• Lee Ann Kaskutas
Part of the Recent Developments in Alcoholism book series (RDIA, volume 18)

This section takes up the question of AA membership. Throughout this volume (and in the broader alcohol literature as well), authors have noted that AA is the most widely used source of help for alcohol problems. This remarkable finding leads to compelling research questions. Is there a profile of the AA attender? If so, then what is it? Are certain people less likely to attend? What predicts attendance? What predicts meeting drop-out following a period of meeting attendance? Should treatment and healthcare providers encourage AA attendance? How should they do that? The four chapters in this section attempt to address these questions. Taken together, they provide the reader with a sense of what distinguishes AA engagers from disengagers, offering providers tools for assessing roadblocks to AA attendance and advice for facilitating involvement in twelve-step programs for the addictions.

The first chapter by Kaskutas, Ye, Greenfield, Witbrodt, and Bondprovides multiple perspectives on...


Problem Drinker General Population Survey Meeting Attendance Project Match Specialty Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cloud, R. N. (2004). Factors that influence post-treatment attendance in Alcoholics Anonymous: Theory and methods to inform provider referrals. The International Journal of Self-Help and Self-Care, 2, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cloud, R. N., Ziegler, C. H., & Blondell, R. D. (2004). What is Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation? Substance Use Misuse, 39(7), 1117–1136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Chou, P. S. (2006). Estimating the effect of help-seeking on achieving recovery from alcohol dependence. Addiction, 101 , 824–834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Donovan, D. M. (1999). Efficacy and effectiveness: Complementary findings from two multisite trials evaluating outcomes of alcohol treatments differing in theoretical orientations. Alcoholism Clinical Experimental Research, 23(3), 564–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donovan, D. M., Carroll, K. M., Kadden, R. M., Diclemente, C. C., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2003). Therapies for matching: Selection, development, implementation, and costs. In T. F. Babor, & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), Treatment matching in alcoholism (pp. 42–61), New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Donovan, D. M., Kadden, R. M., Diclemente, C. C., Carroll, K. M., R., L., Zweben, A., & Al., E. (1994). Issues in the selection and development of therapies in alcoholism treatment matching research. Journal of Studies Alcohol, 12(Supplement), 138–148.Google Scholar
  7. Donovan, D. M., & Wells, E. A. (2007). Tweaking 12-step: The potential role of 12-step self-help group involvement in methamphetamine recovery. Addiction, 102(Suppl 1), 121–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Floyd, A. S., Hoffmann, N. G., & Karno, M. P. (2001). Diagnosis, self-help, and maintenance care as key constructs in treatment research for “alcohol use disorders” (AUD). Substance Use Misuse, 36(4), 399–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenfield, T. K., Nayak, M., Bond, J., Ye, Y., & Midanik, L. T. (2006). Maximum quantity consumed and alcohol-related problems: assessing the most alcohol drunk with two measures. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 30(9), 1576–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaskutas, L. A. (1994). What do women get out of self help? Reasons for attending Women for Sobriety and Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11(3), 185–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaskutas, L. A. (1996). Pathways to self-help among Women for Sobriety. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 22(2), 259–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaskutas, L. A. (1998). Hip and helpful: Alcoholics Anonymous in Marin County, California. In I. Eisenbach-Stengl, & P. Rosenqvist (Eds.), Diversity in Unity: Studies of Alcoholics Anonymous in Eight Societies (pp. 25–53). Helsinki, Finland: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research.Google Scholar
  13. Kaskutas, L. A., Bond, J., & Humphreys, K. (2002). Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction, 97(7), 891–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaskutas, L. A., Turk, N., Bond, J., & Weisner, C. (2003). The role of religion, spirituality and Alcoholics Anonymous in sustained sobriety. Alcohol Treatment Quart, 21(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly, J. F., & Myers, M. G. (2007). Adolescents' participation in Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous: Review, implications, and future directions. Journals of Psychoactive Drugs, 39, 259–269.Google Scholar
  16. Kelly, J. F., Myers, M. G., & Brown, S. A. (2000). A multivariate process model of adolescent 12-step attendance and substance use outcome following inpatient treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(4), 376–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kingree, J. B., Simpson, A., Thompson, M., McCrady, B., Tonigan, J. S., & Lautenschlager, G. (2006). The development and initial evaluation of the survey of readiness for Alcoholics Anonymous participation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(4), 453–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCrady, B. S., Epstein, E. E., & Hirsch, L. S. (1999). Maintaining change after conjoint behavioral alcohol treatment for men: outcomes at 6 months. Addiction, 94(9), 1381–1396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCrady, B. S., & Miller, W. R. (Eds.). (1993). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and alternatives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Room, R., & Greenfield, T. (1993). Alcoholics Anonymous, other 12-step movements and psychotherapy in the U.S. population, 1990. Addiction, 88 : 555–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weisner, C., Schmidt, L., & Tam, T. W. (1995). Assessing bias in community-based prevalence estimates: towards an unduplicated count of problem drinkers and drug users. Addiction, 90(3), 391–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Witbrodt, J., & Kaskutas, L. A. (2005). Does diagnosis matter? Differential effects of 12-step participation and social networks on abstinence. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31 , 685–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alcohol Research GroupEmeryvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations