This chapter focuses on the contribution of semi-parametric tools such as Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) (Fotheringham et al. 1997) and Geoadditive Models (Hastie and Tibshirani 1993; Kammann and Wand 2003) that belong to the General Additive Models family (GAM), to explore the effects of distance regressors on price and/or spatial nonstationarity of implicit house price coefficient in hedonic functions. These tools have become essential with:
-
Growing evidence in the economic literature of the multiplicity of amenity sources linked to space and location of houses. Amenity sources can be related to the distance to different public services, commercial facilities, noteworthy landmarks, tourist area, etc. Using monocentric models based on the single distance to Central Business District (CBD) is not sufficient to assess the effect of urban sprawl on land prices. Dominant models in economy fail to account for amenity values, congestion cost or social expenditure for public infrastructure (Brueckner 2001). The specification of hedonic OLS models may be quite difficult when numerous distance measures are candidate regressors, especially with respect to the colinearity issue. GAM is a powerful and flexible tool to explore distance effects with large samples.
-
The upscale and downscale extension of available spatial descriptors provided by many public and private organizations has resulted in an explosion in the use of GIS in the last five years. This increased use of GIS by public administrations facilitates the introduction of finer descriptors of landscape, public services and social neighbourhoods in hedonic models. Working on large samples with a lot of finer descriptors of the environment and neighborhood involves dealing with numerous local effects. In this case it is necessary to use multiple scales to analyze the structure of house prices (Quigley 1995). Locally weighted regressions such as Geographically Weighted Regressions (GWR) or MGWR, and GAM, enable estimation of spatially varying and invariant implicit prices in hedonic analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anselin L (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Anselin L (2001) Spatial effects in econometric practice in environmental and resource economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 705- 710
Anselin L, Bera AK, Florax R, Yoon MJ (1996) Simple diagnostic test for spatial dependance. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26: 77-104
Azzalini A, Bowman A (1997) Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis. Oxford University Press, NewYork
Bivand R, Yu D (2006) Geographically weighted regression. R package version 0.3-12, http://ncg.nuim.ie/ncg/GWR/index.htm
Bowman A (1984) An alternative method of cross-validation for the smoothing of density estimate. Biometrika 71: 353-360
Brueckner JK (2001) Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. In: Gale WG, Rothenberg J (eds) Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs. Brookings Institution Press, pp 65-89
Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton M (1996) Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis 28: 281-298
Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton M (1998) Spatial nonstationarity and autoregressive models. Environment and Planning A 30: 957-993
Cleveland W (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatter-plots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 829-836
Craven P, Wahba G (1979) Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numerische Mathematik 31: 377-403
Des Rosiers F, Thiérault M (1996) Houses prices, neighborhood factors and spatial dynamics: improving hedonic modeling using trend surface analysis. Working Paper, Faculté des sciences de l’Administration, Laval University, Québec, CA
Fotheringham AS, Charlton M, Brunsdon C (1997) Two techniques for exploring nonstationarity in geographical data. Geographical Systems 4: 59-82
Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (1999) Some notes on parametric signiÂżcance tests for geographically weigthed regression. Journal of Regional Science 39: 497-524
Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Geniaux G, Napoléone C (2005) Rente foncière et anticipations dans le périurbain. Economie et Prévision 68: 77-92
Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, London
Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R (1993) Varying-coefÂżcient models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B55: 757-796
Hoaglin D, Welsch RE (1978) The hat matrix in regression and anova. The American Statistician 32: 17-22
Kammann EE, Wand MP (2003) Geoadditive models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C52: 1-18
Kendall M, Stuart A (1977) The advanced theory of statistics. GrifÂżn, London
Kim YJ, Gu C (2004) Smoothing spline gaussian regression: more scalable computation via efÂżcient approximation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B66: 337-356
Leung Y, Mei C, Zhang W (2000a) Statistical tests for spatial nonstationarity based on the geographically weighted regression model. Environment And Planning A32: 9-32
Leung Y, Mei C, Zhang W (2000b) Testing for spatial autocorrelation among the residuals of the geographically weighted regression. Environment And Planning A32: 871-890
Mei C (2006) Geographically weighted regression technique for spatial data analysis. Working Paper of School Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University
Mei C, He S, Fang K (2004) A note on the mixed geographically weighted regression model. Journal of Regional Science 44: 143-157
Paez A (2002) Spatial parametric non-stationarity: a variance heterogeneity approach. Working Paper, Centre for Spatial Analysis, School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University
Paez A, Uchida T, Miyamoto K (2001) Spatial association and heterogeneity issues in land price models. Urban Studies 38: 1493-1508
Plantinga A, Lubowski R, Stavins R (2002) The effects of potential land development on agricultural land prices. Journal of Urban Economics 52: 561-581
Quigley JM (1995) A simple hybrid model for estimating real estate price indexes. Journal of Housing Economics 4: 1-12
Speckman P (1988) Kernel smoothing in partial linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B50: 413-436
Wood S (2004) Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 673-686
Wood S (2006) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman and Hall, CRC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geniaux, G., Napoléone, C. (2008). Semi-Parametric Tools for Spatial Hedonic Models: An Introduction to Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression and Geoadditive Models. In: Baranzini, A., Ramirez, J., Schaerer, C., Thalmann, P. (eds) Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76815-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76815-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76814-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76815-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)