Skip to main content

Semi-Parametric Tools for Spatial Hedonic Models: An Introduction to Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression and Geoadditive Models

  • Chapter
Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets

This chapter focuses on the contribution of semi-parametric tools such as Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) (Fotheringham et al. 1997) and Geoadditive Models (Hastie and Tibshirani 1993; Kammann and Wand 2003) that belong to the General Additive Models family (GAM), to explore the effects of distance regressors on price and/or spatial nonstationarity of implicit house price coefficient in hedonic functions. These tools have become essential with:

  • Growing evidence in the economic literature of the multiplicity of amenity sources linked to space and location of houses. Amenity sources can be related to the distance to different public services, commercial facilities, noteworthy landmarks, tourist area, etc. Using monocentric models based on the single distance to Central Business District (CBD) is not sufficient to assess the effect of urban sprawl on land prices. Dominant models in economy fail to account for amenity values, congestion cost or social expenditure for public infrastructure (Brueckner 2001). The specification of hedonic OLS models may be quite difficult when numerous distance measures are candidate regressors, especially with respect to the colinearity issue. GAM is a powerful and flexible tool to explore distance effects with large samples.

  • The upscale and downscale extension of available spatial descriptors provided by many public and private organizations has resulted in an explosion in the use of GIS in the last five years. This increased use of GIS by public administrations facilitates the introduction of finer descriptors of landscape, public services and social neighbourhoods in hedonic models. Working on large samples with a lot of finer descriptors of the environment and neighborhood involves dealing with numerous local effects. In this case it is necessary to use multiple scales to analyze the structure of house prices (Quigley 1995). Locally weighted regressions such as Geographically Weighted Regressions (GWR) or MGWR, and GAM, enable estimation of spatially varying and invariant implicit prices in hedonic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (2001) Spatial effects in econometric practice in environmental and resource economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 705- 710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Bera AK, Florax R, Yoon MJ (1996) Simple diagnostic test for spatial dependance. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26: 77-104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini A, Bowman A (1997) Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis. Oxford University Press, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Yu D (2006) Geographically weighted regression. R package version 0.3-12, http://ncg.nuim.ie/ncg/GWR/index.htm

  • Bowman A (1984) An alternative method of cross-validation for the smoothing of density estimate. Biometrika 71: 353-360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK (2001) Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. In: Gale WG, Rothenberg J (eds) Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs. Brookings Institution Press, pp 65-89

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton M (1996) Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis 28: 281-298

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton M (1998) Spatial nonstationarity and autoregressive models. Environment and Planning A 30: 957-993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland W (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatter-plots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 829-836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craven P, Wahba G (1979) Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numerische Mathematik 31: 377-403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Des Rosiers F, ThiĂ©rault M (1996) Houses prices, neighborhood factors and spatial dynamics: improving hedonic modeling using trend surface analysis. Working Paper, FacultĂ© des sciences de l’Administration, Laval University, QuĂ©bec, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Charlton M, Brunsdon C (1997) Two techniques for exploring nonstationarity in geographical data. Geographical Systems 4: 59-82

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (1999) Some notes on parametric signiÂżcance tests for geographically weigthed regression. Journal of Regional Science 39: 497-524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geniaux G, NapolĂ©one C (2005) Rente foncière et anticipations dans le pĂ©riurbain. Economie et PrĂ©vision 68: 77-92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R (1993) Varying-coefÂżcient models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B55: 757-796

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoaglin D, Welsch RE (1978) The hat matrix in regression and anova. The American Statistician 32: 17-22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammann EE, Wand MP (2003) Geoadditive models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C52: 1-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M, Stuart A (1977) The advanced theory of statistics. GrifÂżn, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YJ, Gu C (2004) Smoothing spline gaussian regression: more scalable computation via efÂżcient approximation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B66: 337-356

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung Y, Mei C, Zhang W (2000a) Statistical tests for spatial nonstationarity based on the geographically weighted regression model. Environment And Planning A32: 9-32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung Y, Mei C, Zhang W (2000b) Testing for spatial autocorrelation among the residuals of the geographically weighted regression. Environment And Planning A32: 871-890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei C (2006) Geographically weighted regression technique for spatial data analysis. Working Paper of School Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei C, He S, Fang K (2004) A note on the mixed geographically weighted regression model. Journal of Regional Science 44: 143-157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paez A (2002) Spatial parametric non-stationarity: a variance heterogeneity approach. Working Paper, Centre for Spatial Analysis, School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University

    Google Scholar 

  • Paez A, Uchida T, Miyamoto K (2001) Spatial association and heterogeneity issues in land price models. Urban Studies 38: 1493-1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A, Lubowski R, Stavins R (2002) The effects of potential land development on agricultural land prices. Journal of Urban Economics 52: 561-581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley JM (1995) A simple hybrid model for estimating real estate price indexes. Journal of Housing Economics 4: 1-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speckman P (1988) Kernel smoothing in partial linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B50: 413-436

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood S (2004) Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 673-686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S (2006) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman and Hall, CRC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geniaux, G., Napoléone, C. (2008). Semi-Parametric Tools for Spatial Hedonic Models: An Introduction to Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression and Geoadditive Models. In: Baranzini, A., Ramirez, J., Schaerer, C., Thalmann, P. (eds) Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76815-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics