Skip to main content

Toward a Theory of Personalized Learning Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designs for Learning Environments of the Future

Abstract

This chapter proposes a theory for the design and dynamics of personalized learning communities (PLCs), with examples drawn from, but not limited to, common classroom environments. The theory is meant to draw on an eclectic set of frameworks and to supplement and inform other approaches to learning community design. It relies on 11 principles that each distinctively contribute to PLC design. The theory suggests that the principles interact with one another in synergistic and self-propagating ways that blur the differences between cause and effect in classroom dynamics. An example that blends five technologies in a single platform illustrates the higher-order interactions that can underlie the development of personalized learning communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson, B. (2003). Issues in scientific creativity: insight, perseverance and personal technique - Profiles of the 2002 Franklin Institute Laureates. Journal of The Franklin Institute, 340(3), 163-189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. & Barrett, D. J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2), 175-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & Donovan, S. (eds). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., et al. (2004). Model-based teaching & learning with BioLogica: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education & Technology, 13(1), 23-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2005, July 18-22, 2005). A framework for designing and analysing open learner modelling. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Norris, C. J., Decety, J., Monteleone, G., & Nusbaum, H. (2009). In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 83-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing engagement: Contributions of faculty to student engagement in engineering. Journal for Engineering Education, 97(3), 339-353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuansheng, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitaieva, J., Qi, D., & Gui, X. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to be creative across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 89-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. J. & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2007). Model based learning and instruction in science. Science and Education, 16(7-8), 647-652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. Y. N. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 161-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diefes-Dex. (2007). Collaborative research: Impact of model-eliciting activities on engineering teaching and learning: National Science Foundation Grant DUE-0717865 to Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D., Fox, J. L., & Watters, J. J. (2005). Problem posing and solving with mathematical modeling. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 156-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. J., Doll, B. B., Oas-Terpstra, J., & Moreno, F. (2009). Prefrontal and striatal dopaminergic genes predict individual differences in exploration and exploitation. Nature Neuroscience, 12(8), 1062-1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (2005). Affective composites: Autonomy and proxy in pedagogical agent networks. In J. Tao, J. Tan & R. E. Picard (Eds.), Affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII2005) (Vol. 3784, pp. 898-906). Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (2007a). Emerging metaphors and constructs from pedagogical agent networks. Educational Technology (Special Issue, A. Baylor editor), 47(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (2007b). What changes are occurring in the kind of problem-solving situations where mathematical thinking is needed beyond school? In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E., & Harding, N. (2008). IES grant: Agent and Library Augmented Shared Knowledge Areas (ALASKA). Institute for Education Sciences Award 305A080667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E., & Hurford, A. (2007). Combining Collaborative Workspaces with Tablet Computing: Research in Learner Engagement and Conditions of Flow. Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI, pages C3-C8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E., Lesh, R., & Lester, F. (2008). Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) as a bridge between engineering education research and mathematics education research. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(2), 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2000, April). Practice makes a difference: Design principles for adaptive expertise. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarson, M. A., Cardella, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Uncertainty and iteration in design tasks for engineering students. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang, C. (2006). Digitization of the experience sampling method: transformation, implementation, and assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 24(1), 106-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. A. (2000). Accretion representation for scrutable student modelling. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design(TM) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latz, A. O., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2009). Peer coaching to improve classroom differentiation: Perspectives from project CLUE. Roeper Review, 31(1), 27-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R. (2006). Modeling students modeling abilities: The teaching and learning of complex systems in education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 45-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (Cartographer). (2003). Beyond constructivism: A models & modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problems solving. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Hamilton, E., & Kaput, J. (2007). Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), The handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Middleton, J. A., Caylor, E., & Gupta, S. (2008). A science need: Designing tasks to engage students in modeling complex data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 113-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R. & Yoon, C. (2004). Evolving communities of mind-In which development involves several interacting and simultaneous developing strands. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 6(2), 205-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Yoon, C., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). John Dewey revisited—Making mathematics practical versus making practice mathematical. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlhorn, J. (2006). Fostering group creativity. Scientific American Mind, 17(4), 78-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., & Olds, M. (2007). Collaborative research: Impact of model-eliciting activities on engineering teaching and learning: National Science Foundation Grant DUE-0717862 to the Colorado School of Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89-105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2005). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2008). CreativeIT funding program - NSF 08572. Retrieved July 1, 2009 from http://nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08572/nsf08572.htm.

  • Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Shechtman, N., & Knudsen, J. (2008). The role of scaling up research in designing for and evaluating robustness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 149-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2007). Mathematical modeling ‘in the Wild’: A case of hot cognition. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2007). Collaborative research: Impact of model-eliciting activities on engineering teaching and learning: National Science Foundation Grant DUE-0717861 to the University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swee Fong, N. & Lee, K. (2009). The model method: Singapore children’s tool for representing and solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 282-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarquin, K. & Cook-Cottone, C. (2008). Relationships among aspects of student alienation and self concept. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 16-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. & Brown, J. S. (2009). Why virtual worlds can matter. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 37-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. (2008). Learning experience with virtual worlds. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(3), 263-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, M., James, C., & Gardner, H. (2009). Learning: Peering backward and looking forward in the digital era. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Hamilton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamilton, E., Jago, M. (2010). Toward a Theory of Personalized Learning Communities. In: Jacobson, M., Reimann, P. (eds) Designs for Learning Environments of the Future. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics