Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Morality, Ethics, and Gifted Minds pp 49–71Cite as

Morality and High Ability: Navigating a Landscape of Altruism and Malevolence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This wide-ranging exploration of theory and research from ethical philosophy, political science, economics, psychology, primatology, and other disciplines extends beyond current perspectives on morality and giftedness in high-ability fields such as gifted education and creative studies. Morality largely derives from identity formation and maps along three dimensions on a new theoretic model of moral-ethical impact: from pure altruism through malevolence, from local to global impact, and from minimal to exceptional ability and influence. Providing a framework for synthesis of diverse conceptions of morality, the model incorporates various forms of moral behavior such as universalist and particularist morality, amorality, quasi-altruism, immorality, moral atomism, and reciprocal altruism. The nature and dynamics of these and other forms of morality are explored along with some important sociocontextual influences on individuals' identity formation and actions in the world. The influence of globalized, neoliberal ideology provides a specific example of the model's dynamics. Implications for the moral development of bright young people are discussed.

When individuals of high ability (broadly defined here as any combination of giftedness, talent, creativity, and intelligence) follow their aspirations and exercise their talents in the world their actions can have considerable moral impact. Understanding this impact requires an interdisciplinary search for insights because the nuances of high ability are too complex to be captured within the confines of one or a few disciplines (Ambrose 2005a, in press). The wide-ranging analysis in this chapter draws from multiple disciplines and generates a new conceptual model of moral-ethical impact.

Many of the research studies and theories in the analysis are little known in fields such as gifted education and creative studies, yet they have strong relevance to high ability. For example, much current theorizing about morality emerges from rational-choice theory in the social sciences and similar theory in evolutionary biology. These theories often imply that moral behavior derives from reciprocal altruism – doing something for others with the expectation of payback in the future. These explanations can elucidate cases of low-level altruism but they do not explain the more impressive acts of relational-altruistic, universalist morality, which come from perceptions of self as integrated with humanity as a whole as opposed to self as atomistic individual, or as part of an insular group (for elaboration, see Gewirth 1998; Monroe 1996, 2004). Considered together, discoveries from multiple disciplines provide more complete explanations of the more remarkable forms of altruism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambrose, D. (1998). Comprehensiveness of conceptual foundations for gifted education: A world-view analysis. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 452–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2000). World-view entrapment: Moral-ethical implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2002). Socioeconomic stratification and its influences on talent development: Some interdisciplinary perspectives. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2003). Barriers to aspiration development and self-fulfillment: Interdisciplinary insights for talent discovery. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2005a). Aspiration growth, talent development, and self-fulfillment in a context of democratic erosion. Roeper Review, 28, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2005b). Contexts for aspiration development and self-fulfillment: International comparisons. Gifted and Talented International, 20, 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2005c). Interdisciplinary expansion of conceptual foundations: Insights from beyond our field. Roeper Review, 27, 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2008). Utopian visions: Promise and pitfalls in the global awareness of the gifted. Roeper Review, 30, 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (in press). Expanding visions of creative intelligence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, R. P. (2005). Fighting sweatshops: Problems of enforcing global labor standards. In R. P. Appelbaum & W. I. Robinson (Eds.), Critical globalization studies (pp. 369–378). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Babb, S. (2001). Managing Mexico: Economists from nationalism to neoliberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2002). Beyond the market: The social foundations of economic efficiency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1994). Thought as a system. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, A. (2007). The cigarette century: The rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined America. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brustein, W. (1998). The logic of evil: The social origins of the Nazi party, 1925–1933. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J. (2007). Bad Samaritans: The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirot, D., & McCauley, C. (2006). Why not kill them all? The logic and prevention of mass political murder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millenium. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2007). Creativity and responsibility. In H. Gardner (Ed.), Responsibility at work: How leading professionals act (or don't act) responsibly (pp. 64–80). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development (Vols. 1 & 2). Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: Helping our children find their calling in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., & Colby, A. (1996). Education and moral commitment. Journal of Moral Education, 25, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, P. W., Wilson, T., Snyder, H., Norman, T., & Barger, B. (2005). Moral judgment: Developmental differences between gifted youth and college students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fern, Y. (1994). Gene Roddenberry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S., Hout, M., Jankowski, M. S., Lucas, S. R., Swidler, A., & Voss, K. (1996). Inequality by design: Cracking the bell curve myth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, T. (2006). The weather makers: The history and future impact of climate change. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischacker, S. (2004). On Adam Smith's wealth of nations: A philosophical companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folsom, C. (1998). From a distance: Joining the mind and moral character. Roeper Review, 20, 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (2007). Falling behind: How rising inequality harms the middle class. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991). The tensions between education and development. Journal of Moral Education, 20, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. NewYork: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (Ed.). (2007). Responsibility at work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, W. H., & Collins, C. (2004). Wealth and our commonwealth: Why America should tax accumulated fortunes. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. (1998). Self-fulfillment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. L., Rimmington, G. M., & Landwehr-Brown, M. (2008). Developing global awareness and responsible world citizenship with global learning. Roeper Review, 30, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goozner, M. (2005). The $800 million pill: The truth behind the cost of new drugs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz, M. J., & Shapiro, I. (2005). Death by a thousand cuts: The fight over taxing inherited wealth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, B. (1995). The place of achievement in the life of the spirit and the education of gifted students. Roeper Review, 18, 132–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1989). Creativity and human survival. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 278–287). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1993). Creativity in the moral domain: Ought implies can implies create. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (2003). Identity in democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2005). Off center: The Republican revolution and the erosion of American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague, W. J. (1998). Is there moral giftedness? Gifted Education International, 12, 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. E. (2005, December). Is there still time to avoid ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ with global climate? Paper presented at the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1985). Leviathan. New York: Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1651)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Retrieved Feb. 2nd, 2007, from http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

  • Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal con?icts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1987). Utopias and anti-utopias in modern times. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, R. (1999). Everything for sale: The virtues and limits of markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanker, B. (1999). I dream a world: Portraits of Black women who changed America. New York: Stewart, Tabori & Chang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launis, V., Pietarinen, J., & Raikka, J. (Eds.). (1999). Genes and morality. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 29–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovecky, D. V. (1997). Identity development in gifted children: Moral sensitivity. Roeper Review, 20, 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrick, J. (2008). The case for big government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J. (1999). The cancer stage of capitalism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J. (2002). Value wars: The global market versus the life economy. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. R. (2001). Self-deception unmasked. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, M. (2001). A model of extraordinary social engagement, or “moral giftedness.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, R. G. (2001). War stories: The search for a usable past in the Federal Republic of Germany. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. R. (1996). The heart of altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. R. (2004). The hand of compassion: Portraits of moral choice during the Holocaust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B., Jr. (2000). Moral purity and persecution in history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. Z. (1995). Adam Smith in his time and ours: Designing the decent society. Princeton, NJ: Princteon University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R. L. (2003). The wealth of nature: How mainstream economics has failed the environment. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W. F. (1984). World views and their influence on psychological thoughts and research: Khun-Lakatos-Laudan. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 91–226). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piechowski, M. M. (2003). From William James to Maslow and Dabrowski: Excitability of character and self actualization. In D. Ambrose, L. M. Cohen & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 283–322). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2005). I live in my own bubble: The values of talented adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 106–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presbey, G. M. (1997). Hannah Arendt on power. In L. D. Kaplan & L. F. Bove (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on power and domination (pp. 29–40). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, A. (2008). Global awareness and gifted children: Its joy and history. Roeper Review, 30, 8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant proximities: Dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (2003). Creativity in the moral domain: Integration and implications. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000). Merit and justice. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 5–16). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. (1993). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review, 17, 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T., Rainwater, L., & Burtless, G. (2002). United States poverty in a cross-national context. In S. H. Danziger & R. H. Haveman (Eds.), Understanding poverty (pp. 162–189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreacker, A. (2001). Educating for moral development. Gifted Education International, 15, 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B., & Adrian, H. (2005). The use of fiction as a didactic tool to examine existential problems. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2003). For the glory of God: How monotheism led to reformations, science, witch-hunts, and the end of slavery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36, 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of giftedness in leadership. Roeper Review, 28, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). Giftedness: The ultimate instrument for good and evil. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 447–465). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2007). Comparison of academically average and gifted students' self-rated ethical sensitivity. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, S. S. (1998). The lemming condition: Moral asynchrony and the isolated self. Roeper Review, 20, 211–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. S. (2008). Democracy incorporated: Managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, B. (2007). Global “body shopping”: An Indian labor system in the information technology industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2008). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Editor, Roeper Review, Graduate Department, School of Education, College of Liberal Arts, Education, and Sciences, Rider University, 2083 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648-3099, USA

    Don Ambrose

Authors
  1. Don Ambrose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don Ambrose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

    About this chapter

    Cite this chapter

    Ambrose, D. (2009). Morality and High Ability: Navigating a Landscape of Altruism and Malevolence. In: Cross, T., Ambrose, D. (eds) Morality, Ethics, and Gifted Minds. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6_4

    Download citation

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation