Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Breast Cancer Risk Reduction and Early Detection pp 81–115Cite as

Clinical Breast Examination and Breast Self-Examination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Historically, clinical breast examination (CBE) was a used as a diagnostic tool both to recognize and to diagnose breast cancer. CBE is no longer used to diagnose breast cancer, but rather is currently used as a screening test that can identify areas that might be breast cancer. Many of the observations that students are taught regarding CBE are more appropriate to advanced cancers that were common a century ago than to the smaller cancers seen in current practice. While CBE is less sensitive than mammography, it is nonetheless the primary mode of detecting the 15% of breast cancers that are missed by mammography.

Palpation of the supine patient is the essential step to detect almost all cancers that can be detected by CBE. Underlying ribs are the surface against which tissue is palpated. Observing where ribs can or cannot be felt through breast tissue is a useful way to compare different areas of the breasts of a woman and to compare the breasts one to another woman.

Breast self-examination (BSE) is an attempt to have women identify their own cancers at an early stage. Although there are many reasons to anticipate that BSE should work, randomized trials of BSE with increasingly sophisticated procedures for retraining and sustaining BSE practice have found that, although there is increased identification of benign breast abnormalities, there is no increased identification of cancer, and no improvement in breast cancer specific survival.

Silicone models are widely used to teach both CBE and BSE skills. Nonetheless, there are no data to support claims that these complicated and time-consuming methods of specific patterns and depths of palpation are the optimal way to teach or perform CBE or BSE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lewis D, Rienhoff WF. A study of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast. Ann Surg. 1932;95:336–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacCarty WC. Efficiency in diagnosis of neoplasms. SG&O. 1922;35:209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haggard WD, Douglass HL. Tumors of the breast. A study of two hundred and fifty-five cases. J Am Med Assoc. 1923;80:445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm, November 2009.

  5. Coleman EA, Feuer EJ, NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Breast cancer screening among women 65 to 74 years of age in 1987–88 and 1991. Ann Int Med. 1992;117:961–966.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chagpar AB, McMasters KM. Trends in mammography and clinical breast examination: a population-based study. J Surg Res. 2007;140:214–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell HS, Fletcher SW, Lin S, Pilgrim CA, Morgan TM. Improved physicians’ and nurses’ clinical breast examination: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Prevent Med. 1991;7:1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodson WH III, Moore DHII. Causes of physician delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1343–1348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwald P, Nasca PC, Lawrence CE, et al. Estimated effect of self-examination and routine physician examinations on breast-cancer mortality. New Eng J Med. 1978;299:271–273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huguley CM, Brown RL. The value of breast self-examination. Cancer. 1981;47:989–995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Senie RT, Lesser M, Kinne DW, Rosen PP. Method of tumor detection influences disease-free survival of women with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1994;73:1666–1672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Muscat JE, Huncharek MS. Breast self-examination and extent of disease: A population based study. Cancer Detect Prev. 1991;15:155–159.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reeves MJ, Newcomb PA, Remington PL, Marcus PM. Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988–1990. Cancer Causes Control. 1995;6:103–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holleb AL, Venet L, Day E, Hoyt S. Breast cancer detection by routine physical examination. New York State Med J. 1960;60:823–827.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbertsen VA, Kjelsberg M. Detection of breast cancer by periodic utilization of methods of physical diagnosis. Cancer. 1971;28:1552–1554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murimoto T, Komaki K, Mori T, et al. The quality of mass screening for breast cancer by physical examination. Surgery Today Jpn J Surg. 1993;23:200–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Bassett AA. Physical examination, its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer. 1822;1989(63):1816–.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Venet L, Strax P, Venet W, Shapiro S. Adequacies of breast examinations by physicians in mass screening. Cancer. 1971;28:1546–1551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hicks MJ, Davis JR, Layton Jm, Present AJ. Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 1979;242:2080–2083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodes ND, Lopez MJ, Pearson DK, Blackwell CW, Lankford HD. The impact of breast cancer screening on mortality. Cancer. 1986;57:581–585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bobo JK, Lee NC, Thames SF. Finding from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2000;92:971–976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast ultrasound and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Banjec C, Decker K, Chiarelli A, et al. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen. 2003;10:16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostereicher N, Lehman CD, Seger DJ, Buist DSM, White E. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive breast cancer detection in a mammography screening program. Am J Roent. 2005;184:428–432.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 1971;215:1777–1785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hansel DM, Cooke JC, Parsons CA. The accuracy of mammography alone and in combination with clinical examination and cytology in the detection of breast cancer. Clin Radiol. 1988;39:150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Fish EB, et al. Prospective evaluation of physical examination of the breast. Am J Surg. 1981;142:331–334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Marsh SK, Archer TJ. Accuracy of general practitioner referrals to a breast clinic. Ann Roy Coll Surgeons Engl. 1996;78:203–205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Goodson WHIII, Grissom NA, Moore DHII, Dribas FM. Streamlining clinical breast examination. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1476–1477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pennypacker HS, Pilgrim CA. Achieving competence in clinical breast examination. Nurse Pract Forum. 1993;4:85–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mahoney L, Csima A. Efficiency of palpation in clinical detection of breast cancer. Canadian Med Assoc J. 1982;127:729–730.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Haagensen CA. Carcinoma of the breast. J Am Med Assoc. 1948;138:195–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Robles-De-La-Torre, Hayward V. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature. 2001;412:445–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spence C. Multisensory attention and tactile information-processing. Behavioral Brain Res. 2002;135:57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Petrakis NL, Mason L, Lee R, et al. Association of race, age, menopausal status, and cerumen type with breast fluid secretion in nonlactating women, as determined by nipple aspiration. J Natl Cancer Inst. Apr 1975;54(4):829–834.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheattle GL. The importance of early symptoms in diseases of the breast. Br Med J. 1927;2:47–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Goodson WHIII, Miller TR, Sickles EA, Upton RA. Lack of correlation of clinical breast examination with high-risk histopathology. Am J Med. 1990 Dec;89(6):752–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Goodson WHIII, Moore DHII. Overall clinical breast examination as a factor in delayed diagnosis of breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2002 Oct;137(10):1152–1156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Groenendijk RPR, Bult P, Tewarie L, et al. Screen-detected breast cancers have a lower mitotic activity index. Brit J Cancer. 2000;82:381–384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Porter GJR, Evans AJ, Burrell HC, et al. Interval breast cancers: prognostic features and survival by subtype and time since screening. J Med Screen. 2006;13:115–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Evans AJ, Kutt E, Record C, et al. Radiological and pathological findings of interval cancers in a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40–41 years. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:348–352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Brekelmans CT, van Gorp JM, Peeters PH, Collette HJ. Histopathology and growth rate of interval breast carcinoma. Characterization of different subgroups. Cancer. 1996;78:1220–1228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zackrisson S, Janzon L, Manjer J, Andersson I. Improved survival rate for women with interval breast cancer – results from the breast cancer screening programme in Malmo, Sweden 1976 – 1999. J Med Screen. 2007;14:138–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pagana TJ, Lubbe WJ, Schwartz SM, Sprechini GD. A comparison of palpable and nonpalpable breast cancers. Arch Surg. 1989;124:26–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bassett LW, Liu TH, Giuliano AE, Gold RH. The prevalence of carcinoma in palpable vs impalpable mammographically detected lesions. Am J Radiol. 1991;157:21–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Reintigen D, Berman C, Cox C, et al. The anatomy of missed breast cancers. Surgical Oncol. 1993;2:65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Perdue PW, Galbo C, Ghosh C. Stratification of palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer by method of detection and age. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:512–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lung JA, Hart NE, Woodbury R. An overview and critical analysis of breast cancer screening. Arch Surg. 1988;123:833–838.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lopez MJ, Balckwell CW. Breast cancer detection by screening: the importance of long-term follow-up. Surgery. 1989;106:590–595.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sener SF, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP, et al. Survival rates for breast cancers detected in a community service screening mammogram practice. Am J Surg. 2006;191:406–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Loughry CW, Price TE, Morek WM, et al. Right and left breast volume distribution comparisons in normal and tumor containing breasts. Cancer Detect Prev. 1987;10:215–221.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Losken A, Fishman I, Denson DD, Moyer HR, Carlson GW. An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:571–575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kopans DB, Swann CA, White G, et al. Asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology. 1989;171:639–643.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Scutt D, Lancaster GA, Manning JT. Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(2):R14:Epub 2006 Mar 20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sanfilippo JS, Berman B, Spratt JS, et al. Establishment of a clinical teaching associates breast examination program for medical students. J Reproductive Med. 1986;31:245–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Haagensen CD. Self-examination of the breasts. J Am Med Assoc. 1952;149:356–360.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Foster RS, Lang SP, Costanza MC, et al. Breast self-examination practices and breast cancer. NEJM. 1978;299:265–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Huguley CM, Brown RL, Greenberg RS, Clark WS. Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer. Cancer. 1988;62:1389–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Feldman JG, Carter AC, Nicastri AD, Hosat ST. Breast self-examination, relationship to stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Cancer. 1981;47:2740–2745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Foster RS, Costanza MC. Breast self-examination practices and breast cancer survival. Cancer. 1984;53:999–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Auvinen A, Elovainio L, Hakama M. Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;38:161–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Tsechkovski M. Self-examination in the early detection of breast cancer. A review of evidence, with recommendations for further research. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38:527–540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer group. 16-year mortality from breast cancer in the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer. Lancet. 1999;353:1909–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Semiglazov VF, Moiseyenko VM, Manikhas AG, et al. Role of breast self-examination in early detection of breast cancer: Russia/Who prospective trial St. Petersburg. . Cancer Strategy. 1999;6:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: Final results. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1445–1457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Devi BCR, Tang TS, Corbex M. Reducing by half the percentage of late-presentation for breast and cervix cancer over 4 years: a pilot study of clinical downstaging in Sarawak, Malaysia. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1172–1176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Adams CK, Hall DC, Pennypacker HS, et al. Lump detection in simulated human breasts. Percept Psychophys. 1976;20:163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hall DC, Adams CK, Stein GH, et al. Improved detection of human breast lesions following experimental training. Cancer. 1980;46:408–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Saunders KJ, Pilgrim CA, Pennypacker HS. Increased proficiency of search in breast self-examination. Cancer. 1986;58:2351–2537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. McDermott MM, Dolan NC, Huang J, Reifler D, Rademaker AW. Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulation postmenopausal breast tissue. J Gen Internal Med. 1996;11:112–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Fletcher SW, O‘Malley MS, Pilgrim CA, Gonzalez JJ. How do women compare with internal medicine residents in breast lump detection? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:277–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Smith RL, Hanchak NA, Bloom H, et al. The effectiveness of postgraduate education on the clinical breast examination skills of primary care physicians. Am J Manag Care. 1996;2:989–995.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Trapp MA, Kottke TE, Vierkant JS, Kaur JS, Sellers TA. The ability of trained nurses to detect lumps in a set of silicone breast models. Cancer. 1999;86:1750–1756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Vetto JT, Petty JK, Dunn N, Prouser NC, Austin DF. Structured clinical breast examination (CBE) training results in objective improvement in CBE skills. J Cancer Educ. 2002;17:124–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Steiner E, Austin DF, Prouser NC. Detection and description of small breast masses by residents using a standardized clinical breast exam curriculum. J Gen Internal Med. 2008;23:129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Goodson WH III, Hunt TK Jr, Plotnik J, Moore DH II. Optimization of clinical breast examination. Am J Med (in press – April 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. NEJM. 1998;338:1089–1096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA

    William H. Goodson III

Authors
  1. William H. Goodson III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William H. Goodson III .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, N. Columbia Road 501, Grand Forks, 58203, U.S.A.

    Edward R. Sauter

  2. Dept. Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cottman Ave. 333, Philadelphia, 19111-2497, U.S.A.

    Mary B. Daly

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodson, W.H. (2010). Clinical Breast Examination and Breast Self-Examination. In: Sauter, E., Daly, M. (eds) Breast Cancer Risk Reduction and Early Detection. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87583-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87583-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87582-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87583-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation