Skip to main content

Fundamentals of Multiobjective Optimization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Optimization and Economic Analysis

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 36))

Abstract

In all of the mathematical programming problems considered thus far, we have assumed that one particular objective function, such as the maximization of profit or minimization of cost, was prespecified by some decision maker. In general, however, there exist a large variety of objectives—including maximizing profit, revenue, and market share; increasing environmental quality; etc. Zeleny [89, p. 1] states that “multiple objectives are all around us.” There are some empirical studies supporting this hypothesis. Smith, Boyes, and Peseau [70] found that for 557 large U.S. firms, sales revenue and profits were objectives followed by the firms. Beedles [6] used time series data for the time period 1929–1973 for three large firms and showed that the firms pursued sales revenue, profits, and stock price as their objectives.

To manage a business is to balance a variety of needs and goals.

Milan Zelený (1982)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Reading

  1. H. Averch and L. L. Johnson, Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint, Amer. Econ. Rev., 52 (1962), 1052–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. E. Bailey and J. C. Malone, Resource allocation and the regulated firm, Bell J. Econ. Manage. Sci., 1 -1 (1970), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Ballestero and C. Romero, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Its Applications to Economic Problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Baumol, Business Behavior Value and Growth, Macmillan, NewYork, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Baumol, The theory of expansion of the firm, Amer. Econ. Rev., 52 (1962), 1078–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. L. Beedles, A micro-economic investigation of multi-objective firms, J. Finance, 32 (1977), 1217–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. A. Behringer, Lexicographic quasiconcave multiobjective programming, Z. Oper. Res., 21 (1977), 103–116.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. G. R. Bitran, Duality for nonlinear multiple-criteria optimization problems, J. Oper. Theory Appl., 38 (1981), 367–401.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Böhm and P. Brandner, Optimal economic policy making with an econometric model using interactive methods of vector optimization, in J. Gruber, ed., Econometric Decision Models: New Methods of Modeling and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 366, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991, 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Böhm and M. Luptáčik, Optimisation with an environmental input–output model, in G. Boero and A. Silberston, eds., Environmental Economics, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1995, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Brown and N. Revankar,A generalized theory of the firm: An integration of the sales and profit maximization hypothesis, Kyklos, 24 -3 (1971), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. A. Calvo, Staggered contracts in a utility-maximizing framework, J. Monetary Econ., 12 (1983), 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. C. Chow, Analysis and Control of Dynamic Systems,Wiley, NewYork, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. B. D. Craven, Strong vector minimization and duality, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 60 (1980), 1–5.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Despontin, P. Nijkamp, and J. Spronk, eds., Macro-Economic Planning with Conflicting Goals, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 230, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. J. van Eijk and J. Sandee, Quantitative determination of an optimum economic policy, Econometrica, 27 (1959), 1–33.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. F. M. Fisher, Book reviewofW. Baumol, Business BehaviorValue and Growth, J. Political Econ., 68 (1960), 314–315.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.A. Fox, J. K. Sengupta, and E. Thorbecke, The Theory of Quantitative Economic Policy with Applications to Economic Growth and Stabilization, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. A. Frankel and M. Funke,A two-country analysis of international targeting of nominal GNP, Rev. Political Econ., 83 (1993), 69–106.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. M. Friedman, Economic Stabilization Policy: Methods in Optimization, North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Frisch, Circulation planning: Proposal for a national organisation of a commodity and service exchange, Econometrica, 3 (1934), 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Frisch, A Memorandum on Price-Wage-Tax-Subsidy Policies as Instruments in Maintaining Optimal Envelopment, Document E (CN1/Dub 2), United Nations, New York, 1949; reprinted as Memorandum, Institute of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Frisch, Macroeconomics and linear programming, in Twenty-Five Economic Essays in Honour of Eric Lindahl, Ekonomisk Tidskrift, Stockholm, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Frisch, Numerical Determination of a Quadratic Preference Function for Use in Macroeconomic Programming Memorandum 14, Institute of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, 1957; reprinted in “Studies in Honour of Gustavo del Vecchio,” G. Econ. Ann. Econ., 1 (1961), 43–83.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Frisch and S. Staudinger, Inflation targeting versus nominal income targeting, J. Econ., 78 (2003), 113–137.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Fritz, Empirische Zielforschung und Operations Research: Eine Untersuchung unternehmerischer Ziele und ihre Konsequenzen für das Operations Research, Oper. Res. Spektrum, 8 (1986) 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Gal, Th. J. Stewart, and Th. Hanne, eds., Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. D. Gale, H.W. Kuhn, and A.W. Tucker, Linear programming and the theory of games, in T. C.Koopmans, ed., Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission Monograph 13,Wiley, NewYork, 1951, Chapter XIX, 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. M. Geoffrion, Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 22 (1968), 618–630.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Gruber, ed., Econometric Decision Models, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 208, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Gruber, ed., Econometric Decision Models: New Methods of Modeling and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 366, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Hall, On the goals on the firm: Comment, Q. J. Econ., 80 (1966) 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Hall and N. G. Mankiw, Nominal income targeting, in N. G. Mankiw, ed., Monetary Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. R. Hicks, Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of monopoly, Econometrica, 34 (1935), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. H. Isermann, Existence and duality in multiple objective linear programming, in H. Thiriez and S. Zionts, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 130, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976, 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Isermann, The relevance of duality in multiple objective linear programming, TIMS Stud. Manage. Sci., 6 (1977), 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. Isermann, Duality in multiple objective linear programming, in S. Zionts, ed., Multiple Criteria Problem Solving: Proceedings of a Conference, Buffalo, 1977, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 155, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, 274–285.

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. Isermann, On some relations between a dual pair of multiple objective linear programs, Z. Oper. Res., 22 (1978), 33–41.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. H. Isermann, Linear lexicographic optimization, Oper. Res. Spektrum, 4 (1982), 223–228.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. L. R. Klein, The use of econometric models as a guide to economic policy, Econometrica, 15 (1947), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. T. C. Koopmans, Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities, in T. C.Koopmans, ed., Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission Monograph 13, Wiley, NewYork, 1951, 33–97.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. S. H. Kornbluth, Duality indifference and sensitivity analysis in multiple objective linear programming, Oper. Res. Q., 25 (1974), 599–614.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, Nonlinear programming, in J. Neyman, ed., Proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1951, 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  44. O. Lange, The foundations of welfare economics, Econometrica, 10 (1942), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. L. Leiderman and L. E. O. Svensson, Inflation Targets, CEPR, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  46. W. W. Leontief, Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input–output approach, Rev. Econ. Statist., 52 (1970), 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. W. Leontief, Theoretical assumptions and nonobserved facts, Amer. Econ. Rev., 61 (1971), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Luptáčik and B. Böhm (1994), An environmental input–output model with multiple criteria, Ann. Oper. Res., 54, 119–127.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Luptáčik and F. Turnovec, Lexicographic geometric programming, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 51 (1991), 259–269.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. I. Marusciac, On Fritz John type optimality criterion in multiobjective optimization, Anal. Numér. Théorie Approx., 11 (1982), 109–114.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. B. T. McCallum, The Alleged Instability of Nominal Income Targeting, Paper G97/6, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Wellington, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  52. B. T. McCallum and E. Nelson, Nominal income targeting in an open economics optimizing model, J. Monetary Econ., 11 (1999), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. R. Marris, The Economic Theory of “Managerial” Capitalism, Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe, IL, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. P. Mastenbroek and P. Nijkamp, A spatial environmental model for an optimal allocation of investments, in P. Nijkamp, ed., Environmental Economics, Vol.2: Methods, Nijhoff Social Sciences, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  55. R. Neck, Ch. Richter, and P. Mooslechner, eds., Quantitative Economic Policy: Essays in Honour of Andrew Hughes Hallet, Springer, Berlin, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  56. T. Negishi,Welfare economics and existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy, Metroeconomica, 12 (1960), 92–97.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. P. Nijkamp, Environmental Policy Analysis,Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  58. D. K. Osborne, On the goals of the firm, Q. J. Econ., 77 (1964), 592–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. V. Pareto, Manuale di Economia Politica, Societa Editrice Libraria, Milan, 1906 (in Italian); Manual of Political Economy, Macmillan, New York, 1971 (in English; A. S. Schwier, transl.).

