Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation by Streptococcus mutans

  • Dilani Senadheera
  • Dennis G. CvitkovitchEmail author
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 631)


Streptococcus mutans is the primary causative agent involved in dental caries in humans. Among important virulence factors of this pathogen, its ability to form and sustain a polysaccharide-encased biofilm (commonly called dental plaque) is vital not only to its survival and persistence in the oral cavity, but also for its pathogenicity as well. This chapter focuses on the S. mutans’ biofilm phenotype and how this mode of growth is regulated by its density-dependent quorum sensing (QS) system primarily comprised of the Competence Stimulating Peptide (CSP) and the ComD/ComE two-component signal transduction system. In addition to biofilm formation, the CSP-mediated QS system in S. mutans also affects its acidogenicity, aciduricity, genetic transformation and bacteriocin production. Interestingly, it has also been discovered that these properties are optimally expressed in cells derived from a biofilm as opposed to a free-floating planktonic mode of growth. Hence, strategies targeting S. mutans’ QS system to attenuate biofilm formation and/or virulence are currently being used to develop therapeutic or preventative measures against dental caries. Recently, it was discovered that the addition of CSP in large concentrations (relative to amounts used for normal competence development) resulted in growth arrest and eventual cell death, thus paving way for CSP-mediated targeted killing of S. mutants. In addition to the QS system, effects of other two-component signal transduction systems on the biofilm phenotype of S. mutans are also discussed.


Dental Caries Streptococcus Pneumoniae Quorum Sense Streptococcus Mutans Bacteriocin Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN. Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 2000:183–215.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    West AH, Stock AM. Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems. Trends Biochem Sci 2000:369–376.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bassler BL. How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol 1999:582–587.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassler BL, Small talk. Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell 2002:421–424.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henke JM, Bassler BL. Bacterial social engagements. Trends Cell Biol 2004:648–656.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kleerebezem M, Quadri LE. Peptide pheromone-dependent regulation of antimicrobial peptide production in Gram-positive bacteria: a case of multicellular behavior. Peptides 2001:1579–1596.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleerebezem M, Quadri LE, Kuipers OP et al. Quorum sensing by peptide pheromones and two-component signal-transduction systems in Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 1997:895–904.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suntharalingam P, Cvitkovitch DG. Quorum sensing in streptococcal biofilm formation. Trends Microbiol 2005:3–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alloing G, Martin B, Granadel C et al. Development of competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae: pheromone autoinduction and control of quorum sensing by the oligopeptide permease. Mol Microbiol 1998:75–83.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Kievit TR, Iglewski BH. Quorum sensing, gene expression and Pseudomonas biofilms. Methods Enzymol 1999:117–128.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kleerebezem M. Quorum sensing control of lantibiotic production; nisin and subtilin autoregulate their own biosynthesis. Peptides 2004:1405–1414.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazazzera BA. Quorum sensing and starvation: signals for entry into stationary phase. Curr Opin Microbiol 2000:177–182.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li YH, Hanna MN, Svensäter G et al. Cell density modulates acid adaptation in Streptococcus mutans: implications for survival in biofilms. J Bacteriol 2001:6875–6884.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loo CY, Corliss DA, Ganeshkumar N. Streptococcus gordonii biofilm formation: identification of genes that code for biofilm phenotypes. J Bacteriol 2000:1374–1382.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fuqua WC, Winans DA, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol 1994:269–275.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bassler BL, Greenberg EP, Stevens AM. Cross-species induction of luminescence in the quorum-sensing bacterium Vibrio harveyi. J Bacteriol 1997:40, 43–45.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dunlap PV. Quorum regulation of luminescence in Vibrio fischeri. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 1999:5–12.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Finch R, Pritchard D, Byeroft B et al. Quorum sensing: a novel target for anti-infective therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998:569–571.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999:1318–1322.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fux CA, Costerton JW, Stewart PS et al. Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol 2005:34–40.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG et al. Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu Rev Microbiol 2002:187–209.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sutherland I. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology 2001:3–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kolenbrander PE. Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions and genetic systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 2000:413–437.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Ann Rev Microbiol 2000:49–79.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fux CA, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L et al. Bacterial biofilms: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Expert Rev Anti Infeet Ther 2003:667–683.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Costerton W, Veeh R, Shirtliff M et al. The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J Clin Invest 2003:1466–1477.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001:135–138.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gilmore KS, Srinivas P, Akins DR et al. Growth, development and gene expression in a persistent Streptococcus gordonii biofilm. Infect Immun 2003:4759–4766.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keren I, Shah D, Spoering A et al. Specialized persister cells and the mechanism of multidrug tolerance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2004:8172–8180.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Donlan RM. Role of biofilms in antimicrobial resistance. Asaio J 2000:S47–52.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li YH, Lau PC, Lee JH, Ellen RP et al. Natural genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans growing in biofilms. J Bacteriol 2001:897–908.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Qi F, Kreth J, Lévesque CM, Kay O et al. Peptide pheromone induced cell death of Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005:321–326.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tanzer JM. Dental caries is a transmissible infectious disease: the Keyes and Fitzgerald revolution. J Dent Res 1995:1536–1542.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loesche WJ, Straffon LH. Longitudinal investigation of the role of Streptococcus mutans in human fissure decay. Infect Immun 1979:498–507.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Masuda N, Tsutsumi N, Sobue S et al. Longitudinal survey of the distribution of various serotypes of Streptococcus mutans in infants. J Clin Microbiol 1979:497–502.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Walter RG. A longitudinal study of caries development in initially caries-free naval recruits. J Dent Res 1982:1405–1407.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alaluusua S, Renkonen OV. Streptococcus mutans establishment and dental caries experience in children from 2 to 4 years old. Scand J Dent Res 1983:453–457.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kingman A, Little W, Gomez I et al. Salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli and dental caries experiences in a US adolescent population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988:98–103.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Curtiss R III. Genetic analysis of Streptococcus mutans virulence. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1985:253–277.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kuramitsu HK. Virulence factors of mutans streptococci: role of molecular genetics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1993:159–176.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kuramitsu HK. Virulence properties of oral bacteria: impact of molecular biology. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2001:35–36.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tanzer JM, Freedman ML, Fitzgerald RJ et al. Diminished virulence of glucan synthesis-defective mutants of Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun 1974:197–203.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li YH, Tang N, Aspiras MB et al. A quorum-sensing signaling system essential for genetic competence in Streptococcus mutans is involved in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 2002:2699–2708.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pakula R, Walczak W. On the nature of competence of transformable streptococci. J Gen Microbiol 1963:125–133.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tomasz A, Hotchkiss RD. Regulation of the transformability of pneumococcal cultures by macromolecular cell products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1964:480–487.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tomasz A. Control of the competent state in Pneumococcus by a hormone-like cell product: an example for a new type of regulatory mechanism in bacteria. Nature 1965:155–159.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Havarstein LS, Coomaraswamy G, Morrison DA. An unmodified heptadecapeptide pheromone induces competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995:11140–11144.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Havarstein LS, Diep DB, Nes IF. A family of bacteriocin ABC transporters carry out proteolytic processing of their substrates concomitant with export. Mol Microbiol 1995:229–240.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cheng Q, Campbell EA, Naughton AM et al. The com locus controls genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 1997:683–692.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Håvarstein LS, Gaustad P, Nes IF et al. Identification of the streptococcal competence-pheromone receptor. Mol Microbiol 1996:863–869.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pestova EV, Havarstein LS, Morrison DA. Regulation of competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae by an auto-induced peptide pheromone and a two-component regulatory system. Mol Microbiol 1996:853–862.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Claverys JP, Havarstein LS. Extracellular-peptide control of competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Front Biosci 2002:d1798–1814.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Havarstein LS, Morrison DA. Quorum sensing and peptide pheromones in streptococcal competence for genetic transformation in Cell-cell signaling in Bacteria. G.M.a.W. Dunny SC, Ed, ASM Press, Washington, DC 1999:9–26.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cvitkovitch DG. Genetic competence and transformation in oral streptococci. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001:217–243.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Havarstein LS, Hakenbeck R, Gaustad P. Natural competence in the genus Strettococcus: evidence that streptococci can change pherotype by interspecies recombinational exchanges. J Bacteriol 1997:6589–6594.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Syvitski RT, Tian XL, Sampara K et al. Structure-Activity Analysis of Quorum-Sensing Signaling Peptides from Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 2006.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Aspiras MB, Ellen RP, Cvitkovitch DG. ComX activity of Streptococcus mutans growing in biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004:167–174.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kreth J, Hung DC, Merritt J et al. The response regulator ComE in Streptococcus mutans functions both as a transcription activator of mutacin production and repressor of CSP biosynthesis. Microbiology 2007, In press.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Peterson SN, Sung CK, Cline R et al. Identification of competence pheromone responsive genes in Streptococcus pneumoniae by use of DNA microarrays. Mol Microbiol 2004:1051–1070.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ween O, Gaustad P, Havarstein LS. Identification of DNA binding sites for ComE, a key regulator of natural competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 1999:817–827.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lee MS, Morrison DA. Identification of a new regulator in Streptococcus pneumoniae linking quorum sensing to competence for genetic transformation. J Bacteriol 1999:5004–5016.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Luo P, Li H, Morrison DA. ComX is a unique link between multiple quorum sensing outputs and competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 2003:623–633.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Luo P, Morrison DA. Transient association of an alternative sigma factor, ComX, with RNA polymerase during the period of competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol 2003:349–358.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Steinmoen H, Knutsen E, Havarstein LS. Induction of natural competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae triggers lysis and DNA release from a subfraction of the cell population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002:7681–7686.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Steinmoen H, Tiegen A, Havarstein LS. Competence-induced cells of Streptococcus pneumoniae lyse competence-deficient cells of the same strain during cocultivation. J Bacteriol 2003:7176–7183.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kreth J, Merritt J, Zhu L et al. Cell density-and ComE-dependent expression of a group of mutacin and mutacin-like genes in Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2006:11–17.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Senadheera D, Lee AWC, Hung DC et al. Streptococcus mutans quorum-sensing system controls gtfB/C/D, ftf and gbpB expression. General meeting hosted by the American Society for microbiology. Toronto, Canada 2007.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Senadheera D, Mair R, Cvitkovitch DG. Streptococcus mutans competence stimulating peptide affects gtfB/C and vicR/K expression and biofilm structure. Biofilms conference hosted by the American Society for Microbiology. Quebec, Canada 2007.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Petersen FC, Pecharki D, Scheie AA. Biofilm mode of growth of Streptococcus intermedius favored by a competence-stimulating signaling peptide. J Bacteriol 2004:6327–6331.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sablon E, Contreras B, Vandamme E. Antimicrobial peptides of lactic acid bacteria: mode of action, genetics and biosynthesis. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2000:21–60.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Novak J, Caufield PW, Miller EJ. Isolation and biochemical characterization of a novel lantibiotic mutacin from Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 1994:4316–4320.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Qi F, Chen P, Caufield PW. Purification of mutacin III from group III Streptococcus mutans UA787 and genetic analyses of mutacin III biosynthesis genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999:3880–3887.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Qi F, Chen P, Caufield PW. Purification and biochemical characterization of mutacin I from the group I strain of Streptococcus mutans, CH43 and genetic analysis of mutacin I biosynthesis genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000:3221–3229.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Qi F, Chen P, Caufield PW. The group I strain of Streptococcus mutans, UA140, produces both the lantibiotic mutacin I and a nonlantibiotic bacteriocin, mutacin IV. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001:15–21.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Matsumoto-Nakano M, Kuramitsu HK. Role of bateriocin immunity proteins in the antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 2006:8095–8102.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Senadheera MD et al. A VicRK signal transduction system in Streptococcus mutans affects gtfBCD, gbpB and ftf expression, biofilm formation and genetic competence development. J Bacteriol 2005:4064–76.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Qi YH, Lau PC, Tang N et al. Noval two-component regulatory system involved in biofilm formation and acid resistance in Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 2002:6333–6342.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Qi F, Merritt J, Lux R et al. Inactivation of the ciaH Gene in Streptococcus mutans diminishes mutacin production and competence development, alters sucrose-dependent biofilm formation and reduces stress tolerance. Infect Immun 2004:895–899.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Biswas S, Biswas I. Regulation of the glucosyltransferase (gtfBC) operon by CovR in Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 2006:988–998.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Idone V, Brendtro S, Gillespie R et al. Effect of an orphan response regulator on Streptococcus mutans sucrose-dependent adherence and cariogenesis. Infect Immun 2003:4351–4360.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oral Microbiology, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations