Pear Genomics

  • Toshiya Yamamoto
  • Elisabeth Chevreau
Part of the Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models book series (PGG, volume 6)

Pear, like the other pip fruit species apple and quince, belongs to the sub-family Maloideae in the Rosaceae, sharing a basic chromosome number of x = 17 which indicates a polyploidy origin. The genus Pyrus is believed to have arisen during the Tertiary period in the mountainous regions of western China. Dispersal and speciation is believed to have followed the mountain chains both east and west (Rubzov, 1944; Zeven and Zhukovsky, 1975). Wild pears can be found in the entire Eurasian zone. In Europe they are mostly Pyrus communis L. subsp. pyraster (L.) and in the Caucasus, P. caucasica (Fed.) Browicz. These pear trees produce small fruits of variable characteristics, which were probably picked and preserved dried by early humans. Domestication occurred from the better-fruited trees. As for apple, grafting played a key role in the diffusion of improved genotypes in Central Asia and in Eastern Mediterranean area. According to Hedrick et al. (1921), European pear culture was well established in Greece and cultivars with distinct names were propagated as early as 300 B.C. Oriental pears, which arose independently, were also grown in China for more than 2000 years (Kikuchi, 1946).


Linkage Group Fire Blight Japanese Pear Pear Cultivar European Pear 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abe K, and Kotobuki K (1998) Inheritance of high resistance to Venturia nashicola Tanaka et Yamamoto in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) and Chinese pear (P. ussuriensis Maxim.). J Japan Soc Hort Sci 67: 677–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banno K, Ishikawa H, Hamauzu Y, and Tabira H (1999) Identification of a RAPD marker linked to the susceptible gene of black spot disease in Japanese pear. J Japan Soc Hortic Sci 68: 476–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao L, Chen K, Zhang D, Cao Y, Yamamoto T, and Teng T (2007) Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54: 959–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell RL (1990) Pears (Pyrus). In: Moore JN, Ballington JR Jr. (eds), Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops I. International Society for Horticultural Science, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp655–697Google Scholar
  5. Bell RL, Quamme HA, Layne REC, and Skirvin RM (1996) Pears. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds), Fruit breeding, volume I: tree and tropical fruits. John Wiley and Sons Inc, UK, pp441–514Google Scholar
  6. Bell RL, Scorza R, Srinivasan C, and Webb K (1999) Transformation of “Beurre Bosc” pear with the rolC gene., J Amer Soc Hortic Sci 124: 570–574Google Scholar
  7. Bellini E (1995) Pear breeding and genetics (Pyrus communis L.). In Bellini E (ed), State of the art and perspectives of world genetic improvement of fruit tree species (peach, plum, apricot and pear), Societa Orticola Italiana, Firenze, pp99–157Google Scholar
  8. Bellini E, and Nin S (2002) Breeding for new traits in pear. Acta Hort 596: 217–224Google Scholar
  9. Bouvier L, Zhang YZ, and Lespinasse Y (1993) Two methods of haploidization in pear, Pyrus communis L., greenhouse seedling selection and in situ parthenogenesis induced by irradiated pollen. Theor Appl Genet 87: 229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chevreau E, and Bell R (2005) Pyrus spp. pear and Cydonia spp. Quince. In Litz RE (ed), Biotechnology of Fruit and Nut Crops, C.A.B. International, Wallingford, UK, pp543–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chevreau E, Decourtye L, and Skirvin RM (1989) A review of pear chimeras: their identification and separation into pure types. HortSci 24: 32–34Google Scholar
  12. Djennane S, Cesbron C, Sourice S, Loridon K, and Chevreau E (2007) Marker-free transgenic pear production by inducible expression of R-recombinase. ISHS International Symposium on Genetic transformations – challenges and possibilities for horticulture of the world. 16–20 September 2007, Ski, Norvège. (poster)Google Scholar
  13. Dolatowski J, Nowosielski J, Podyma W, Szymanska M, and Zych M (2004) Molecular studies on the variability of Polish semi-wild pears (Pyrus) using AFLP. J Fruit Orna Plant Res 12: 331–337Google Scholar
  14. Dondini L, Pierantoni L, Gaiotti F, Chiodini R, Tartarini S, Bazzi C, and Sansavini S (2004) Identifying QTLs for fire-blight resistance via a European pear (Pyrus communis L.) genetic linkage map. Mol Breed 14: 407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downie SR, and Palmer JD (1992) Use of chloroplast rearrangements in reconstructing plant phylogeny. In: Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp14–35Google Scholar
  16. Evans RC, and Campbell CS (2002) The origin of the apple subfamily (Maloideae; Rosaceae) is clarified by DNA sequence data from duplicated GBSSI genes. Am J Bot 89: 1478–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez-Fernandez F, Harvey NG, and James CM (2006) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers from European pear (Pyrus communis L.). Mol Ecol Notes 6: 1039–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flaishman MA, Shlizerman L, Cohen Y, Kerem Z, and Sivan L (2005) Expression of the health-beneficial stilbenes in transgenic ‘Spadona’ pear (Pyrus communis L.). Acta Hortic 671: 283–288Google Scholar
  19. Flaishman M, Cohen Y, Freeman A, Golubowicz S, Korchinsky R, and Yablowicz Z (2007) Development of a fast and compact breeding system in pear by the use of juvenile free transgenic plants. EUCARPIA XII Fruit section Symposium, September 16–20, 2007, Zaragoza, Spain, Abstract book, p200Google Scholar
  20. Gao M, Matsuta N, Murayama N, Toyomasu T, Mitsuhashi W, Dandekar A, Tao R, and Nishimura K (2007) Gene expression and ethylene production in transgenic pear (Pyrus communis cv. ‘La France’) with sense or antisense cDNA encoding ACC oxidase. Plant Sci 173: 32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hedrick UP, Howe GH, Taylor OM, Francis EH, and Tukey HB (1921) The pears of new York. New York Dept. Agric. 29th Annu. Rep. Vol2, part2Google Scholar
  22. Hemmat M, Weeden NF, and Brown SK (2003) Mapping and evaluation of Malus × domestica microsatellites in apple and pear. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 128: 515–520Google Scholar
  23. Iketani H, Manabe T, Matsuta N, Akihama T, and Hayashi T (1998) Incongruence between RFLPs of chloroplast DNA and morphological classification in east Asian pear (Pyrus spp.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 45: 533–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iketani H, Abe K, Yamamoto T, Kotobuki K, Sato Y, Saito T, Terai O, Matsuta N, and Hayashi T (2001) Mapping of disease-related genes in Japanese pear using a molecular linkage map with RAPD markers. Breed Sci 51: 179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Inoue E, Kasumi M, Sakuma F, Anzai H, Amano K, and Hara H (2006) Identification of RAPD marker linked to fruit skin color in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Sci Hortic 107: 254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inoue E, Matsuki Y, Anzai H, and Evans K (2007) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Mol Ecol Notes 7: 445–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ishii H, Udagawa H, Nishimoto S, Tsuda T, and Nakashima H (1992) Scab resistance in pear species and cultivars. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 27: 293–298Google Scholar
  28. Ishii H, Watanabe H, and Tanabe K (2002) Venturia nashicola: Pathological specialization on pears and control trial with resistance inducers. Acta Hort 587: 613–621Google Scholar
  29. Ishimizu T, Shinkawa T, Sakiyama F, and Norioka S (1998) Primary structural features of rosaceous S-RNase associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility. Plant Mol Biol 37: 931–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ishimizu T, Inoue K, Shimonaka M, Saito T, Terai O, and Norioka S (1999) PCR-based method for identifying the S-genotypes of Japanese pear cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98: 961–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Itai A, Kawata T, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Uchiyama M, Tomomitsu M, and Shiraiwa N (1999) Identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase genes controlling the ethylene level of ripening fruit in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Mol Gen Genet 261: 42–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Itai A, Tanabe K, Tamura F, and Tomomitsu M (2003a) Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) synthase (PPACS3) from ripening fruit of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). J Japan Soc Hort Sci 72: 99–106Google Scholar
  33. Itai A, Kotaki T, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Kawaguchi D, and Fukuda M (2003b) Rapid identification of ACC synthase genotypes in cultivars of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) using CAPS markers. Theor Appl Genet 106: 1266–1272Google Scholar
  34. Katayama H, and Uematsu C (2003) Comparative analysis of chloroplast DNA in Pyrus species: physical map and gene localization. Theor Appl Genet 106: 303–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kikuchi A (1946) Speciation and taxonomy of Chinese pears. Collected Records of Hort. Res. 3, 1–8. Kyoto Univ. (Trans. by K. Park; ed. by M. N. Westwood)Google Scholar
  36. Kim CS, Lee GP, Han DH, Ryu KH, and Lee CH (2000a) Classification and identification of Pyrus pyrifolia using RAPD. J Kor Soc Hortic Sci 41: 119–124Google Scholar
  37. Kim CS, Lee GP, Han DH, Ryu KH, and Lee CH (2000b) SCARs markers derived from RAPD for cultivar identification in Pyrus pyrifolia. J Kor Soc Hortic Sci 41: 125–128Google Scholar
  38. Kim D, and Ko KC (2004) Identification markers and phylogenetic analysis using RAPD in Asian pears (Pyrus spp.). J Kor Soc Hortic Sci 45: 194–200Google Scholar
  39. Kimura T, Shi Y, Shoda M, Kotobuki K, Matsuta N, Hayashi T, Ban Y, and Yamamoto T (2002) Identification of Asian pear varieties by SSR analysis. Breed Sci 52: 115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kimura T, Iketani H, Kotobuki K, Matsuta N, Ban Y, Hayashi T, and Yamamoto T (2003) Genetic characterization of pear varieties revealed by chloroplast DNA sequences. J Horti Sci Biotech 78: 241–247Google Scholar
  41. Kozaki I. (1973) Black spot disease resistance in Japanese pear. I. Heredity of the disease resistance. Bull Hort Res Stn A12: 17–27. (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  42. Lebedev VG, Taran SA, and Dolgov SV (2002a) Pear transformation by gene of supersweet protein Thaumatin II for fruit taste modification. Acta Hort 596: 199–202Google Scholar
  43. Lebedev VG, Lavrova N, Lunin VG, and Dolgov SV (2002b) Plant-Defensin genes introduction for improvement of pear phytopathogen resistance. Acta Hort 596: 167–172Google Scholar
  44. Lee GP, Lee CH, and Kim CS (2004). Molecular markers derived from RAPD, SCAR, and the conserved 18S rDNA sequences for classification and identification in Pyrus pyrifolia and P. communis. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1487–1491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Liebhard R, Gianfranceschi L, Koller B, Ryder CD, Tarchini R, Van De Weg E, and Gessler C (2002) Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Mol Breed 10: 217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liebhard R, Koller B, Gianfranceschi L, and Gessler C (2003) Creating a saturated reference map for the apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) genome. Theor Appl Genet 106: 1497–1508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Maliepaard C, Alston FH, van Arkel G, Brown LM, Chevreau E, Dunemann F, Evans KM, Gardiner S, Guilford P, van Heusden AW, Janse J, Laurens F, Lynn JR, Manganaris AG, den Nijs APM, Periam N, Rikkerink E, Roche P, Ryder C, Sansavini S, Schmidt H, Tartarini S, Verhaegh JJ, Vrielink-van Ginkel M, and J. King G (1998) Aligning male and female linkage maps of apple (Malus pumila Mill.) using multi-allelic markers. Theor Appl Genet 97: 60–73Google Scholar
  48. Malnoy M, Reynoird JP, and Chevreau E (2000) Preliminary evaluation of new gene transfer strategies for resistance to fire blight in pear. Acta Hort 538: 635–638Google Scholar
  49. Malnoy M, Venisse JS, Brisset MN, and Chevreau E (2003a) Expression of bovine lactoferrin cDNA confers resistance to Erwinia amylovora in transgenic pear. Mol Breed 12: 231–244Google Scholar
  50. Malnoy M, Venisse JS, Reynoird JP, and Chevreau E (2003b) Activation of three pathogen-inducible promoters of tobacco in transgenic pears (Pyrus communis L.) after biotic and abiotic elicitation. Planta 216: 802–814Google Scholar
  51. Malnoy M, Faize M, Venissse JS, Geider K, and Chevreau E (2005a) Expression of viral EPS-depolymerase reduces fire blight susceptibility in transgenic pear. Plant Cell Rep 23: 632–638Google Scholar
  52. Malnoy M, Venisse JS, and Chevreau E (2005b) Expression of a bacterial effector, Harpin N, causes increased resistance to fire blight in Pyrus communis. Tree Genet Genomes 1: 41–49Google Scholar
  53. Matsuda N, Ikeda K, Kurosaka M, Isuzugawa K, Endo T, Omura M, and Takashina T (2006) In vitro flowering of transgenic pears (Pyrus communis L.) expressing CiFT, a Citrus ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene. 3rd International Rosaceae Genomics Conference, Napier, New Zealand (poster)Google Scholar
  54. Monte-Corvo L, Cabrita L, Oliveira C, and Leitao J (2000) Assessment of genetic relationships among Pyrus species and cultivars using AFLP and RAPD markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 47: 257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Monte-Corvo L, Goulao L, and Oliveira C (2001) ISSR analysis of cultivars of pear and suitability of molecular markers for clone discrimination. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126: 517–522Google Scholar
  56. Morgan DR, Soltis DE, and Robertson KR (1994) Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Am J Bot 81: 890–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mourgues F, Chevreau E, Lambert C, and De Bondt A (1996) Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and recovery of transgenic plants from pear (Pyrus communis L.). Plant Cell Rep 16: 245–249Google Scholar
  58. Nakashima T, Ueno T, Fukami H, Taga T, Masuda H, Osaki K, Otani H, Kohmoto K, and Nishimura S (1985) Isolation and structures of AK-toxin I and II, host-specific phytotoxic metabolites produced by Alternaria alternata Japanese pear pathotype. Agri Biol Chem 49: 807–815Google Scholar
  59. Ochatt SJ, and Caso OH (1986) Shoot regeneration from leaf mesophyll protoplasts of wild pear (Pyrus communis var. Pyraster L.). J Plant Physiol 122: 243–249Google Scholar
  60. Ochatt SJ, Patat-Ochatt EM, Rech EL, Davey MR, and Power JB (1989) Somatic hybridization of sexually incompatible top-fruit tree rootstocks, wild pear (Pyrus communis var. pyraster L.) and Colt cherry (Prunus avium X pseudocerasus). Theor Appl Genet 78: 35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oliveira CM, Mota M, Monte-Corvo L, Goulao L, and Silva DL (1999) Molecular typing of Pyrus based on RAPD markers. Sci Hortic 79: 163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Palmer JD, Jorgensen RA, and Thompson WF (1985) Chloroplast DNA variation and evolution in Pisum; patterns of change and phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 109: 195–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Patocchi A, Walser M, Tartarini S, Broggini GA, Gennari F, Sansavini S, and Gessler C (2005) Identification by genome scanning approach (GSA) of a microsatellite tightly associated with the apple scab resistance gene Vm. Genome 48: 630–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Pierantoni L, Cho KH, Shin IS, Chiodini R, Tartarini S, Dondini L, Kang SJ, and Sansavini S (2004) Characterisation and transferability of apple SSRs to two European pear F1 populations. Theor Appl Genet 109: 1519–1524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Predieri S, and Zimmerman RH (2001) Pear mutagenesis, In vitro treatments with gamma-rays and field selection for productivity and fruit traits. Euphytica 117: 217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reynoird JP, Mourgues F, Norelli J, Aldwinckle HS, Brisset MN, and Chevreau E (1999) First evidence for improved resistance to fire blight in transgenic pear expressing the attacin E gene from Hyalophora cecropia. Plant Sci 149: 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rubzov GA (1944) Geographical distribution of the genus Pyrus and trends and factors in its evolution. Am Naturalist 78: 358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sanzol J, and Herrero M (2002) Identification of self-incompatibility alleles in pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.). Euphytica 128: 325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sassa H, Hirano H, Nishio T, and Koba T (1997) Style-specific self-compatible mutation caused by deletion of the S-RNase gene in Japanese pear (Pyrus serotina). Plant J 12: 223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sassa H, Kakui H, Miyamoto M, Suzuki Y, Hanada T, Ushijima K, Kusaba M, Hirano H, and Koba T (2007) S locus F-box brothers: Multiple and pollen-specific F-box genes with S haplotype-specific polymorphisms in apple and Japanese pear. Genetics 175: 1869–1881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Sawamura Y, Saito T, Takada N, Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Hayashi T, and Kotobuki K (2004) Identification of parentage of Japanese pear ‘Housui’. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 73: 511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schmidt H, and van de Weg WE (2005) Breeding, In Tromp J, Webster AD, and Wertheim SJ (eds), Fundamentals of Temperate Zone Tree Fruit Production, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp136–155Google Scholar
  73. Takasaki T, Okada K, Castillo C, Moriya Y, Saito T, Sawamura Y, Norioka N, Norioka S, and Nakanishi T (2004) Sequence of the S9-RNase cDNA and PCR-RFLP for discriminating S1- to S9-alleles in Japanese pear. Euphytica 135: 157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tang SH, Sun M, Lia ZH, Zhou QG, and Li DG (2007) Production of transgenic Xueqing pear plants with a synthetic Cry1Ac gene mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Acta Hortic Sinica 34: 56–62Google Scholar
  75. Teng Y, Tanabe K, Tamura F, and Itai A (2001) Genetic relationships of pear cultivars in Xinjiang, China as measured by RAPD markers. J Hortic Sci Biotech 76: 771–779Google Scholar
  76. Teng Y, Tanabe K, Tamura F, and Itai A (2002) Genetic relationships of Pyrus species and cultivars native to East Asia revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127: 262–270Google Scholar
  77. Terakami S, Shoda M, Adachi Y, Gonai T, Kasumi M, Sawamura Y, Iketani H, Kotobuki K, Patocchi A, Gessler C, Hayashi T, and Yamamoto T (2006) Genetic mapping of the pear scab resistance gene Vnk of Japanese pear cultivar Kinchaku. Theor Appl Genet 113: 743–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Terakami S, Adachi Y, Iketani H, Sato Y, Sawamura Y, Takada N, Nishitani C, and Yamamoto T (2007) Genetic mapping of genes for susceptibility to black spot disease in Japanese pears. Genome 50: 735–741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Ushijima K, Sassa H, Tao R, Yamane H, Dandekar AM, Gradziel TM, and Hirano H (1998) Cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding S-RNases from almond (Prunus dulcis): primary structural features and sequence diversity of the S-RNases in Rosaceae. Mol Gen Genet 260: 261–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Volk GM, Richards CM, Henk AD, Reilley AA, Bassil NV, and Postman JD (2006) Diversity of wild Pyrus communis based on microsatellite analyses. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131: 408–417Google Scholar
  81. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, and Kuiper M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407–4414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Weber JL, and May PE (1989) Abundant class of human DNA polymorphism which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Hum Genet 44: 388–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Wen XP, Pang XM, Matsuda N, Kita M, Inoue H, Hao YJ, Honda C, and Moriguchi T (2008) Over-expression of the apple spermidine synthase gene in pear confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance by altering polyamine titers. Transgenic Res 17: 251–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wertheim SJ (2002) Rootstocks for European pear : a review. Acta Hort 596: 299–307Google Scholar
  85. Westwood MN, and Bjornstad HO (1971) Some fruit characteristics of interspecific hybrids and extent of self-sterility in Pyrus. Bull Torrey Bot Club 98: 22–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Shoda M, Ban Y, Hayashi T, and Matsuta N (2002a) Development of microsatellite markers in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Mol Ecol Notes 2: 14–16Google Scholar
  87. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T, Ban Y, and Matsuta N (2002b) Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124: 129–137Google Scholar
  88. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Shoda M, Imai T, Saito T, Sawamura Y, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T, and Matsuta N (2002c) Genetic linkage maps constructed by using an interspecific cross between Japanese and European pears. Theor Appl Genet 106: 9–18Google Scholar
  89. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Saito T, Kotobuki K, Matsuta N, Liebhard R, Gessler C, van de Weg WE, and Hayashi T (2004) Genetic linkage maps of Japanese and European pears aligned to the apple consensus map. Acta Hort 663: 51–56Google Scholar
  90. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Terakami S, Nishitani C, Sawamura Y, Saito T, Kotobuki K, and Hayashi T (2007) Integrated reference genetic linkage maps of pear based on SSRs and AFLPs. Breed Sci 57: 321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yoshioka T, Masuda T, Kotobuki K, Sanada T, and Ito Y (1998) Gamma-ray-induced mutation breeding in fruit trees: breeding of mutant cultivars resistant to black spot disease in Japanese pear. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly – Tsukuba Ibaraki 33: 227–234Google Scholar
  92. Zeven AC, Zhukovsky M (1975) Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  93. Zhao RH, Liu QZ, Sung QR, and Zhang XS (2004) Obtaining transgenic Fertility pear (Pyrus communis L.) plants with antifungal gamma-thionin Rs-afp1 gene. J Agric Biotech 12: 729–730Google Scholar
  94. Zhu LH, Ahlman A, and Welander M (2003) The rooting ability of the dwarfing rootstock BP10030 (Pyrus communis) was significantly increased by introduction of the rolB gene. Plant Sci 135: 829–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zisovich AH, Stern RA, Shafir S, and Goldway M (2004) Identification of seven S-alleles form the European pear (Pyrus communis) and the determination of compatibility among cultivars. J Hort Sci Biotech 79: 101–106Google Scholar
  96. Zuccherelli S, Tassinari P, Broothaerts W, Tartarini S, Dondini L, and Sansavini S (2002) S-allele characterization in self incompatible pear (Pyrus communis L.). Sex Plant Reprod 15: 153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiya Yamamoto
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Chevreau
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of Fruit Tree ScienceTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.UMR- 1259 (GenHort), INRA-INH-Université d’Angers, INRAFrance

Personalised recommendations