    Google Scholar 

  60. M. L. Petit, Control Theory and Dynamic Games in Economic Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  62. K. Ritter, Optimization theory in linear spaces III, Math. Ann., 184 (1970), 133–154.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. J. M. Roberts, NewKeynesian economics and the Phillips curve, J. Money Credit Banking, 27 (1995), 975–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. C. Romero, A note on distributive equity and social efficiency, J. Agric. Econ., 52 -2 (2001), 110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  65. R. Rosenberg, Profit constraint revenue maximization: A note, Amer. Econ. Rev., 61 (1971), 208–209.

    Google Scholar 

  66. E. E. Rosinger, Duality and alternative in multiobjective optimization, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 64 (1977), 307–312.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. W. A. Rödder, A generalized saddle-point theory, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1 (1977), 55–59.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. T. Scitovsky,A note on profit maximization and implications, Rev. Econ. Stud., 11 (1943), 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. C. Singh, Optimality conditions in multiobjective differentiable programming, J. Oper. Theory Appl., 53 (1987), 115–123.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. D. J. Smith, W. J. Boyes, and D. E. Peseau, Size, Growth, Profits, and Executive Compensation in the Large Corporation, Macmillan, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  71. W. Stadler,A survey of multicriteria optimization or the vector maximum problem, Part I: 1776–1960, J. Oper. Theory Appl., 29 (1979), 1–51.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  72. R. E. Steuer,An interactive multiple objective linear programming procedure, TIMS Stud. Manage. Sci., 6 (1977), 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  73. R. E. Steuer, L. R. Gardiner, and J. Gray, A bibliographic survey of the activities and international nature of multiple criteria decision making, J. Multicriteria Decision Anal., 5 (1996), 195–217.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. G. Stigler, The development of utility theory, J. Political Econ., 58 (1950), 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. L. E. O. Svensson, Inflation forecast targeting: Implementing and monitoring inflation targets, Eur. Econ. Rev., 41 (1997), 1111–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. L. E. O. Svensson, Optimal inflation targets, conservative central banks, and linear inflation contracts, Amer. Econ. Rev., 87 (1997), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  77. K. P. Schönfeld, Some duality theorems for the nonlinear vector maximum problem, Unternehmensforschung, 14 (1970), 51–63.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  78. T. Tanino and Y. Sawaragi, Duality theory in multiobjective programming, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 27 (1979), 509–529.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  79. H. Theil, Econometric models and welfare maximization, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 72 (1954), 60–83.

    Google Scholar 

  80. H. Theil, Optimal Decision Rules for Government and Industry, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1964.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. J.Tinbergen, On the Theory of Economic Policy, 1st printing, North-Holland,Amsterdam, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  82. J. Tinbergen, Economic Policy: Principles and Design, 1st ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  83. J.Tinbergen, Onthe Theory of EconomicPolicy, 4th printing, North-Holland,Amsterdam, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  84. F. Turnovec, Lexicografická maximalizace (Lexicographic maximization), Ekon. Mat. Obz., 3 (1983), 275–297.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  85. H. Wallenius, Optimizing macroeconomic policy: A review of approaches and applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 10 (1982), 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. H.Wallenius, I.Wallenius, and P. Vartia, An experimental investigation of an interactive programming approach to solving macroeconomic policy problems, in K. B. Haley, ed., Operational Research ’78, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, 878–894.

    Google Scholar 

  87. O.Williamson, The Economics of Discretionary Behaviour: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  88. M. E.Wolf and J. Hanauer, NAMEA der Luftschadstoffe Österreich 1980–1997, Statist. Nachr., 5 (2000), 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  89. M. Zeleny, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw–Hill, NewYork, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. S. Zionts and J.Wallenius, An interactive programming method for solving the multicriteria problem, Manage. Sci., 22 (1976), 652–663.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. J. Zowe, A duality theory for a convex programming in order-complete vector lattices, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 50 (1975), 273–287.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  92. J. Zowe, The saddle-point theorem of Kuhn and Tucker in ordered vector spaces, J. Math.Anal. Appl., 57 (1977), 41–55.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikuláš Luptáčik .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luptáčik, M. (2010). Fundamentals of Multiobjective Optimization. In: Mathematical Optimization and Economic Analysis. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 36. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89552-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics