Concerns About Dose and Underutilization of Twelve-Step Programs: Models, Scales, and Theory that Inform Treatment Planning

Chapter
Part of the Recent Developments in Alcoholism book series (RDIA, volume 18)

Abstract

Researchers have observed that a majority of addicted persons who are encouraged and facilitated by treatment providers to attend twelve-step (TS) programs either drop out or sporadically use twelve-step programs following treatment. This is troubling given considerable evidence of TS program benefits associated with regular weekly attendance and ubiquitous reliance by treatment professionals on these programs to provide important support services. This chapter reviews and advances theory of TS utilization and dose that is supported by prior research, multivariate models, and scales that predict risk of TS meeting underutilization. Advancing theory should organize and clarify the process of initial utilization, guide intervention development, and improve adherence of TS program referrals, all of which should lead to improved treatment planning and better outcomes. Three theories are integrated to explain processes that may influence TS program dose: the health belief model, self-determination theory (motivational theory), and a person-in-organization cultural fit theory. Four multidimensional scales developed specifically to predict participation are described. Implications for practice and future research are considered in a final discussion. Information contained in this chapter raises awareness of the need for TS-focused treatments to focus on achieving weekly attendance during and after treatment.

Keywords

Motivational Interview Health Belief Model Involvement Scale Specific Health Service Meeting Attendance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, B., O'Grady, K., Farrell, E., Flechner, I., & Nurco. D. (2001). Factors associated with frequency of 12-step attendance by drug abuse clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 147–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnett, J. R., Vaughan, M. J., & Moody, D. (1997). The importance of person-organization value congruence for female students joining college sororities. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 297–300.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, T., & Williamson, D. (1995). Harmful effects of drinking and the use and perceived effectiveness of treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 611–615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Champion, V. (1996). Predicting mammography utilization through model generation. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 1, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cloud, R. N. (2000). Prediction of Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation from pretreatment factors: Methods and theory to inform provider referrals. Dissertation Abstracts International, Humanities and Social Sciences, 61(2-A), p. 766.Google Scholar
  7. Cloud, R. N. (2004). Factors that influence posttreatment attendance in alcoholics anonymous: Theory and methods to inform provider referrals. The International Journal of Self-Help and Self-Care, 2, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cloud, R. N., Besel, K., Bledsoe, L., Golder, L., McKiernan, P., Patterson, D., et al. (2006). Adapting motivational interviewing strategies to increase posttreatment 12-step meeting attendance. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 24(3), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cloud, R. N., Golder, S., Rowan, N., & Van Zyl, M. A. (2007). Measuring risk of Alcoholics Anonymous and narcotics anonymous dropout: Initial development and psychometric testing of the twelve-step ambivalence scale (TSAS). Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  10. Cloud, R. N., Rowan, N., Wulff, D., & Golder, S. (2007). Posttreatment 12 step program affiliation and dropout: Theoretical model and qualitative exploration. Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 7(4), 49–74.Google Scholar
  11. Cloud, R. N., Ziegler, C., & Blondell, R. D. (2004). What is Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation? Beliefs and activities essential for twelve-step recovery. Substance Use and Misuse, 39, 1119–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connors, G. J., Tonigan, J. S., & Miller, W. R. (2001). A longitudinal model of A.A. affiliation, participation, and outcome: Retrospective study of the project MATCH outpatient and aftercare samples. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 62, 817–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. DiNitto, D. M., Webb, D. K., Allen, R., Morrison-Orton, D., & Wambach, K. G. (2002). Self-help group meeting attendance among clients with dual diagnosis. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 33, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emrick, C. D. (1987). Alcoholics anonymous: Affiliation processes and effectiveness as treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 11, 416–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emrick, C. D. (1989). Alcoholics anonymous: Membership characteristics and effectiveness as treatment. In M. Galanter (Ed.), Recent developments in alcoholism: Treatment Research (Vol. 17, pp. 37–53). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Emrick, C. D. (1994). Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step groups. In M. Galanter, & H. D. Kleber (Eds.), American psychiatric press textbook of substance abuse treatment (pp. 351–358). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  17. Emrick, C. D., Tonigan, J. S., Montgomery, H., & Little, L. (1993). Alcoholics anonymous: What is currently known? In B. S. McCrady, & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Research on alcoholics anonymous: Opportunities and alternatives (pp. 41–78). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Fiorentine, R. (1999). After drug treatment: Are 12-step programs effective in maintaining abstinence? American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 93–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiorentine, R. (2001). Counseling frequency and the effectiveness of outpatient drug treatment: Revisiting the conclusion of “more is better.” The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 617–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. (2000a). Drug treatment and 12-step program participation: The additive effects of integrated recovery activities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. P. (2000b). Exploring the additive effects of drug misuse treatment and twelve-step involvement: Does twelve-step ideology matter? Substance Use & Misuse, 35, 367–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hettema, J., Steele, J., & Miller, W. R. (2005). Motivational Interviewing. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 91–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphreys, K., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (1994). Applying a stress and coping framework to research on mutual help organizations. Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Humphreys, K., Kaskutas, L., & Weisner, C. (1998a). The Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation scale: Development, reliability and norms for diverse treated and untreated populations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 22, 974–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Humphreys, K., Kaskutas, L., & Weisner, C. (1998b). The relationship of pre-treatment Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation with problem severity, social resources and treatment history. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 49, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Humphreys, K., Moos, R. H., & Finney, J. W. (1996). Life domains, alcoholics anonymous, and role incumbency in the 3-year course of problem drinking. Journal of Mental Disorders, 184, 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahler, C. W., Kelly, J. F., Strong, D. R., Stuart, G. L., & Brown, R. A. (2006). Development and initial validation of a 12-step participation expectancies questionnaire. Journal of studies on alcohol, 67, 538–542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahler, C. W., Read, J. P., Stuart, G. L., Ramsey, S. E., & McCrady, B. S. (2004). Motivational enhancement for 12-Step involvement among patients undergoing alcohol detoxification. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 736–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaskutas, L. A., Weisner, C., Lee, M., & Humphreys, K. (1999). Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation at treatment intake among White and Black Americans. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60, 810–816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly, J. F., & Moos, R. (2003). Dropout from 12-step self-help groups: Prevalence, predictors, and counteracting treatment influences, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 241–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kingree, J. (1995). Understanding gender differences in psychosocial functioning and treatment retention. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 21, 267–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kingree, J., Simpson, A., Thompson, M., McCrady, B., & Tonigan, J. (2007). The predictive validity of the survey of readiness for Alcoholics Anonymous participation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 68, 141–148.Google Scholar
  33. Kingree, J., Simpson, A., Thompson, M., McCrady, B., Tonigan, J., & Lautenschlager, G. (2006). The development and initial validation of the survey of readiness for Alcoholics Anonymous participation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 453–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laudet, A. B., Magura, S, Cleland C. M, Vogel, H. S, & Knight, E. L., (2003). Predictors of retention in dual-focus self-help groups, Community Mental Health Journal, 39, 281–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laudet, A. B. (2003). Attitudes and beliefs about 12-step groups among addiction treatment clients and clinicians: Toward identifying obstacles to participation. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 2017–2047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luke, D. A., Roberts, L., & Rappaport, J. (1993). Individual, group context, and individual group fit predictors of self-help group attendance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Majer, J. M., Leonard, A. J., Ferrari, J. R., Venable, L. B., & Olson, B. D. (2002). Social support ad self-efficacy for abstinence: Is peer identification an issue? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 209–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mankowski, E. S., Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. H. (2001). Individual and contextual predictors of involvement in twelve-step self-help groups after substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 537–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markland, D., Ryan, R. M., Tobin, V. J., & Rollnick, S. (2005). Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 24, 811–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCrady, B. S., Epstein, E. E., & Hirsch, L. S. (1996). Issues in the implementation of a randomized clinical trial that includes alcoholics anonymous: Studying A.A.-related behaviors during treatment. Journal-of-Studies-on-Alcohol, 57, 604–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McKay, J. R., McLellan, A. T., Alterman, A. I., Cacciola, J. S., Rutherford, M. J., Megan, J., et al. (1998). Predictors of participation in aftercare sessions and self-help groups following completion of intensive outpatient treatment for substance abuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 152–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McKellar, J., Stewart, E., & Humphreys, K. (2003). Alcoholics Anonymous involvement and positive alcohol-related outcomes: Cause, consequence, or just a correlate? A prospective 2-year study of 2,319 alcohol-dependent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 302–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change (2 nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Morgenstern, J., Kahler, C. W., Frey, R. M., & Labouvie, E. (1996). Modeling therapeutic response to 12-step treatment: Optimal responders, nonresponders, and partial responders. Journal of Substance Abuse, 8, 45–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgenstern, J., LaBouvie, E., McCrady, B. S., Kahler, C. W., & Frey, R. M. (1997). Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous after treatment: A study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 768–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Montgomery, H. A., Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Differences among A.A. groups: Implication for research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 54, 502–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Moos, R., Schaefer, J., Andrassy, J., & Moos, B. (2001). Outpatient mental health care, self-help groups and patients’ one-year treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 273–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moyers, T., & Martin, T. (2005). Therapist influence on client language during motivational interviewing session, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 245–251.Google Scholar
  49. Moyers, Miller, & Hendrickson (2005). How Does Motivational Interviewing Work? Therapist Interpersonal Skill Predicts Client Involvement Within Motivational Interviewing Sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2005, 73(4), 590–598.Google Scholar
  50. Nageotte, C., Sullivan, G., Duan, N., & Camp, P. (1997). Medication compliance among the seriously mentally ill in a public mental health system. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32, 49–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nowinski, J., Baker, S., and Carroll, K. (1992). Twelve-step facilitation therapy manual. National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse Project MATCH Monograph Series, Volume 1, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  52. O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person in organizational fit. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ouimette, P. C., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (1997). Twelve-step and cognitive behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 230–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. PMRG (Project MATCH Research Group; 1997). Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 7–29.Google Scholar
  55. Rowan, N. L., Faul, A. C., & Cloud, R. N., & Huber, R. (2006). The higher power relationship scale: A validation. Social Work Practice and the Addictions, 6, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1989). Research methods for social work (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  58. Schilling, R. F., El-Bassel, N., Finch, J. B., Roman, R. J., & Hanson, M. (2002). Motivational Interviewing to encourage self-help participation following alcohol detoxification. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 711–730. Google Scholar
  59. Schneider, B, Smith, D. B, & Paul, M. C. (2001). P◊E fit and the attraction-selection model of organizational functioning: Introduction and overview. In Miriam Erez and Uwe Kleinbeck (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 231–246). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  60. Sisson, R. W., & Mallams, J. H. (1981). The use of systematic encouragement and community access procedures to increase attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous and Alanon meetings. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 8, 371–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Snow, M. G., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (1994). Processes of change in Alcoholics Anonymous: Maintenance factors in long-term sobriety. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 362–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Strecher, V., & Rosenstock, I. (1997). The health belief model. In K. Glanz, F. Lewis, & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education (2 nd ed., pp. 41–59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  63. Timko, C., Billow, R., & DeBenedetti, A. (2006). Determinants of 12-step group affiliation and moderators of the affiliation-abstinence relationship. Drug and Alcohol Dependences, 83, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Timko, C., DeBenedetti, A., & Billow, R. (2006). Intensive referral to 12-Step self-help groups and 6-month substance use disorder outcomes. Addiction, 101, 678–688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Timko, C., Finney, J. W., Moos, R. H., Moos, B. S., & Steinbaum, D. P. (1993). The process of treatment selection among previously untreated help-seeking problem drinkers. Journal of Substance Abuse, 5, 203–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tonigan, J. S., Ashcroft, F., & Miller, W. R. (1995). A.A. group dynamics and 12-Step activity. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 616–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Tonigan, J. S., Bogenschutz, M. P., & Miller, W. R. (2005). Is alcoholism typology a predictor of both Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation and disaffiliation after treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tonigan, J. S., Connors, G. J., & Miller, W. R. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous involvement (AAI) Scale: Reliability and norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tonigan, J. S., Connors, G. J., & Miller, W. R. (2003). Participation and involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous. In T. F. Babor, & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), Treatment matching in alcoholism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tonigan, J. S., & Hiller-Sturmhoefel, S. (1995). Alcoholics Anonymous: Who benefits? Alcohol-Health-and-Research-World, 18, 308–310. Google Scholar
  71. Tonigan, J. S., Miller, W.R., & Schermer, C. (2002). Atheist, Agnostics and Alcoholics Anonymous, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 534–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Tonigan, J. S., Miller, W. R., Juarez, P., & Villanueva, M. (2002). Utilization of A.A. by Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White clients receiving outpatient alcohol treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 215–218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Tonigan, J. S., Toscova, R., & Miller, W. (1996). Meta-analysis of the literature on Alcoholics Anonymous: Sample and study characteristics moderate findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 65–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E., & Rippens, P. D., (2003). Different variables are associated with help-seeking patterns and long-term outcome among problem drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vansteenkiste, M., & Sheldon, K. M. (2006). There’s nothing more practical than a good theory: Integrating motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 63–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weiss, R. D., Griffin, M. L., Gallop, R., Luborsky, L., Siqueland, L., Frank, A., et al. (2000). Predictors of self-help group attendance in cocaine dependent patients. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 714–719.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kent School of Social WorkUniversity of LouisvilleLouisville
  2. 2.Department of Public Health SciencesClemson UniversityClemson

Personalised recommendations