Skip to main content

Meaningful Consideration of Competence to be Executed

  • Chapter
Mental Disorder and Criminal Law

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkins v. Virginia, 536 US 304 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard v. Collins, 13 F.3d 871 (5th Cir. 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billiott v. State, 655 So.2d 1 (Miss. 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. (2005). Mentally ill prisoners on death row: Unsolved puzzles for courts and legislatures. Catholic University Law Review, 54, 1169–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, S. L., Zapf, P. A.,&Boccaccini, M. T. (1999, October). Post conviction relief: The assessment of competence for execution. Paper presented at Psychological Expertise and Criminal Justice: A conference for psychologists and lawyers jointly sponsored by the American Psychological Association and the Criminal Justice Section of the American Bar Association. Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe v. Bell, 209 F.3d 815 (6th Cir. 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. D., & Vigen, M. P. (2002). Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: A critical review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 191–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fearance v. Scott, 56 F.3d 633 (5th Cir. 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford v. Wainright, 477 US 399 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett v. Collins, 951 F.2d 57 (5th Cir. 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K., & McClaren, H. (1988). The assessment of competency for execution: An overview. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenfield v. Butler, 843 F.2d 183 (5th Cir. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, M. (2007). Executing the mentally ill: When is someone sane enough to die? Criminal Justice, 22(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N., Slobogin, C., Lyons, P., & Otto, R. K. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professional and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. S., & Radelet, M. S. (1993). Executing the mentally ill: The criminal justice system and the case of Alvin Ford. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K. (2008). Challenges and advances in assessment of response style. In R. Rogers. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., Slobogin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2006). Utilizing and accessing third party information: Legal and ethical issues. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles (pp. 190–205). New York: John Wiley&Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. A., & Otto, R. K. (1987). Evaluations of competency to be executed: Legal contours and implications for assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 US; 127 S.Ct. 2842 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetti v. Dretke, 448 F.3d 815 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector v. Clark, 923 F.2d 570 (8th Cir. 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of malingering and deception. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology (pp. 109–132). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobogin, C. (2007). The Supreme Court’s recent criminal mental health cases: Rulings of questionable competence. Criminal Justice, 22(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tran v. State, 6 S.W.3d 257 (Supreme Court of Tennessee, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter v. Angelone, 321 F.3d 422 (4th Cir. 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton v. Johnson, 306 F.Supp. 2d. 597 (W.D. Virginia, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton v. Johnson, 407 F.3d 285 (Fourth Cir. 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 160 (Fourth Cir. 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore v. Lockhart, 8. F.3d 614 (8th Cir. 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, P. A., Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Assessment of competency for execution: Professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Otto, R.K. (2009). Meaningful Consideration of Competence to be Executed. In: Schopp, R.F., Wiener, R.L., Bornstein, B.H., Willborn, S.L. (eds) Mental Disorder and Criminal Law. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84845-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics