Advertisement

The Role of Descriptive Inquiry in Building Presence and Civic Capacity

  • Carol Rodgers
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationships between inquiry, presence, and civic capacity in teaching. More specifically, it looks at the critical skill of descriptive inquiry, its place in the larger scheme of reflection, and its role in the cultivation of presence and civic capacity. Drawing largely on John Dewey and Patricia Carini, I explore two modes of inquiry in which presence might be cultivated and civic capacity developed: the descriptive review of children and children’s work (Himley and Carini 2000; Carini 2001; Rodgers 2006b), and descriptive feedback (Rodgers 2006b). I claim that the discipline of descriptive inquiry is a means of acknowledging and drawing upon the vast capacity of all teachers and learners, as human beings, to shape their individual and collective experience.

Keywords

Presence Inquiry Description Civic capacity Reflection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to acknowledge the students who so graciously agreed to share their work. I also want to acknowledge the immensely helpful feedback from my colleagues, Claire Stanley and Kathleen Graves, on an earlier draft of this chapter. My grateful thanks also to Miriam Raider-Roth and James Garrison for their very thoughtful and provocative reviews of this chapter.

References

  1. Blythe, F. Allan D, Powell, B. S. (2006) Looking Together at Student work: A companion guide to assessing on student learning (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carini, P. F. (2001). Starting strong. A different look at children, school, and standards. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carini, P. (2001) Puts of our lever, in P. Carini, STARTING STRONG, Teachers college press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. (1916/1980). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston, P. R. Baysinger, & B. Levine (Eds.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899-1924 (vol. 9). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigree Books.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  8. Fine, M., & Weis, L. (2003). Silenced voices and extraordinary conversations. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hansen, D. T. (ed). (2006). John Dewey and our educational prospect: A critical engagement with Dewey’s democracy and education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Himley, M., & Carini, P. F. (2000). From another angle: Children’s strengths and school standards. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Meares, M. (2003). Voice, agency, and engagement: Narratives of negative work experiences from employees from traditionally muted groups. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, CA, 27 May 2003. Online PDF 2008-09-29.Google Scholar
  12. Miron, L. F., & Lauria, M. (1998). Student voice as agency: Resistance and accommodation in inner-city schools. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(2), 189-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Rodgers, C. (2002a). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 74(4), 842-866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodgers, C. (2002b). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230-253.Google Scholar
  16. Rodgers, C. (2006a). Attending to student voice: The impact of descriptive feedback on learning and teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 209-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodgers, C. (2006b). Experience as art: The process of valuing and appreciating the work of children in teacher education. Teacher Education and Practice, 19(4), 434-454.Google Scholar
  18. Rodgers, C., & Raider-Roth, M. (2006). Presence in teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 265-287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Seidel, S, (1998). Learning from looking in N. Lyons (editor), 1998, With Portfolio in Hand, Validating the new teacher professionalism, Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Simon, K. G. (2001). Moral questions in the classroom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Theory and PracticeUniversity of Albany, State University of New YorkAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations