Advertisement

Product-Process Ontology for Managing Assembly Specific Knowledge Between Product Design and Assembly System Simulation

  • Minna Lanz
  • Fernando Garcia
  • Timo Kallela
  • Reijo Tuokko
Part of the IFIP — International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 260)

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to introduce a feature-based Product-Process-System model and ontology in order to retrieve and share knowledge for simulation of manufacturing systems. Product knowledge is the combination of product specific information, such as functionality, colour and product variants, and the corresponding product model. The model provides understanding of the product structure, rules, constraints and assembly-specific information in relation to the product model. In the design and modeling of assembly processes, features form the foundation for analysis and knowledge acquisition of the product. This knowledge includes geometric and non-geometric information. In the present paper, an approach is proposed to share platform independent product-process knowledge between the assembly process and system design and even with the simulation environment.

Keywords

product-process ontology knowledge management feature-based modeling and analysis 

References

  1. [1]
    H. Bley, C. Franke, Integration of Product Design and Assembly Planning in the Digital Factory, Institute for Production Engineering/CAM Saarland University, Germany, 2004 p. 6Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Deneux, “Introduction to assembly features: an illustrated synthesis methodology”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1999/10, pp. 29–39Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Feldman, H. Rottbauer, N. Roth, “Relevance of Assembly in Global Manufacturing”, Annals of the CIRP, vol. 45/2/1996 pp. 545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    W.E., Grosso, J.H., Gennari, R.W., Fergerson, M.A., Musen When Knowledge Models Collide (How it Happens and What to Do), Technical Report, Stanford Medical Informatics, Stanford University Stanford, 1998Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    W. van Holland, Assembly Features in Modelling and Planning, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1997 p. 160Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Järvenpää, Enhancement of Process Planning and Simulation of Final Assembly for Aerospace Industry, M.Sc thesis, Institute of Production Eng., Tampere University of Technology 2007, p. 104Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Laakko, Incremental Feature Modeling: Methodology for Integrating Features and Solid Models, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, 1993 p.85Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Lanz, An Approach to Feature-based Modelling and Analysis for the Final Assembly, M.Sc. Thesis, Institute of Production Eng., Tampere University of Technology, 2005, p. 100Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    E. Lim, V. Cherkassky, “Semantic Networks and Associative Databases — Two Approaches to Knowledge Representation and Reasoning”, IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, volume 7, issue 4, August 1992Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Tallinen, R. Velez Osuna, J. L. Martinez Lastra, R. Tuokko, “Product Model Representation Concept for the Purpose of Assembly Process Modeling”, in Proceeding of the International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning ISATP 2003, Besançon, France, July 2003, p.6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minna Lanz
    • 1
  • Fernando Garcia
    • 1
  • Timo Kallela
    • 1
  • Reijo Tuokko
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Production Engineering (IPE)Tampere University of Technology (TUT)TampereFinland

Personalised recommendations