Skip to main content

The Early European “Federalism ”: Ambiguities of Talks About How to Walk Toward a Political Union

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 755 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Public Choice ((SIPC,volume 15))

Abstract

The European institutions constitute an incomplete – as incomplete as any constitutional contract – agency contract. Incompleteness means that the agents, the European institutions, benefit from important asymmetries of information and therefore behave as their own principal. They do not behave as they are told to but choose their own objectives and means of action. In this chapter, we analyze the historical origins of such incompleteness. We show that it results from, and as a consequence, is reinforced by the hesitations of the founders of the European institutions about the nature of a European federation . These ambiguities are crucial for a double reason: not only do they influence the nature of the tasks delegated to the European institutions but they also impact the way they can be controlled. We analyze a set ofdiscourses and official texts and show that the term “federal” bears various meanings, ranging from centralized federalism to decentralized confederalism .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bebr, G. 1955. The European Defense Community and the Western European Union: An Agonizing Dilemma. Stanford Law Review 7(2): 169–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, H. W. 1954. The Proposed European Political Community . American Journal of International Law 48(1): 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 1952. International Organisation 6(4): 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 1953. International Organisation 7(1): 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, C. G. 1952. Treaty Establishing the European Defense Community . American Journal of International Law 46(4): 698–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberler, G. 1949. Economic Aspects of the European Union. World Politics 1(4): 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josselin, J.-M. and A. Marciano. 2000. Displacing Your Principal: Two Case Studies of Some Interest for the Constitutional Future of Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics 10(3): 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josselin, J.-M. and A. Marciano. 2007. How the Court Made a Federation of the EU. Review of International Organisations 2(1): 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, U. 1960. Europe: The Six and the Seven. International Organisation 14(1): 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, J. L. 1952. Supra-National Organs. American Journal of International Law 46(4): 690–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, J. L. 1953. Treaty Establishing the European Defense Community . American Journal of International Law 47(2): 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, L.. 1953. Little Europe and Britain. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs) 29(3): 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, K. 1952. The Union of Western Europe: Illusion and Reality. I. An Appraisal of the Methods. Columbia Law Review 52(1): 55–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangone, G. J. 1957. Review of “The Council of Europe: Its Structure, Functions, and Achievements” by A. H. Robertson. American Political Science Review 51(3): 850–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, J. 1976. Mémoires. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. H. 1954a. The Council of Europe, 1949–1953: I. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 3(2): 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. H. 1954b. Different Approaches to European Unity. American Journal of Comparative Law 3(4): 502–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, F. L. 1951. The Council of Europe. American Political Science Review 45(3): 724–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaak, P-H. 1952. Europe in a Western Community. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 282: 45–52 (The National Interest-Alone or with Others?).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaak, P.-H. 1953. Speech Made When Handing Over the Draft Statute of the European Political Community to the Six Ministers for Foreign Affairs on Monday, March 9, 1953 in Draft Treaty Embodying The Statute of The European Community. Information and Official Documents Published by the Secretariat of The Constitutional Committee, Paris: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. 1999. Explaining Constitutional Change. A Positive Economics Approach. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Brentano, H. 1953. Speech Made When Handing Over the Draft Statute of the European Political Community to the Six Ministers for Foreign Affairs on Monday, March 9, 1953 in Draft Treaty Embodying The Statute of The European Community. Information and Official Documents Published by the Secretariat of The Constitutional Committee, Paris: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalem, R. J. 1959. Prospects for European Political Unification. Western Political Quarterly (Part 1) 12(1): 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Other Bibliographical Sources

Download references

Acknowledgment

A first version of this chapter was presented at a conference in Quebec City (Do They Walk Like They Talk? The political economy of speech and action in policy processes) and at the European Workshop in Law and Economics (Erfurt, April 2008). We thank the participants for their comments. We also thank Louis Imbeau for having given us the opportunity to prepare and present this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Michel Josselin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Josselin, JM., Marciano, A. (2009). The Early European “Federalism ”: Ambiguities of Talks About How to Walk Toward a Political Union . In: Imbeau, L. (eds) Do They Walk Like They Talk?. Studies in Public Choice, vol 15. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics