Skip to main content

Graded exercise testing (ET) is performed by family physicians, internists and cardiologists. Currently, only about 13% of family physicians and 29% of internists perform this procedure in the cardiac evaluation of patients [1, 2]. A survey of the graduates of one family medicine residency program found a decrease in the percent of graduates performing exercise testing from 14.9% in the graduation years of 1975–1983 to 5.3% in the graduation years of 1994–2003 [3]. While the American Board of Internal Medicine requires its members to do this procedure, the number of internists performing exercise testing continues to decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. http://wwwlaafp.org/online/en/home/aboutus/specialty/facts/64.html

  2. Wigton RS, Alguire P. The declining number and variety of procedures done by general internists: A resurvey of members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:355–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ringdahl E, Delzell JE, Kruse RL. Changing practice patterns of Family Medicine graduates: A comparison of alumni surveys from 1998–2004. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:404–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Exercise Treadmill Score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:793–800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morrow K, Morris CK, Froelicher VF, et al. Prediction of cardiovascular disease in men undergoing noninvasive evaluation for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:689–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herbert DL, Herbert WG. Legal Aspects of Preventive, Rehabilitative and Recreational Exercise Programs, 4th edition. Canton, Ohio: PRC Publishing, Inc., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edelman PS. The Case of Tart v. McGann: Legal Implications Associated with Exercise Stress Testing. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1987;1:24–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herbert DL, Herbert WG. The practice and unauthorized practice of medicine and other allied health professions. In: Herbert DL, Herbert WG, editors. Legal Aspects of Preventive, Rehabilitative and Recreational Exercise Programs. Canton, Ohio: PRC Publishing, Inc., 2002; 113–44.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herbert DL. New Cardiac Rehabilitation Guidelines to be Developed. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1993;7:15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herbert DL. Standards of care for health and fitness facilities are ever evolving. ACSM’s Health and Fitness J 2000;4:18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzales v. Roth, et al., Case No. 90CV1570, District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 564 N.Y.S.2d.387 (A.D. 1 Dept. 1991), reversed in, Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 584 N.Y.S.2d. (Ct.App.1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harvey v. Stanley, 803 S.W.2d.721 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Melito v. Genesee Hospital, 561 N.Y.S.2d.951 (A.D.4 Dept. 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tart v. McGann, 697 F.2d. 75,77 (2d.Cir.1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Herbert DL. Informed Consent and New Disclosure Responsibilities for Exercise Stress Testing: The Case of Hedgecorth v. United States. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1987;1:30–2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herbert DL. Who Will Judge Your Professional Conduct in Court? The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1987;1:14–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hedgecorth V. United States, 618 F. Supp. 627(Dist.Co., E.D.Mo.) at 631–632.

    Google Scholar 

  20. American Heart Association. The Exercise Standards Book: 1978:12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. American Heart Association. Exercise Testing and Training of Individuals with Heart Disease or At High Risk for Its Development: A Handbook for Physicians. 1975; 52.

    Google Scholar 

  22. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1986; 145–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. American Heart Association, Greater Los Angeles Affiliate, Guidelines For Cardiac Rehabilitation Centers (revised Second Edition:71, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 6th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams&Wilkins, 2000; 53.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fletcher GF, Balady G, Froelicher VF, et al. Exercise Standards. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. Circulation 1995;91:580–615.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, Hartley LH, et al. Exercise Standards. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 1990;82:2286–322.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herbert DL. Sample informed consent forms from the AHA, AACVRP and the ACSM. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1991;5:7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Herbert DL. Word choices for informed consent documents may render process invalid. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1992;6:43–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hidding v. Williams, 578 S.2d 1192 (La.Ct. Appeals, Fifth Cir. 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Herbert DL. Exercise stress testing lawsuit results in defense verdict. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1990;4:23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Herbert DL. Informed consent and new disclosure responsibilities for exercise stress testing: The Case of Hedgecorth v. United States. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1987;1:30–2.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Herbert DL. Nurse can act as physician’s agent in obtaining informed consent. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1989;3:81.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Debusk RF. Exercise test supervision: Time for reassessment. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1988;2:65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Herbert DL. Medico-legal concerns and risk management suggestions for medical directors of exercise rehabilitation programs. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1989;3:44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Herbert DL. Are nutritionists engaged in the unauthorized practice of medicine? The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1988;2:76–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Herbert DL. Is physician supervision of exercise stress testing required? The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1988;2:6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Herbert DL. Who will judge your professional conduct in court? The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1987;1:14–6.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ribisl PM. Uncertainties regarding medical supervision and maximal graded exercise testing prior to exercise training. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1987;1:6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Westlaw data base search was conducted using search terms: “exercise testing”, “treadmill testing” or “GXT”.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Michael Corbett v. Virginia Mason Hospital, King County (WA) Superior Court Case No. 92-2-28260-7. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1995;9:30.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gage v. Long, Case No. 579-025 (Orange County, CA, Superior Court). The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1992;6:73.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Estate of Guy O. Gangi, deceased v. Dr. Carl E. Berkowitz, Cook County (IL) Circuit Court, Case No. 88L-1 3066. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter (Herbert DL) 1994;8:44.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kolodny v. United States, Civil Case No. M-74-108, United States District Court, Maryland, 1975. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1988;2:6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Crook v. Funk, 447 S.E.2d 60 (Ga.App. 1994). The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1995;9:24–5.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Raymond Dolney and Nancy Dolney v. E.A. DeChellis, Trumbull County (OH) Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 91CV1279. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1994;8:27.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hoem v. Zia, 606 N.E.2d 818 (Ill. App. 4 Dist. 1992). The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1993;7:17.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bobby Carpenter, Ph.D. v. Arlington Memorial Hospital, Tarrant County (TX) District Court, Case No. 48-1127236-90. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1994;8:93.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ronald and Christine Bonnes v. R.P. Feidner, M.D. and John U. Lanman, M.D., 622 N.E.2d 197 (Ind. App. 3 Dist. 1993). The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1994;8:29.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Herbert DL. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1994;8:94.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lynda Kelly as Administrator of the Estate of John Kelly v. George Berk, M.D. and Peter Mercurio, M.D., Westchester County (NY) Supreme Court, Index No. 10564/90. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1993;7:73.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Taylor v. Mobil Corp., 444 S.E2d 705 (Va. 1994). The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 1995;9:25.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Guida v. Lesser, 2003 Ga.App.LEXIS 1297. The Exercise Standards and Malpractice Reporter 2004; 18: 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rodgers GP, Ayanian JZ, Balady G, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Stress Testing. Circulation 2000;102: 1726–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herbert, D.L., Herbert, W.G., White, R.D., Froelicher, V.F. (2009). Legal Aspects of Graded Exercise Testing. In: Evans, C.H., White, R.D. (eds) Exercise Stress Testing for Primary Care and Sports Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76597-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76597-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76596-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76597-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics