Over the last ten years, supply chain vulnerability (SCV) and its managerial counterpart supply chain risk management (SCRM) have received considerable attention by practitioners as well as academics (see for reviews Jüttner 2005; Peck 2006). Disruptions in global supply chains caused by a sequence of large scale environmental, political and company-driven events provide vivid illustrations of the entwined global marketplace that characterize today’s supply chains. At the same time, they have demonstrated the limitations of conventional risk management approaches emerging from a single company context. However, supply chain risk management approaches must have a broader scope than that of a single organization in order to capture the risks caused by the linkages among multiple supply chain parties and their subsequent ripple effects. Thus, based on the consensus in the literature that a supply chain at its simplest degree of complexity comprises at least three entities: a company, a supplier and a customer (Mentzer et al. 2001), it has been suggested that any approach to managing risks in the supply chain should adopt the same cross-company, supply chain orientation (Jüttner et al. 2003; Ziegenbein 2007). This condition increases the complexity of the managerial approaches sought as well as the resource requirements for their successful implementation. As a consequence, it appears that mainly large companies that typically have substantial control over supply chain activities and possibly act as the ‘channel captain’ are in position to effectively manage supply chain risk. The few existing contributions reporting on companies’ experiences with the implementation of SCRM seem to support this view. They seem to focus on large, international enterprises with abundant know how and financial resources such as the telecommunication provider Ericcson (Norrman and Jansson 2004). For small and medium sized businesses (SMEs), which are increasingly trading globally and therefore exposed to similar global supply chain risks as their large international firm counterparts, it is more difficult to manage risks since they are missing the necessary resources, structures and processes (Ritchie and Brindley 2000). This is even more concerning when considering the fact that SMEs are often affected disproportionately by supply chain risks. As second or third tier suppliers, in many supply chains they have to shoulder a significant size of the risk burden which is pushed upstream in the supply chain by the other parties. In a large project on SCV conducted in England in the time between 2000 and 2003, interviews with managing directors of 15 SMEs revealed that the requirements of SMEs for SCRM approaches differ substantially from those of larger businesses (Cranfield University 2003).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aitken J, Christopher M and Towill D (2002) Understanding, implementing and exploiting agility and leanness, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol 5, No 1, pp 59-74
Argyries C (1994) Knowledge for Action, San Francisco, Cambridge University Press
Chopra S and Sodhi M (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply chain breakdown, MIT Sloan Management Review, 2004, Vol 46, No 1, pp 53-61
Cranfield School of Management (2003) Creating Resilient Supply Chains: A Practical Guide, Cranfield School of Management: Department of Transport
Christopher M (2005) Managing risk in the supply chain, Chapter in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value-Adding Networks, 3rd ed, FT Prentice Hall, Harlow
Christopher M and Lee H (2004) Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol 34, No 5, pp 388-386
Harland C, Brenchley R and Walker H (2003) Risk in supply networks, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol 9, No 2, pp 51-62
Johnson E (2001) Learning from toys: Lessons in managing supply chain risk from the toy industry, California Management Review, Vol 43, No 3, pp 106
Jüttner U (2005) Supply chain risk management - Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol 16, No 1, pp 120
Jüttner U, Peck H and Christopher M (2003) Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research, International Journal of Logistics, Vol 6, No 4, pp 197-210
Kiser J and Cantrell G (2006) Steps to managing risk, Supply Chain Management Review, Vol 10, No 3, pp 12-17
Lambert DM and Pohlen TL (2001) Supply chain metrics, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol 12, No 1, pp 1-19
March JG and Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking, Management Science, Vol 33, No 11, pp 1404-1418
Mentzer J, DeWitt W, Keebler J and Min S (2001) Defining supply chain management, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol 22, No 2, pp 1-25
Norrman A and Jansson U (2004) Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol 34, No 5, pp 434-456
Peck H (2006) Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol 9, No 2, pp 127-142
Reason P and Bradbury H (2001) Handbook of Action Research, London, Sage
Ritchie B and Brindley C (2000) Disintermediation, disintegration and risk in the SME global supply chain, Management Decision, Vol 38, No 8, pp 575-583
Sheffi Y (2005) The Resilient Enterprise - Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage, The MIT Press, Cambridge
Supply Chain Council (2006) Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model, Version 8.0, Pittsburgh: Supply Chain Council
Svensson G (2002) A conceptual framework of vulnerability in firms’ inbound and outbound logistics flows, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol 32, No 2, pp 110-134
Waser B and Hanisch C (2005) Gestaltung der Wertschöpfungskette Schweizer ProduktionsUnternehmen im internationalen Wettbewerb, Mitteilungen aus der PI-Erhebung 2003, Switzerland (in German)
Wu T, Blackhurst J and Chidambaram V (2006) A model for inbound supply risk analysis, Computers in Industry, Vol 57, pp 350-365
Ziegenbein A (2007) Supply Chain Risk - Identification, Assessment and Mitigation, Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag ETH Zurich (in German)
Zsidisin G (2003) Managerial perceptions of supply risk, Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, Vol 39, pp 14-25
Zsidisin G, Ellram L, Carter J and Cavinato J (2004) An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2004, Vol 34, No 5, pp 397-413
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jüttner, U., Ziegenbein, A. (2009). Supply Chain Risk Management for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses. In: Zsidisin, G.A., Ritchie, B. (eds) Supply Chain Risk. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 124. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79934-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79934-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79933-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79934-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)