Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Anterior Surgical Approach

  • B. Sonny BalEmail author
  • Joel Matta


Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with less surgical trauma is of interest to surgeons and patients because early recovery parameters are improved over standard techniques, and the procedure can be done with less surgical trauma and with shorter insicions.1,2 So-called minimally invasive THA (MIS-THA) procedures have been described with two small incisions, and in the hands of selected surgeons, the two-incision MIS-THA offers accelerated hospital discharge, and an earlier return to function when compared with traditional methods of performing THA.3,4 In the two-incision technique, the anterior incision and dissection are performed in the Smith-Petersen surgical interval. THA done with this method is a true muscle-sparing approach that is less invasive than any other method that divides or detaches tendons. Excellent outcomes of THA done with other variations of the anterior approach have been reported previously.57

Unlike the more commonly utilized posterior and direct lateral approaches to THA in the United States, the Smith-Petersen surgical approach allows access to the hip joint without dividing tendons or splitting muscle fibers. The two-incision MIS-THA is performed by implanting the acetabular component placement through the Smith-Petersen interval; femoral component placement is similar to an intramedullary rod placement during blind nailing of the femur.8 The advantage of the single-incision anterior approach is that implantation of both acetabular and femoral components can be achieved with a single incision alone. This chapter will describe the key steps in the single-incision anterior THA technique, identify potential dangers, and discuss the early clinical outcomes. The authors’ reasons for adopting this particular technique for routine primary THA were: (1) preservation of the hip musculature, (2) ability to accurately position prosthetic components and judge leg lengths, (3) to decrease complications, such as posterior hip dislocation, and (4) to increase patient satisfaction with THA.


Femoral Head Preoperative Templating Tensor Muscle Posterior Acetabular Wall Anterior Surgical Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):78–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, et al. Early pain and functional results comparing minimally invasive to conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(6):1153–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;(417):232–41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duwelius PJ. Two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: techniques and results to date. Instr Course Lect 2006;55:215–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Light TR, Keggi KJ. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;441:255–60Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sahm DF, Critchley IA, Kelly LJ, et al. Evaluation of current activities of fluoroquinolones against gram-negative bacilli using centralized in vitro testing and electronic surveillance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45(1):267–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:115–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoppenfield S, deBoer P. Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith-Petersen MN. Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1949;31A:40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nogler M, Krismer M, Hozack WJ, Merritt P, Rachbauer F, Mayr E. A double offset broach handle for preparation of the femoral cavity in minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(8):1206–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berger RA. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 2004;53:149–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matta J. A one incision anterior MIS approach. In: Advances in Arthroplasty: Battle of the Bearing Surfaces and Surgical Techniques; Boston; Harvard Advances in Arthroplasty Course 2004Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ballesta S, Conejo MC, Garcia I, Rodriguez-Martinez JM, Velasco C, Pascual A. Survival and resistance to imipenem of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on latex gloves. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57(5):1010–2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):39–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chambers LW, Rhee P, Baker BC, et al. Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Arch Surg 2005;140(1):26–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A(7):1353–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(4):701–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:86–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004;35(2):163–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP, Trousdale RT. The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:63–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McConnell T, Tornetta P, III, Benson E, Manuel J. Gluteus medius tendon injury during reaming for gamma nail insertion. Clin Orthop 2003;(407):199–202Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matta JM, Ferguson TA. The anterior approach for hip replacement. Orthopedics 2005;28(9):927–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weil Y, Mattan Y, Kandel L, Eisenberg O, Liebergall M. Navigation-assisted minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthoplasty. Orthopedics 2006;29(3):200–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beaule PE, Campbell P, Lu Z, et al. Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(Suppl 4):85–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations