huang et al. (2008) document that share reform increases turnovers, especially for firms with low liquidity prior to the reform, and reduces speculative trading. Although share prices drop significantly on the day share supply increases, shareholder wealth increases by 15% overall. Beltratti and Bortolotti (2006) document 8% abnormal return around the date of share reform announcement. Liao and Liu (2008) show that market reactions to share reforms are positively associated with the quality of the listed firms (as measured by firm disclosure), providing evidence of improved market efficiency.

  23. 23.

    All firms, including Hybrid Sector firms, must disclose accounting and financial information to the local Bureau of Commerce and Industry, and most of the reports are audited. However, these data are then aggregated into the Statistical Yearbook without any firm-level publications.

  24. 24.

    Due to data limitations, our calculations underestimate the output of the State and Listed Sectors. We use the output produced by SOEs and listed firms in which the state has at least a 50% ownership stake as the total output for these sectors, but this calculation excludes output from listed firms that are not majority-owned by the state; the output for the Hybrid Sector is the difference between the total output and the total for the other two sectors. However, as mentioned above, only around 20% of all listed firms do not have the state as the largest owner, hence the total output of these firms is not likely to change our overall conclusion on the dominance of the Hybrid Sector over the other two sectors.

  25. 25.

    There is an ongoing process of privatizing SOEs. Potentially this may bias the growth rate of the Hybrid Sector higher, as there are firms shifting from the State Sector to the Hybrid Sector. However, the overwhelming majority of SOEs are transformed into the Listed Sector (the main channel through which SOEs were partially privatized prior to 2004); thus this process is unlikely to change the validity of the results above.

  26. 26.

    Our calculations of the total number of workers employed by the Hybrid Sector actually underestimate the actual work force in the sector, because the Statistics Yearbooks do not provide employment data for all types of firms (by ownership structure) in the Hybrid Sector.

  27. 27.

    Interestingly, the same survey, used in LLSV (1997b), finds that Chinese citizens have a low tendency to participate in civil activities. However, our evidence shows that, with effective alternative mechanisms in place citizens in the developed regions of China have a strong incentive to participate in business/economic activities.

  28. 28.

    Another effective solution for corruption is the common goal of sharing high prospective profits, which aligns interests of government officials with those of entrepreneurs and investors. Under this common goal in a multi-period setting, implicit contractual agreements and reputation can act as enforcement mechanisms to ensure that all parties, including government officials, fulfill their roles to make the firm successful.

  29. 29.

    A frequently talked about and controversial topic is intellectual property rights, including patents and copyrights. The practice of enforcing intellectual property rights by courts is much more vigilant and prevalent in developed countries than in developing countries such as China. An extensive literature in economics has found mixed evidence on the relationship between patent/copyright protection and the pace of innovations. While exclusive property rights provide strong incentives for innovations and do lead to more innovations in a few industries such as chemicals and pharmaceuticals, excessive protection deters competition, which is another important factor in spurring innovations.

  30. 30.

    A good example is the US payment system. At the beginning of the twenty-first century the US had a nineteenth-century system: Checks had to be physically transported from where they were deposited to a central operations center, then to the clearer and then back to the banks they were drawn on. Despite repeated calls for changes from the banks and businesses, the US Congress did not act on this simple yet costly problem, until September 11, 2001. After the terrorist attack all commercial flights in the were grounded for several days, completely halting the check-clearing process. The check clearing for the 21st Century Act was signed in October 2003, allowing electronic images to be a substitute for the original checks, and thus the clearing process is no longer dependent on the mail and transportation system.

  31. 31.

    Chang and Velasco (2001) develop a model of twin crisis based on the Diamond and Dybvig (1983) model of bank runs. Money enters agents’ utility function, and the central bank controls the ratio of currency to consumption. In some regimes, there exists both a “good” equilibrium in which early (late) consumers receive the proceeds from short-term (long-term) assets and a “bad” equilibrium in which everybody believes a crisis will occur, and these beliefs are self-fulfilling. If the bad equilibrium occurs, there is a twin crisis.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron and Simon Johnson, 2005. “Unbundling Institutions,” Journal of Political Economy 113(5), 949–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessandria, George, and Jun Qian, 2005. “Endogenous Financial Intermediation and Real Effects of Capital Account Liberalization,” Journal of International Economics 67, 97–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 1999. “Diversity of Opinion and Financing of New Technologies,” Journal of Financial Intermediation 8, 68–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 2000a. Comparing Financial Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 2000b. “Corporate Governance and Competition,” in Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Xavier Vives, Ed., Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 23–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 2000c. “Bubbles and Crises,” Economic Journal 110, 236–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 2000d. “Financial Contagion,” Journal of Political Economy 108, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 2004a, “Financial Intermediaries and Markets” (with D. Gale), Econometrica 72, 1023–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 2004b, “Financial Fragility, Liquidity and Asset Prices” (with D. Gale), Journal of the European Economic Association 2, 1015–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale, 2007, Understanding Financial Crises, Clarendon Lectures in Finance, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Hiroko Oura, 2004. “Sustained Economic Growth and the Financial System,” Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, 22(S-1), 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Jun Qian, 2007.“Corruption and Competition,” working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, and Jun Qian, 2008.“Comparing Legal and Alternative Institutions in Commerce,” working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, Michael Chui, and Angela Maddaloni, 2004. “Financial Systems in Europe, the USA, and Asia,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20, 490–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, 2005a. “Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China,” Journal of Financial Economics 77, 57–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, 2005b. “China’s Financial System: Past, Present, and Future,” Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper No. 05-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, 2008a. “China’s Financial System: Past, Present, and Future,” Chapter 14 in China’s Great Economic Transformation, L. Brandt and T. Rawski, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, Jun Qian, and Mengxin Zhao, 2008b. “ICBC’s IPO and the Reform of China’s Banking Sector,” working paper, Wharton Financial Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, Rajesh Chakrabarti, Sankar De, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, 2008c. “The Financial System Capacities of China and India,” working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltratti, Andrea and Bernardo Bortolotti, 2006. “The Nontradable Share Reform in the Chinese Stock Market,” Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Note di Lavoro Series Index, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen, Iftekhar Hasan, and Mingming Zhou, 2006. “Bank Ownership and Efficiency in China: What will Happen in the World’s Largest Nation?”, Journal of Banking and Finance (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Bernard S., and Ronald J. Gilson, 1998. “Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Bank versus Stock Markets,” Journal of Financial Economics 47, 243–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Loren, and Xiaodong Zhu, 2000. “Redistribution in a Decentralized Economy: Growth and Inflation in China under Reform,” Journal of Political Economy 108, 422–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, Mike, Fausto Panunzi, and Andrei Shleifer, 2003. “Family Firms,” Journal of Finance 58, 2167–2201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, Mike, Tore Elligensen, and Mariassunta Giannetti, 2007. “What You Sell is What you Lend? Explaining Trade Credits Contracts,” Review of Financial Studies (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Yingxue, 2008. Ph.D. dissertation, Tsinghua University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Kalok, Albert Menkveld, and Zhishu Yang, 2007. “Information Asymmetry and Asset Prices: Evidence from the China Foreign Share Discount,” Journal of Finance (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Roberto, and Andres Velasco, 2001. “A Model of Financial Crises in Emerging Markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 489–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che, Jiahua, and Yingyi Qian, 1998. “Insecure Property Rights and Government Ownership of Firms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 467–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes, Rodrigo, Gianluigi Ferrucci, and Hyun Song Shin, 2005, “Liquidity Risk and Contagion,” Journal of the European Economic Association 3, 556–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, Stijn, Simeon Djankov, and Larry Lang, 2000. “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations,” Journal of Financial Economics 58, 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, Stijn, Simeon Djankov, Joseph Fan, and Larry Lang, 2002. “Expropriation of Minority Shareholders in East Asia,” Journal of Finance 57, 2741–2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Donald, Peter Murrell, and Susan Whiting, 2008. “Law, Property Rights and Institutions,” Chapter 11 in China’s Great Economic Transformation, L. Brandt and T. Rawski, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, Robert, and Colin Xu, 2005. “Institutions, Ownership, and Finance: The Determinants of Reinvestments of Profit among Chinese Firms,” Journal of Financial Economics 77, 117–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, and Ross Levine, 2001. Financial Structure and Economic Growth: Cross-country Comparisons of Banks, Markets, and Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Douglas, and Philip Dybvig, 1983. “Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity,” Journal of Political Economy 91, 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, Simeon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer, 2002. “The Regulation of Entry,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, David, and Shang-jin Wei, 2007. “Das (Wasted) Kapital: Firm Ownership and Investment Efficiency in China,” working paper, IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, 1998. “Capital Controls: An Idea Whose Time is Past,” Princeton Essays in International Finance No. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, Julan, Oliver Rui, and Sonia Wong, 2008. “Financing Motivated Takeovers: The Case of China,” working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Joseph, Oliver Rui, and Mengxin Zhao, 2006. “Rent Seeking and Corporate Finance: Evidence from Corruption,” working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Joseph, T.J. Wong, and Tianyu Zhang, 2007. “Politically-connected CEOs, Corporate Governance and Post-IPO Performance of China’s Partially Privatized Firms,” Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin, 1999. “Social Security Pension Reform in China,” China Economic Review 10, 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin, 2003. “Banking, Budgets, and Pensions: Some Priorities for Chinese Policy,” mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin, and Jeffrey Liebman, 2006. “Realizing the Potential of China’s Social Security Pension System,” China Economic Review 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Lei, and Mark Seasholes, 2004. “Correlated Trading and Location,” Journal of Finance 59, 2117–2144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Stanley. 1998. “Capital Account Liberalization and the Role of the IMF,” Princeton Essays on International Finance No. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Julian, Colin Mayer, and Stefano Rossi, 2003. “Ownership: Evolution and Regulation,” working paper, London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Peter, Michael Firth, and Oliver Rui, 2003. “Corporate Governance and CEO Compensation in China,” working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Roger, and Wei Li, 2003. “Government as Discriminating Monopolist in the Financial Market: The Case of China,” Journal of Public Economics 87, 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Avner, 1989. “Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders,” Journal of Economic History 49, 857–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Avner, 1993. “Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition,” American Economic Review 83, 525–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, Richard, and Nathporn Chatusripitak, 2000. “The Case of the Missing Market: The Bond Market and Why it Matters for Financial Development,” working paper, Wharton Financial Institutions Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggarth, Glenn, Ricardo Reis, and Victoria Saporta, 2002. “Costs of Banking System Instability: Some Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 825–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, Leslie A., and Philippe C. Wells, 2000. “The Determinants of Venture Capital Funding: Evidence across Countries,” Journal of Corporate Finance 6, 241–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael, and William Meckling, 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen Reinhart, 1999. “The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-payments Problems,” American Economic Review 89, 473–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, Edward, 1989. The S&L Mess: How Did It Happen? The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, Edward, 2003. “What Economic Principles Should Policymakers in Other Countries Have Learned from the S&L Mess?” Business Economics 38, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, Takao, and Cheryl Long, 2004. “Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance in China,” William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, William, 1995. “China Unincorporated: Company Law and Business Enterprise in Twentieth-Century China,” Journal of Asian Studies 54, 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortum, Samuel, and Josh Lerner, 2000. “Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital on Innovation,” RAND Journal of Economics 31, 674–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1997a. “Legal Determinants of External Finance,” Journal of Finance 52, 1131–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1997b. “Trust in Large Organizations,” American Economic Review 87, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1998, “Law and Finance,” Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1999. “The Quality of Government,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15, 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 2000a, “Investor Protection and Corporate Governance,” Journal of Financial Economics 58, 141–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 2000b, “Agency Problems and Dividend Policy around the World,” Journal of Finance 55, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer, 2002. “Government Ownership of Banks,” Journal of Finance 57, 265–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 2002. “Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation,” Journal of Finance 57, 1147–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer, 2006. “What Works in Securities Laws?” Journal of Finance 61, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lardy, Nicholas R., 1998. China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Lawrence, Yingyi Qian, and Gerard Roland, 2000. “Reform without Losers: An Interpretation of China’s Dual-Track Approach to Transition,” Journal of Political Economy 108, 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Tahirih V., 1993. “Risky Business: Courts, Culture, and the Marketplace,” University of Miami Law Review 47, 1335–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Ross, 2002. “Bank-based or Market-based Financial Systems: Which is Better?” Journal of Financial Intermediation 11, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, David, 1996. “A Theory of Ambiguous Property Rights: The Case of the Chinese Non-state Sector,” Journal of Comparative Economics 23, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, David, 1998. “Changing Incentives of the Chinese Bureaucracy,” American Economic Review 88, 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Kai, Heng Yue, and Longkai Zhao, 2007. “Ownership, Institutions, and Capital Structure: Evidence from Non-listed Chinese Firms,” working paper, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Li, and Bibo Liu, 2008. “Moral Hazard, Information Disclosure and Market Efficiency: Evidence from China’s Share Reform,” working paper, Tsinghua University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, Carl-Johan, Gillian Garcia, and Matthew I. Saal, 1996. Bank Soundness and Macroeconomic Policy, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Qiao, 2007. “Institutions, Financial Development, and Corporate Investment: Evidence from an Implied Return on Capital in China,” working paper, University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, Ronald I., 1991. The Order of Economic Liberalization, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, John, 1995. “China’s Nonconformist Reform,” Economic Transition in Eastern Europe and Russia: Realities of Reform, Edward Lazear, Ed., Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, pp. 419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, John, 1997. “Markets in Transition,” Chapter 6 in Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Vol. 2, David M. Kreps and Kenneth F. Wallis, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 210–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, John, and Barry Naughton, 1992. “How to Reform a Planned Economy: Lessons from China,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 8, 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei, Jianping, Jose Scheinkman, and Wei Xiong, 2003. “Speculative Trading and Stock Prices: An Analysis of Chinese A-B Share Premia,” working paper, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, Ranald C, 1987. The London and New York Stock Exchanges 1850–1914, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, Randall, Bernard Yeung, and Wayne Yu, 2000. “The Information Content of Stock Markets: Why do Emerging Markets Have Synchronous Stock Price Movement?” Journal of Financial Economics 58, 215–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orts, Eric, 2001. “The Rule of Law in China,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transitional Law 34, 43–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Albert, Loren Brandt, and John Giles, 2003. “Competition under Credit Rationing: Theory and Evidence from Rural China,” Journal of Development Economics 71, 463–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Dwight, and Thomas Rawski, 2008. “Forecasting China’s Economic Growth to 2025,” Chapter 20 in China’s Great Economic Transformation, L. Brandt and T. Rawski, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, Eswar, and Shang-Jin Wei, 2005. “The Chinese Approach to Capital Flows: Patterns and Possible Explanations,” in Capital Controls and Capital Flows in Emerging Economies, Sebastian Edwards, Ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Jun, and Philip Strahan, 2007. “How Laws and Institutions Shape Financial Contracts: The Case of Bank Loans,” Journal of Finance 62, 2803–2834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Yuemin, Bing Li, and Youcai Cai, 2000. “Losses of State-Owned Commercial Banks: Reasons and Policy Response,” Jingji gongzuozhe xuexi ziliao [Study Materials for Economic Workers], no. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, Raghuram, and Luigi Zingales, 2003a. “The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century,” Journal of Financial Economics 69, 5–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, Raghuram, and Luigi Zingales, 2003b. Saving Capitalism from Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranciere, Romain, Aaron Tornell, and Frank Westermann, 2003. “Crises and Growth: A Re-evaluation,” NBER Working Paper 10073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipani, Cindy, and Junhai Liu, 2002. “Corporate Governance in China: Then and Now,” Columbia Business Law Review, Vol. 2002, 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, Rene, and Rohan Williamson, 2003. “Culture, Openness, and Finance,” Journal of Financial Economics 70, 261–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Kellee, 2002. Back-alley Banking, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Bibo Liu and Zhenrui Tang for their excellent research assistance, Yingxue Cao for sharing data and information on China’s real estate markets, and Boston College and the Wharton Financial Institutions Center for financial support. The authors are responsible for the remaining errors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franklin Allen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allen, F., Qian, J.“., Qian, M., Zhao, M. (2009). A Review of China’s Financial System and Initiatives for the Future. In: Barth, J., Tatom, J., Yago, G. (eds) China’s Emerging Financial Markets. The Milken Institute Series on Financial Innovation and Economic Growth, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93769-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics