Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural, Physiological, Functional, and Cultural Differences in Skin of Color

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Skin of Color

  • 2385 Accesses

Abstract

Skin of color is defined as non-Caucasian skin types, which by Fitzpatricks’ classification comprise skin types III-VI. There is great variability in skin pigmentation among distinct racial and ethnic groups, making it difficult to define skin types simply by ethnicity, race, or culture. Individuals with darker skin comprise a wide range of racial and ethnic groups including Africans, African-Americans, African-Caribbean, Japanese, Chinese, Asians, Latinos, Indians, and Pakistanis, to name just a few. Presently, individuals with pigmented skin comprise 80% of the world population. As expected, demand for health care services by individuals with skin of color will grow substantially as this population grows. This demand will also expand as newer technologies and treatment for skin diseases develop. Therefore, the importance of studying the differences that exist in the structure, physiology, function, and culture of ethnic skin cannot be overemphasized. Most of the early literature on pigmented skin has produced conflicting results that are difficult to interpret or generalize. This is as a result of small sample sizes, non-standardized approaches and methodologies, varying anatomic sites, and the use of subjective parameters. This chapter will summarize the current data regarding ethnic skin differences. An understanding of structural, physiological, and functional differences in pigmented skin will lead to a better grasp of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of skin diseases particularly those that disproportionately affect the ethnic population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Talakoub L, Wesley NO. Differences in perceptions of beauty and cosmetic procedures performed in ethnic patients. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2009;28(2):115–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. US Census Bureau. Population projections of the US by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin: 1995–2050. Current population report: 25–1130. Washington, DC: US Government Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Halder RM, Nootheti PK. Ethnic skin disorders overview. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(6):S143–8. Supplement 1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlson BM. Integumentary, skeletal, and muscular systems. In: Carlson BM, editor. Human embryology and developmental biology. 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. p. 153–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson D, Berdardesca E, Maiback HI. In vitro transepidermal water loss: differences between Black and White skin. Br J Dermatol. 1988;119:647–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont C. In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in Blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two non-invasive methods. Skin Pharmacol. 1993;6:200–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont C. In vivo evaluation in man by two noninvasive methods of the stratum corneum barrier function after physical and chemical modifications. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 1991;13(6):293–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulfate induced cutaneous irritation: Black and White. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:65–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced cutaneous irritation comparison of White and Hispanic subjects. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;19:136–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berardesca E. Racial differences in skin function. Acta Derm Venereol. 1994;185(suppl):44–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warrier AG, Kligman AM, Harper RA, Bowman J, Wickett RR. A comparison of Black and White skin using noninvasive methods. J Soc Cosmetic Chem. 1996;47:229–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sonia Badreshia-Bansal, Taylor SC. The structure and function of skin of color. In: Kelly PA, Kelly AP, Taylor SC, editors. Dermatology for skin of color. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009. p. 71–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fotoh C, Elkhyat A, et al. Cutaneous differences between Black, African or Caribbean mixed-race and Caucasian women: biometrological approach of the hydrolipidic film. Skin Res Technol. 2008;14(3):327–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wesley NO, Maibach HI. Racial (ethnic) differences in skin properties: the objective data. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(12):843–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Man MQ, Sin XJ, et al. Variation of skin surface pH, sebum content and stratum corneum hydration with age and gender in a large Chinese population. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2009;22(4):190–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Diridollou S, Rigal J, et al. Comparative study of the hydration of the stratum corneum between four ethnic groups: influence of age. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46 Suppl 1:11–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hachem J, Crumrine D, et al. pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity/cohesion. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:345–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hellemans L, et al. Characterization of stratum corneum properties in human subjects from a different genetic background. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124:371.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berardesca E, Pirot F, Singh M, et al. Differences in stratum corneum pH gradient when comparing White Caucasian and Black African-American skin. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:855–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weigand DA, Haygood C, Gaylor JR. Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasian stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol. 1974;62:563–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Corcuff P, Lotte C, Rougier A, et al. Racial differences in corneocytes: a comparison between Black, White, and oriental skin. Acta Derm Venereal. 1978;70:355–7. (Stockh) 1991; 71: 146–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reinerston RP, Wheatley VR. Studies on the chemical composition of human epidermal ­lipids. J Invest Dermatol. 1959;32:49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harding CR, Moore AE, et al. Dandruff: a condition characterized by decreased levels of intercellular lipids in scalp stratum corneum and impaired barrier function. Arch Dermatol Res. 2002;294:221–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Olson RL, Gaylor J, Everett MA. Skin color, melanin, and erythema. Arch Dermatol. 1973;108:541–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitchell R. The skin of the Australian aborigines: a light and electron microscopical study. Aust J Dermatol. 1968;9:314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaidbey KH, Agin PP, Sayre RM, Kligman A. Photoprotection by melanin – a comparison of Black and Caucasian skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1979;1:249–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Szabo G. Pigment cell biology. In: Gordon M, editor. Mitochondria and other cytoplasmic inclusions. New York: Academic; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Starkco RS, Pinkush H. Quantitative and qualitative data on the pigment cell of adult human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1957;28:33.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lehman AL, Silvers WK, et al. The underwhite (uw) locus acts autonomously and reduces the production of melanin. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115(4):601–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smit NPM, Kolb RM, Lentjes EGWM, Noz KC, van der Meulen H, Koerten HK, et al. Variations in lelanin formation by cultured melanocytes from different skin types. Arch Dermatol Res. 1998;290:342–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Alaluf S, Heath A, Carter N, et al. Variation in melanin content and composition in type V and VI photoexposed and photoprotected human skin: the dominant role of DHI. Pigment Cell Res. 2001;14:337–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alaluf S, Atkins D, Barrett K, Blount M, Carter N, Heath A. Ethnic variation in melanin content and composition in photoexposed and photoprotected human skin. Pigment Cell Res. 2002;15:112–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Thong Y, Jee SH, et al. The patterns of melanosome distribution in keratinocytes of human skin as one determining factor of skin colour. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(3):498–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Toda K, Patnak MA, Parrish A, Fitzpatrick TB. Alteration of racial differences in melanosome distribution in human epidermis after exposure to ultraviolet light. Nat New Biol. 1972;236:143–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Montagna W, Carlisle K. The architecture of Black and White facial skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:929–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Herzberg AJ, Dinehart SM. Chronologic aging in Black skin. Am J Dermatopathol. 1989;11:319–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ancans J, Tobin DJ, Hoogduijn MJ, Smit NP, Wakamatsu K, Thody AJ. Melanosomal pH controls rate of melanogenesis, eumelanin/phaeomelanin ratio and melanosome maturation in melanocytes and melanoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 2001;268:26–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yohn JJ, Lyons BM, et al. Cultured human melanocytes from Black and White donors have different sunlight and ultraviolet A radiation sensitivities. J Invest Dermatol. 1992;99(4):454–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gunathilake R, Schurer N, et al. pH-regulated mechanisms account for pigment-type differences in epidermal barrier function. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1719–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tadokoro T, Kobayashi N, Zmudzka BZ, et al. UV induced DNA damage and melanin content in human skin differing in racial/ethnic origin. J Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2003;17:1177–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. De Winter S, Vink AA, Roza L, Pavel S. Solar-simulated skin adaptation and its effect on subsequent UV-induced epidermal DNA damage. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:678–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Querleux B, Baldeweck T, et al. Skin from various ethnic origins and aging: an in vivo cross-sectional multimodality imaging study. Skin Res Technol. 2009;15:306–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Girardeau S, et al. The Caucasian and African skin types differ morphologically and functionally in their dermal component. Exp Dermatol. 2009;18:704–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sugiyama-Nakagiri Y, et al. Ethnic differences in the structural properties of facial skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2009;53:135–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Johnson Jr BL. Differences in skin type. In: Johnson Jr BL, Moy RL, White GM, editors. Ethnic skin: medical and surgical. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sueki H, Whitaker-Menezes D, Kligman AM. Structural diversity of mast cell granules in Black and White skin. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:85–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ketchum LD, et al. Hypertrophic and keloidal scars. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;53:140–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Oluwasanmi JO. Keloidal scars in the African. Clin Plast Surg. 1974;1:179–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kischer CW, Bunce H, Sheltar MR. Mast cell analysis in hypertrophic scars, hypertrophic scars treated with pressure and mature scars. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;70:355–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Malkinson FD, Gehlman L. Factors affecting percutaneous absorption. In: Drill VA, Lazar P, editors. Cutaneous toxicology. New York: Academic; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Scheuplein RJ, Blank IH. Permeability of the skin. Physiol Rev. 1971;51:702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Marzulli FN. Barriers to skin penetration. J Invest Dermatol. 1962;39:387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Effect of race gender, and skin type of epidermal permeability barrier function. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102:537.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stoughton RB. Bioassay methods for measuring percutaneous absorption. In: Montagna W, Stoughton RB, van Scott EJ, editors. Pharmacology of the skin. New York: Appleton; 1969. p. 542–4.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in pharmacodynamic responses to nicotinates in vivo in human skin: Black and White. Arch Derm Venereol. 1990;70:63–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Wickrema-Sinha WJ, Shaw SR, Weber OJ. Percutaneous absorption and excretion of tritium-labelled diflorasone diacetate: a new topical corticosteroid in the rat, monkey and man. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;7:372–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Guy RH, Tur E, Bjerke S, Maibach H. Are there age and racial differences to methyl nicotinate-induced vasodilatation in human skin? J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:1001–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Taylor S. Understanding skin of colour. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(Suppl):S41–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Frosch RJ, Kligman AM. The chamber scarification test for assessing irritancy of topically applied substances. In: Drill VA, Lazar P, editors. Cutaneous toxicology. New York: Academic; 1977. p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Cutaneous reactive hyperemia: racial differences induced by corticoid application. Br J Dermatol. 1989;129:787–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Goh CL, Chia SE. Skin irritability to sodium-lauryl sulphate-as measured by skin water vapour loss – by sex and race. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1988;13:16–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Robinson MK. Population differences in acute skin irritation response: race, sex, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46:86–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Foy V, Weinkauff R, Whittle E, Basketter DA. Ethnic variation in the skin irritation response. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45:346–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Aramaki J, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Loffler H. Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:1052–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Szabo G, Gerald AB, Patnak MA, Fitzpatrick TB. Racial differences in the fate of melanosomes in humane epidermis. Nature. 1969;222:1081–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Halder RM, Bridgeman-Shah S. Skin cancer in African Americans. Cancer. 1995;75:667–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. English DR, Armstrong BK, Kricker A, Fleming C. Sunlight and cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8:271–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Abe T, Arai S, Mimura K, Hayakawa R. Studies of physiological factors affecting skin susceptibility to ultraviolet light irradiation and irritants. J Dermatol. 1983;10:531–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Yamaguchi Y, Takahashi K, et al. Human skin responses to UV radiation: pigment in the upper epidermis protects against DNA damage in the lower epidermis and facilitates apoptosis. FASEB J. 2006;20:1486–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Tadokoro T, Yamaguchi Y, Batzer J, Coelho SG, Zmudzka BZ, Miller SA, et al. Mechanisms of skin tanning in different racial/ethnic groups in response to ultraviolet radiation. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124:1326–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Rijken F, Brunijnzeel PLB, van Weedlden H, Kiekens RCM. Responses of Black and White skin to solar simulating radiation: differences in DNA photodamage, infiltrating neutrophils, proteolytic enzymes induced, keratinocyte activation and IL-10 expression. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:1448–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Yamaguchi Y, Beer J, et al. Melanin mediated apoptosis of epidermal cells damaged by ultraviolet radiation: factors influencing the incidence of skin cancer. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;30:S43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. The evolution of human skin coloration. J Hum Evol. 2000;39(1):57–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Loomis WF. Skin-pigment regulation of vitamin-D biosynthesis in man. Science. 1967;157(788):501–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Aoki K. Sexual selection as a cause of human skin color variation: Darwin’s hypothesis revisited. Ann Hum Biol. 2002;29(6):589–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lips P. Vitamin D physiology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006;92(1):4–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Webb AR, Holick MF. The role of sunlight in the cutaneous production of vitamin D3. Annu Rev Nutr. 1988;8:375–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Webb AR, DeCosta BR, Holick MF. Sunlight regulates the cutaneous production of vitamin D3 by causing its photodegradation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;68(5):882–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Yuen AW, Vitamin NG. Vitamin D: in the evolution of human skin colour. Med Hypotheses. 2010;74(1):39–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Looker AC, Dawson-Hughes B. Seasonal changes in plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of adolescents and adults in two seasonal subpopulations from NHANES III. Bone. 2002;30:771–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Brazerol WF, McPhee AJ, et al. Serial UVB exposure and serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D response in young adult Americans Black and Whites. J Am Coll Nutr. 1988;7:111–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Harris SS, Dawson-Hughes B. Seasonal changes in plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of young American Black and White women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:1232–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Cornish DA, Maluleke V, Mhlanga T. An investigation into a possible relationship between vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, calcium and magnesium in a normally pigmented and an albino rural Black population in the Northern Province of South Africa. Biofactors. 2000;11:35–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Harris SS. Vitamin D and African Americans. Am Soc Nutr. 2006;136:1126–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Johnson LG, Landon MM. Eccrine sweat gland activity and racial differences in resting skin conductance. Psychophysiology. 1965;1:322–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Montagna W, Parakkal PF. The structure and function of skin. 3rd ed. New York: Academic; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  87. McCance RA, Purohit G. Ethnic differences in response to the sweat glands to pilocarpine. Nature. 1969;221:378–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. McCance RA, Rutishauser IHE, Knight HC. Response to sweat glands to pilocarpine in the Bantu of Uganda. Lancet. 1968;1:663–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Calhoun DA, Oparil S. Racial differences in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Am J Med Sci. 1995;310:S86–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Homma H. On apocrine sweat glands in White and Negro men and women. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1956;38:365.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Schiefferdecker P. Die Hautdruisen des Menschen und der Saugetiere, ihre biologische und rassenanatomische Bedeutung, sowie die Muscularis sexualis. Zoologica. 1922;27:1–154.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Homma H. On apocrine sweat glands in White and Negro men and women. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1926;38:365.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Hurley HJ, Shelley WB. The physiology and pharmacology of the apocrine sweat gland. In: Hurley HJ, Shelley WB, editors. The human apocrine sweat gland in health and disease. Springfield: Charles Thompson; 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Goldsmith LA. Biology of eccrine and apocrine sweat glands. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, et al., editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine, vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kligman AM, Shelley WB. An investigation of the biology of the sebaceous gland. J Invest Dermatol. 1958;30:99–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Pochi P, Strauss JS. Sebaceous gland activity in Black skin. Dermatol Clin. 1988;6:349.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Abedeen SK, Gonzalez M, Judodihardjo H, Gaskell S, Dykes P. Racial variation in sebum excretion rate. Program and abstracts of the 58th annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 10–15. San Francisco; 2000. Abstract #559.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Yamamoto A, Serizawa S, Ito M. Effect of aging on sebaceous gland activity and on the fatty acid composition of wax eaters. Invest Dermatol. 1987;89:507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. del Guidice P, Yves P. The widespread use of skin lightening creams in Senegal: a persistent public health problem in West Africa. Int J Dermatol. 2002;41(2):68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Petit A, Cohen-Ludmann C, Clevenbergh P, Bergmann JF, Dubertret L. Skin lightening and its complications among African people living in Paris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:873–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Holloway V. Ethnic cosmetic products. Dermatol Clin. 2003;21:743–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Mahe A, et al. The cosmetic use of skin-lightening products pregnancy in Dakar, Senegal: a common and potentially hazardous practice. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:183–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Sir Hazsnim M. Poisoning from henna dye and paraphenylenediamine mixture in children in Khartoum. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1992;12:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Zinkham WH, Oski FA. Henna: a potential cause of oxidative hemolysis and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics. 1996;97:707–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Look KM, Look RM. Skin scraping, cupping, and moxibustion that may mimic physical abuse. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42:103–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Davis RE. Cultural health care or child abuse? The Southeast Asian practice of Caogio. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2000;12(3):89–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Riverside Family Medicine Residency, Newport News, VA, USA

    Adedamola Adegbenro M.D.

  2. Society Hill Dermatology and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Susan Taylor M.D.

Authors
  1. Adedamola Adegbenro M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Taylor M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Taylor M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, Skin of Color Center, New York, 10025, New York, USA

    Andrew F. Alexis

  2. Rush University, Department of Dermatology, Chicago, 60602, Illinois, USA

    Victoria H. Barbosa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adegbenro, A., Taylor, S. (2013). Structural, Physiological, Functional, and Cultural Differences in Skin of Color. In: Alexis, A., Barbosa, V. (eds) Skin of Color. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84929-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84929-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-84928-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-84929-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation