The leg is commonly imaged as an extension of an examination from the adjacent joints when symptoms or pathology extend proximally or distally. The leg, which extends between the knee and ankle joints, is highly suited to ultrasound evaluation given the superficial nature of its structures. Ultrasound has the advantage over other imaging modalities in that it can localize the site of symptoms and then trace the pathology proximally or distally in real time as required. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for example, may require changing the imaging field of view and coils. In addition, ultrasound will allow a dynamic assessment, e.g., in the evaluation of an intermittent muscle hernia or tendon subluxation. Ultrasound, however, can be limited as resolution decreases with depth, whereas MRI will provide excellent imaging of deeper structures, e.g., the deep posterior compartment. Although ultrasound and MRI are often viewed as competing imaging modalities, they are more often complementary in a musculoskeletal imaging center.


Achilles Tendon Tibialis Anterior Extensor Digitorum Longus Posterior Compartment Anterior Compartment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Gray H. The Complete Gray’s Anatomy, 16th ed., pp.402–416.London: Longman, Green, and Co., 1905.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartonicek J. Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 2003;25(5–6):379–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gray H. The Complete Gray’s Anatomy, 16th ed., pp.558–566.London: Longman, Green, and Co., 1905.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chepuri NB, Jacobson JA, Fessell DP et al. Sonographic appearance of the peroneus quadratus muscle: Correlation with MR imaging appearance in seven patients. Radiology 2001;218(2):415–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buschmann WR, Cheung Y, Jahss MH. Magnetic resonance imaging of anomalous leg muscles: Accessory soleus, peroneus quartus and the flexor digitorum longus accessories. Foot Ankle 1991;218(2):415–419.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lorentzon R, Wirell S. Anatomic variations of the accessory soleus muscle. Acta Radiol 1987;28:627–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gray H. The Complete Gray’s Anatomy, 16th ed., pp.926–930. London: Longman, Green, and Co., 1905.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruber H, Kovacs P. Sonographic anatomy of the peripheral nervous system. In Peer S, Bodner G (eds.). High Resolution Sonography of the Peripheral Nervous System, 1st ed., pp.28–32. New York: Springer, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bottger B, Schweitzer M, K El-Noueam et al. MR imaging of the normal and abnormal retrocalcaneal bursae. AJR 1998;170(5):1239–1241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Astrom M, Gentz C-F, Nilsson P. Imaging in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: A comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in 27 histologically verified cases. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:615–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M.D. O’Neill
    • 1
  1. 1.Staff Radiologist, Musculoskeletal Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Department St. Joseph’s HealthcareMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations