This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abma, T. A. (2005). Responsive evaluation: Its meaning and special contribution to health promotion. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 279–289.
Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Hassocks, UK: Harvester Press.
Bisset, S., Cargo, M., Delormier, T., Macauley, A., & Potvin, L. (2004). Legitimizing diabetes as a community health issue: a case analysis of an Aboriginal community in Canada. Health Promotion International, 19, 317–326.
Blackburn, H., Luepker, R. V., Kline, F. G., Bracht, N., Carlaw, R., Jacobs, D., et al. (1984). The Minnesota Heart Health Program: A research and demonstration project in cardiovascular disease prevention. In J. D. Matarazzo, N. E. Miller, S. M. Weiss, J. A. Herd & S. M. Weiss (Eds.), Behavioral health: A handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention (pp. 1171–1178). Silver Spring, MD: John Wiley & Sons.
Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Genève: Ed. Droz.
Brown, P. (1995). The role of the evaluator in comprehensive community initiatives. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, &; C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Concepts, methods and contexts (pp. 201–225). New York: Aspen Institute.
Campbell, D. T. (1984). Can we be scientific in applied social science? In: R. F. Connor, D. G. Altman, & C. Jackson (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual, Vol 9 (pp. 26–48). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Carleton, R. A., Lasater, T. M., Assaf, A., Lefebvre, R. C., & McKinlay, S. M. (1987). The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: 1. An experiment in population-based disease prevention. The Rhode Island Medical Journal, 70, 533–538.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation; Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système. Paris: Seuil.
Farquhar, J. W., Fortmann, S. P., Maccoby, N., Haskell, W. L., Williams, P. T., Flora, J. A., et al. (1985). The stanford five city project: Design and methods. American Journal of Epidemiology, 122, 323–334.
Farquhar, S. A., Parker, E. A., Schulz, A. J., & Israel, B. A. (2006). Application of qualitative methods in program planning for health promotion interventions. Health Promotion Practice, 7, 234–242.
Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of -promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451–474
Gendron, S. (2001). La pratique participative en santé publique, l’émergence d’un paradigme. Montréal: Thèse de doctorat présentée à l’Université de Montréal. Retrieved in January 2008 from : http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-15-2013&FMT=7& DID=726370931&RQT=309&attempt=1
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discoveries of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Guba, Y., & Lincoln, E. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Hartz, Z. A., Denis, J-L., Moreira, E., & Matida, A. (2008). From knowledge to action: challenges and opportunities for increasing the use of evaluation in health promotion policies and practices. In L. Potvin & D. V. McQueen (Eds.), Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: Values and research. New York: Springer.
Hawe, P., & Riley, T. (2005). Ecological theory in practice: Illustrations from a community-based intervention to promote the health of recent mothers. Prevention Science, 6, 227–236.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lantz, P. M., Viruell-Fuentes, E., Israel, B. A., Softley, D., Guzman, R. (2001). Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 495–507.
Latour, B. (2006). Changer de société – Refaire de la sociologie. Paris: La découverte.
Le Breton, D. (2004). L’interactionisme symbolique. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Levy, R. (1994). Croyance et doute: une vision paradigmatique des méthodes qualitatives. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en santé, 1, 92–100.
Mark, M. M., & Henry, G. T. (2004). The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence. Evaluation, 10, 35–57.
Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation. An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mercille, G. (2008). A realist approach to synthesizing evaluation results. In L. Potvin & D. V. McQueen (eds.), Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: Values and research. New York: Springer.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation. The new century text. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London UK: Sage.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realistic evaluation. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 362–367). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Poland, B., Frohlich, K. L., & Cargo, M. (2008). Context as a fundamental dimension of health-promotion program evaluation. In L. Potvin & D. V. McQueen (Eds.), Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: Values and research. New York: Springer.
Potvin, L., Cargo, M., McComber, A., Delormier, T., Macaulay, A. C. (2003) Implementing Participatory Intervention and Research in Communities: Lessons from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1295–1305.
Potvin, L., Gendron, S., & Bilodeau, A. (2006). Três posturas ontológicas concernentes à natureza dos programas de saúde: implicações para a avaliação. In: M. L. M. Bosi & F. J. Mercado (Eds.), Avaloaçao qualitative de programas de saude. Enfoques emergentes. Petropolis, Brazil: Vozes Editorial.
Potvin, L., & McQueen, D. V. (2008). Practical dilemmas for health-promotion evaluation. In L. Potvin & D. V. McQueen (Eds.), Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: Values and research. New York: Springer.
Preskill, H., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Current and developing conceptions of use: Evaluation use topical interest group survey results. Evaluation Practice, 18, 209–225.
Savage, C. L., Xu, Y., Lee, R., Rose, B. L., Kappesser, M., Anthony, S. P. (2006). A case study in the use of community-based participatory research in public health nursing. Public Health Nursing, 23, 472–487.
Schulz, A. J., Isreal, B. A., Parker, E. A., Lockett, M., Hill, Y., & Wills, R. (2001). The east side village health worker partnership: Integrating research with action to reduce health disparities. Public Health Reports, 116, 548–557.
Shadish, W. R., Jr., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. L. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Springett, J. (2001). Participatory approaches to evaluation in health promotion. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. V. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett, & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and perspectives (pp. 83–105). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No 92.
Stake, R. E. (Ed.) (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus Ohio: Merril.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluative research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Thurston, W. E., Graham, J. & Hatfield, J. (2003). Evaluability assessment a catalyst for program change and improvement. Evaluation and the Health Profession, 26, 206–221.
Thurston, W. E., & Potvin, L. (2003). Evaluability assessment: A tool for incorporating evaluation in social change programs. Evaluation, 9, 453–469.
Weber, M. (1952). The essentials of bureaucratic organization: An ideal-type construction. In R. K. Merton, A. P. Gray, B. Hockey, & H. Selvin (Eds.), Reader in bureaucracy (pp. 18, 21–22). New York: Free Press.
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation. Methods for studying programs and policy, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wholey, J. S., & Newcomer, K. E. (Eds.) (1989). Improving government performance : evaluation strategies for strengthening public agencies and programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Potvin, L., Bisset, S. (2008). There Is More to Methodology than Method. In: Potvin, L., McQueen, D.V., Hall, M., de Salazar, L., Anderson, L.M., Hartz, Z.M. (eds) Health Promotion Evaluation Practices in the Americas. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79733-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79733-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79732-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79733-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)