Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developments in the Design of Instruction

From Simple Models to Complex Electronic Learning Environments

  • Chapter
Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction

This chapter addresses the relationship between the psychology of cognition and learning and the design of instruction in its development during the last half of the former century and the following years in this century. The findings of research on cognition and learning and the applications for the design of instruction become integrated with the developments in information and communication technologies. The chapter shows both the development of the generic ADDIE model and the design of highly specific situated simulation and games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achtenhagen, F. (2004). Curriculum development as modeling of complex reality. In N. M. Seel & Dijkstra, S. (Eds.). Curriculum, plans and Processes in Instructional Design. (pp. 193- 210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, S., & Duguid, D. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. P. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of ver- bal learning and verbal behavior, 8, 240-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). A cognitive theory of inquiry teaching. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status. (pp. 247- 278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, L., & Dumbleton, T. (2001). Computer Games in Education Project. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. Electronically available at: http://www.becta.org.uk/ page_documents/research/cge/report.pdf

  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. M. (1978). The systematic design of instruction. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, S. (1997). The integration of instructional systems design models and constructivistic design principles. Instructional Science, 25, 1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, S. (2000). Epistemology, Psychology of Learning and Instructional Design. In M. Spector & T. Anderson (Eds). Holistic and Integrative Perspectives on Learning, Instructional Design and Technology. Understanding complexity. (pp. 213-232). Dordrecht: Kluwea Aca- demic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, S. (2004a). Theoretical foundations of learning and instruction and innovations of in- structional design and technology. In  N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds). Curriculum,plans and processes in instructional design. (pp. 17-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, S. (2004b). The integration of curriculum design, instructional design and media choice. In N. M. Seel & Dijkstra, S. (Eds.). Curriculum, plans and Processes in Instructional Design. (pp. 131 - 144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of  learning (1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. (1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Mayor, J. R., Garstens, H. L., & Paradise, N. E. (1962). Factors in acquiring knowledge of a mathematical task. Psychological Monographs, 76, 7 (Whole No. 526).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garris, R., Ahlers R., Driskell J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and prac- tice model. Simulation & Gaming: An international Journal, 33, 441-467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1964). Components of the instructional process. In J. P. deCecco (Ed.). Educational technology. (pp. 68-76). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaserfeld, E. von (1996). Radical constructivism. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training Magazine, 37(4), 42.53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen, K., & Sormunen, E. (2000). Learning information retrieval through an educational game. Education for Information 18, 289-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, D. (1995). Games, simulations and case studies - a review. In: D. Saunders (Ed.), The simulation and gaming yearbook. Games and simulations for business (Vol. 3.). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansz, J., & Martens, L. (2005). Gaming at a LAN event: the social context of playing games. New media & society, 7, 3, 333-355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Objectivism versus Constructivism: Do We Need a New Philosophical Paradigm. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 39, 5 - 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong, T. de, & Joolingen, W. R van (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simula- tions of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature Review in Games and Learning. Nesta future- lab series. Report 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experi- ential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klawe, M. M., & Phillips, E. (1995). A classroom study: Electronic games engage children as re- searchers. Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning ’95 (CSCL), Bloom- ington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemkuil, H., de Jong, T., de Hoog, R., & Christoph, N. (2003). KM Quest: a collaborative internet-based simulation game. Simulation & Gaming: An international Journal, 34, 1, 89-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemkuil, H. (2006). Is it all in the game? Learner support in an educational knowledge man- agement simulation game. Enschede: University of Twente, Faculty of behavioural sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutner, D. (1993). Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3, 113-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? Ameri- can Psychologist, 59, 14-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, A. W. (1964). Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status. (pp. 279-334) Hillsdale, NJ: Law- rence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriënboer, J.J.G. van. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instruc- tional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42, 5, 34 - 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1983).  Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.). Mental models. ( pp. 7- 14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, R. S., Gray, W., & Reynolds, T. (2006). Virtual reality and simulators: implications for web-based education and training. In H. F. O’Neill and R. S. Perez (Eds.) Web-based learn- ing. Theory, research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, V. A. M., & Vissers, G. A. N., (2004). A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simulation & Gaming: An international Journal, 35, 1, 70-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1937). La construction du réel chez l’enfant. [The child s construction of the reality.] Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). The elaboration theory of  instruction. In Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status. (pp. 335-382). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M. (2004). Model-centered learning environments: theory, instructional design and ef- fects. In In N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds). Curriculum, plans and processes in instructional design. (pp. 49-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M., & Dijkstra, S. (2004a). Introduction: instructional design and curriculum develop- ment. In N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds). Curriculum, plans and processes in instructional de- sign. (pp. 1-17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M., & Dijkstra, S. (2004b). Delivery systems, information and communication technol- ogy, and media in education. In N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds). Curriculum, plans and proc- esses in instructional design. (pp. 257-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N.M., Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P.N. (2007, in press). Mental models and problem solving: Technological solutions for measurement and assessment of the development of ex- pertise. In P. Blumschein, D. Jonassen, D. Hung, D., & J. Strobel (Eds.), Learning by model- ling systems. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M., & Winn, W. D. (1997). Research on media and learning: distributed cognition and semiotics. In Tennyson, R. D., Schott, F., Seel, N., & Dijkstra, S. (Eds), Instructional design: international perspectives (Vol. 1). 293-326. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Re- view, 24 (2), 86-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969-977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., Graf, M., Renkl, A., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1995). Förderung von Handlungskompe- tenz durch geleitetes Problemlösen und multiple Lernkontexte (Fostering action competence through guided problem-solving and multiple learning contexts). Zeitschrift für Entwick- lungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 27, 289-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38(1), 31-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Twente, Netherlands

    Sanne Dijkstra & Henny Leemkuil

Authors
  1. Sanne Dijkstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henny Leemkuil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Albert-Ludwigs University, 79085, Freiburg, Germany

    Dirk Ifenthaler  & Pablo Pirnay-Dummer  & 

  2. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    J. Michael Spector

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dijkstra, S., Leemkuil, H. (2008). Developments in the Design of Instruction. In: Ifenthaler, D., Pirnay-Dummer, P., Spector, J.M. (eds) Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76898-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation