Abstract
Opioid receptors and endogenous opioid peptides play a role in a wide variety of behavioral and physiological processes. Four types of opioid receptors have been identified: mu (MOR), delta (DOR), kappa (KOP), and opioid-receptor-like receptor (ORL-1). A variety of endogenous opioids have been identified, including β-endorphin, met-enkephalin, dynorphins, and nociceptin, among others. Whereas endogenous opioids are relatively nonselective, several receptor-selective compounds are available for research purposes (e.g., DAMGO, DPDPE, and U50,488H selectively agonize MOR, DOR, and KOR, respectively). This has permitted researchers to identify the role played by specific opioid receptors in incentive processes. A brief overview of opioid receptors and neuropeptides is followed by a review of recent research on their role in modulating absolute and relative incentive value. Incentive value refers to the hedonic dimension of stimuli such as food and fluids, i.e., to their appetitive or aversive value. Opioid release is involved in two major functions related to incentive value. First, they influence food palatability and so-called liking orofacial responses. Second, they are implicated in the behavioral adjustment to situations involving unexpected incentive devaluations. Opioid function in these situations is surprisingly selective. Thus, for example, different opioid receptors affect behavior at different points in the process of adjustment to reward devaluation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- cE:
-
Consummatory extinction
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- cSNC:
-
Consummatory successive negative contrast
- DOR:
-
Delta opioid receptor
- EFF:
-
Escape from frustration
- iE:
-
Instrumental extinction (operant lever pressing)
- iSNC:
-
Instrumental successive negative contrast
- KOR:
-
Kappa opioid receptor
- MOR:
-
Mu opioid receptor
- ORL-1:
-
Opioid-receptor-like receptor
- pE:
-
Pavlovian extinction (autoshaped lever pressing)
References
Aubert I, Guigoni C, Li Q, Dovero S, Bioulac BH, Gross CE, Crossman AR, Bloch B, Bezard E Biol Psych. 2007;61:836–44.
Berridge KC. Physiol Behav. 2004;81:179–209.
Bodnar RJ Peptides. in press.
Craig W. Biol Bull. 1918;34:91–107.
Daniel AM, Ortega LA, Papini MR Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92:439–50.
Dreborg S, Sundström G, Larsson TA, Larhammar D Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:15487–92.
Drews E, Zimmer A. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;90:1–5.
Flaherty CF. Incentive relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
Gomes I, Gupta A, Filipovska J, Szeto HH, Pintar JE, Devi LA. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:5135–9.
Hayward MD, Schaich-Borg A, Pintar JE, Low MJ Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006;85:601–11.
Kirkham TC, Cooper SJ Physiol Behav. 1988;44:491–4.
Klepstad P. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2007;18:149–56.
Levine AS, Murray SS, Kneip J, Grace M, Morley JE Physiol Behav. 1982;28:23–5.
Levine AS, Weldon DT, Grace M, Cleary JP, Billington CJ. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:R248–52.
Lord JA, Waterfield AA, Hughes J, Kosterlitz HW Nature. 1977;267:495–9.
Lynch WC, Clark S Life Sci. 1983;32:2801–7.
Mansour A, Fox CA, Akil H, TINS. 1995;18:22–9.
Mayer P, Höllt V. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;91:167–77.
Norris JN, Daniel AM, Papini MR Learn Motiv. 2008;39:296–312.
Norris JN, Perez-Acosta AM, Ortega LA, Papini MR Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009;94:81–7.
Papini MR. Int J Comp Psychol. 2009;22:170–87.
Papini MR, Pellegrini S Learn Motiv. 2006;37:357–78.
Peciña S, Berridge KC J Neurosci. 2005;25:11777–86.
Pellegrini S, Wood M, Daniel A, Papini MR Behav Brain Res. 2005;164:239–49.
Raffin-Sanson ML, Keyzer Y, Bertagna X Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;149:79–90.
Rockwood GA, Reid LD Physiol Behav. 1982;29:1175–8.
Rowan GA, Flaherty CF Psychopharmacology. 1987;93:51–8.
Sim-Selley LJ, Vogt LJ, Childers SR, Vogt BA Neuropharmacology. 2003;45:220–30.
Smith KS, Tindellb AJ, Aldridge JW, Berridge KC Behav Brain Res. 2009;196:155–67.
Snook LA, Milligan G, Kieffer BL, Massotte D J Neurochem. 2008;105:865–73.
Stevens CW. Front Biosci. 2009;14:1247–69.
Stevens CW, Brasel CM, Mohan S Neurosci Lett. 2007;419:189–94.
Wood MD, Daniel AM, Papini MR Behav Neurosci. 2005;119:446–54
Wood MD, Norris JN, Daniel AM, Papini MR Behav Brain Res. 2008;193:28–36.
Yaster M, Kost-Byerly S, Maxwell LG In: Schechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, editors. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 181–224.
Zimprich A, Simon T, Höllt V FEBS Lett. 1995;359:142–6.
Acknowledgements
Preparation of this article was partially supported grants from the TCU Research and Creative Activities fund and the TCU Science and Engineering Research Center. The authors thank Jacob Norris for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Papini, M.R., Ortega, L.A. (2011). Endogenous Opioids, Opioid Receptors, and Incentive Processes. In: Preedy, V., Watson, R., Martin, C. (eds) Handbook of Behavior, Food and Nutrition. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-92270-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-92271-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)