A Study of Interactive Narrative from User's Perspective

Chapter

Abstract

The topic of interactive narrative has been under debate for several years. What does it mean to be engulfed in an interactive narrative? Can users engage in a meaningful interactive narrative experience? Who tells the story, the designer or the player? While answers to these questions have not been formulated, the community is split. Some regard the question of interactive narrative as an oxymoron, philosophically regarding narrative and play as two separate entities [1, 2]. Others regard narrative as an integral aspect of any interactive or media production [3], [4].

References

  1. 1.
    E. Adams, “Three Problems for Interactive Storytellers,” Gamasutra, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Eskelinen, “The Gaming Situation,” Game Studies, The International Journal of Computer Game Research, vol. 1, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Jenkins, “Game Design as Narrative Architecture,” in The Game Design Reader, K. S. a. E. Zimmerman, Ed. Boston: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Zimmerman, “Narrative, Interactivity, Play, and Games,” in First Person, New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, N. a. H. Wardrip-Fruin, Pat, Ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. A. Loyall, “Believable Agents: Building Interactive Personalities,” in Computer Science Department, vol. PhD. Pittsburg: Carnegie Mellon University, 1997, pp. 222.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Weyhrauch, “Guiding Interactive Drama,” in School of Computer Science, vol. PhD. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Szilas, “A Computational Model of an Intelligent Narrator for Interactive Narrative,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 21, pp. 753–801, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Seif El-Nasr, “Interaction, Narrative, and Drama Creating an Adaptive Interactive Narrative using Performance Arts Theories,” 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Thue, V. Bulitko, and M. Spetch, “Making Stories Player-Specific: Delayed Authoring in Interactive Storytelling,” presented at The First Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (ICIDS), Erfurt, Germany, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Bates, B. Loyall, and S. Reilly, “An Architecture for Action, Emotion, and Social Behavior,” Computer Science, pp. 14, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Mateas and A. Stern, “Façade: An Experiment in Building a Fully-Realized Interactive Drama,” presented at Game Developers Conference, San Jose, CA, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Husserl, Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. F. Colaizzi, Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Reilly, “Believable Social and Emotional Agents,” in Computer Science, vol. PhD. Pittsburg: Carnagie Mellon University, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. Johnston and F. Thomas, The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation. New York: Disney Editions, 1981.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Mateas and A. Stearn, “Procedural Authorship: A Case-Study Of the Interactive Drama Façade,” presented at Digital Arts and Culture (DAC), Copenhagen, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Rousseau and B. Hayes-Roth, “A Social-Psychological Model for Synthetic Actors,” presented at Second international conference on Autonomous agents, Minneapolis, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Aylett, S. Louchart, J. Dias, A. Paiva, and E. Vala, FearNot! - An experiment in emergent narrative, 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Pizzi and M. Cavazza, “Affective Storytelling based on Characters’ Feelings,” University of Teesside, 2007.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Boal, Theater of the oppressed. New York: Urizen Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Seif El-Nasr, “An Interactive Narrative Architecture based on Filmmaking Theory,” 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Thue, V. Bulitko, M. Spetch, and E. Wasylishen, “Learning Player Preferences to Inform Delayed Authoring,” presented at AAAI Fall Symposium on Intelligent Narrative Technologies, Arlington, VA, 2007.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Mallon and B. Webb, “Stand up and take your place: identifying narrative elements in narrative adventure and role-play games,” Computers in Entertainment (CIE), vol. 3, pp. 6, 2005.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Paperback). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2006.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Mehta, S. Dow, M. Mateas, and B. MacIntyre, “Evaluating a Conversation-centered Interactive Drama,” presented at In Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS’07), 2007.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. M. Dow, M.; Lausier, A.; MacIntyre, B.; Mateas, M., “Initial Lessons from AR Façade, An Interactive Augmented Reality Drama.,” presented at ACM SIGCHI Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment (ACE’06), Los Angeles, 2006.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. M. A. Stern, “Architecture, Authorial Idioms and Early Observations of the Interactive Drama Façade,” 2002.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Fullerton, C. Swain, and S. Hoffman, Game Design Workshop, designing, prototyping, and playtesting games: CMP Books, 2004.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Murray, Hamlet on the Holodeck, The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Young, M. Riedl, M. Branly, A. Jhala, R. Martin, and C. Saretto, “An architecture for integrating plan-based behavior generation with interactive game environments,” Journal of Game Development, vol. 1, 2006.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    H. Barber and D. Kudenko, “Generation of dilemma-based interactive narratives with a changeable story goal,” presented at Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on INtelligent TEchnologies for interactive enterTAINment, Cancun, Mexico, 2008.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. Laurel, Computers as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1991.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. Cooper and R. Collins, Look What Happened to Frog: Storytelling in Education. Scottsdale, Arizona: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, 1992.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K. Johnson, “Lost Cause: An Interactive Movie Project,” in School of Interactive Arts and Technology, vol. Master of Arts. Surrey: Simon Fraser University, 2008.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Tanenbaum and K. Tanenbaum, “Improvisation and Performance as Models for Interacting with Stories,” presented at First Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (ICIDS), Erfurt, Germany, 2008.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    D. Milam, M. Seif El-Nasr, and R. Wakkary, “Looking at the Interactive Narrative Experience through the Eyes of the Participants,” presented at First Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, Erfurt, Germany, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Ineractive Arts and TechnologySimon Fraser UniversitySurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations