Skip to main content

This chapter summarizes and analyzes the results of the various country studies. Rather than merely combining the data for all 17 countries included in the country studies, it was thought that subdividing them into various groups on the basis of recent history might be more meaningful. However, there is a certain amount of arbitrariness involved in doing so.

The most obvious subdivision would be to list and analyze the former Soviet republics separately, since they have a common recent history. Countries in this group include Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova and Ukraine.

However, once one gets beyond the former Soviet republics, the decision of how to classify the remaining countries requires some subjective judgment. One possibility would be to split the remaining countries into a Balkan group and a Central and East European group. Such a categorization makes some sense, since the Central and East European group were in the Soviet bloc until 1989, whereas the Balkan countries followed a different path. Or at least that is the case superficially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • OECD. (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2001). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Croatia, September. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Georgia, March. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www. worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Czech Republic, July. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Lithuania, July. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bulgaria, September. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Latvia, December. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Hungary, February. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2003). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Slovak Republic, October. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Romania, April. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www. worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Slovenia, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www. worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2004). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Moldova, May. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www. worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Armenia, April. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www. worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Macedonia, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Poland, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Azerbaijan, July. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Bosnia and Herzegovina, June. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

  • World Bank. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Ukraine, October. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGee, R.W. (2008). Summary and Analysis of Country Studies. In: McGee, R.W. (eds) Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84831-0_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics