Clinical Gait Evaluation of the Athlete

  • Bruce Williams


How an athlete walks and runs is a key element to the functional capacity of their chosen sport. Being able to fully evaluate these motions can give practitioners a tremendous amount of information in aiding athletic patients. Running and walking mechanics were first recorded using filming techniques in the 1800s [1]. Over the last 40 years, gait analysis techniques have evolved from 2D to full 3D kinematic studies. Ground reaction forces have evolved from force plate analysis to include in-shoe pressure systems. The combination of 3-dimensional (3D) kinematic data and ground reaction forces has led to the potential for specific joint force calculations through kinetics, and now joint coupling techniques to understand how one joint potentially affects another [2, 3].


Gait evaluation Gait in the athlete 2D video analysis for gait Pressure analysis of shoes 


  1. 1.
    Cavanagh PR: “The Mechanics of Distance Running: A Historical Perspective,” p. 1, in Cavanagh PR (ed.), Biomechanics of Distance Running, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McClay I: The evolution of the study of the mechanics of running: relationship to injury. JAPMA, 90(3), March 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curran SA, Dananberg, HJ: Future of gait analysis: A podiatric medical perspective, JAPMA, 95(2), March/April 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nesbit SM, Serrano M: Work and power analysis of the golf swing, J Sport Sci Med, 4:520–533, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis IS: Gait retraining in runners. Orthop Pract, 17(2),2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wikstrom EA, Tillman MD, Chmielewski TL et al.: Dynamic Postural Stability Deficits in Subjects with Self-Reported Ankle Instability. Med Sci Sport Exerc, 39, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams BE, Yakel JD: Clinical uses of in-shoe pressure analysis in Podiatric Sports Medicine, JAPMA, 97(1): January/February 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stell JF, Buckley JG: Controlling excessive pronation: a comparison of casted and non-casted orthoses. The Foot, 8: 210, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Genova JM, Gross MT: Effect of foot orthotics on calcaneal eversion during standing and treadmill walking for subjects with abnormal pronation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 30: 664, 2000.[Medline].PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richie DH: Effects of foot orthoses on patients with chronic ankle instability. JAPMA, 97(1): January/February 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herring KM: Pertinent pearls on treating overuse injuries in endurance athletes. Podiatry Today, April 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanner WH, O’Halloran WD: The biomechanics, etiology, and treatment of cycling injuries. JAPMA, 90(7): July/August 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oatis CA: Goals of Gait Assessment, P. 328 in Craik RL, Oats CA (ed.), Gait Analysis, CV Mosby, St Louis, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gage JR, Ounpuu S: Gait analysis in clinical practice. Semin Ortho 4:72, 1989.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tropp H, Odenick P, Gillquist J: Stabilometry recordings in functional and mechanical instability of the ankle joint. Int J Sports Med 6: 180, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dingwell JB, Davis, BL: A rehabilitation treadmill with software for providing real-time gait analysis and visual feedback; Transactions of the ASME. J Biomech Eng, 118(2):253–255, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dananberg HJ: Gait style as an etiology to chronic postural pain: part I. Functional hallux limitus. JAPMA, 83:433, 1993.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dananberg HJ, Guliano M: Chronic low-back pain and its response to custom-made foot orthoses. JAPMA, 89:109, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sajko SS, Pierrynowski MR: Influence of treadmill design on rearfoot pronation during gait at different speeds. JAPMA, 95(5): September/October 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walsh M, Connolly P, Jenkison A, O’Brien T: Leg length discrepancy – an experimental study of compensatory changes in three dimensions using gait analysis. Gait Posture 12:156–161, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarnow M, Veves A, Giurini J, Rosenblum B, Habershaw G: In-shoe foot pressure measurements in diabetic patients with at-risk feet and in healthy subjects. Diabetes Care: 17, 9, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fuller A: Center of pressure and its theoretical relationship to foot pathology. JAPMA, 89: 278, 1999.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jong Paik N, Sik Im M: The path of center of pressure of the foot during walking. J Korean Acad Rehab Med, 21: 762, 1997.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scherer PR, Sobiesk GA: The center of pressure index in the evaluation of foot orthoses in shoes. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 11: 355, 199.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Private PracticeBreakthrough PodiatryMerrillvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations