Nutrient and other environmental controls of harmful cyanobacterial blooms along the freshwater–marine continuum

  • Hans Paerl
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 619)


Nutrient and hydrologic conditions strongly influence harmful planktonic and benthic cyanobacterial bloom (CHAB) dynamics in aquatic ecosystems ranging from streams and lakes to coastal ecosystems. Urbanization, agricultural and industrial development have led to increased nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) discharge, which affect CHAB potentials of receiving waters. The amounts, proportions and chemical composition of N and P sources can influence the composition, magnitude and duration of blooms. This, in turn, has ramifications for food web dynamics (toxic or inedible CHABs), nutrient and oxygen cycling and nutrient budgets. Some CHABs are capable of N2 fixation, a process that can influence N availability and budgets. Certain invasive N2 fixing taxa (e.g., Cylindrospermopsis, Lyngbya) also effectively compete for fixed N during spring, N–enriched runoff periods, while they use N2 fixation to supplant their N needs during N–deplete summer months. Control of these taxa is strongly dependent on P supply. However, additional factors, such as molar N:P supply ratios, organic matter availability, light attenuation, freshwater discharge, flushing rates (residence time) and water column stability play interactive roles in determining CHAB composition (i.e. N2 fixing vs. non–N2 fixing taxa) and biomass. Bloom potentials of nutrient–impacted waters are sensitive to water residence (or flushing) time, temperatures (preference for >15 °C), vertical mixing and turbidity. These physical forcing features can control absolute growth rates of bloom taxa. Human activities may affect “bottom up” physical–chemical modulators either directly, by controlling hydrologic, nutrient, sediment and toxic discharges, or indirectly, by influencing climate. Control and management of cyanobacterial and other phytoplankton blooms invariably includes nutrient input constraints, most often focused on N and/or P. While single nutrient input constraints may be effective in some water bodies, dual N and P input reductions are usually required for effective long–term control and management of blooms. In some systems where hydrologic manipulations (i.e., plentiful water supplies) are possible, reducing the water residence time by flushing and artificial mixing (along with nutrient input constraints) can be effective alternatives. Blooms that are not readily consumed and transferred up the food web will form a relatively large proportion of sedimented organic matter. This, in turn, will exacerbate sediment oxygen demand, and enhance the potential for oxygen depletion and release of nutrients back to the water column. This scenario is particularly problematic in long–residence time (i.e., months) systems, where blooms may exert a strong positive feedback on future events. Implications of these scenarios and the confounding issues of climatic (hydrologic) variability, including droughts, tropical storms, hurricanes and floods, will be discussed in the context of developing effective CHAB control strategies along the freshwater–marine continuum


Cyanobacterial Bloom Neuse River Estuary Coastal Eutrophication Water Column Stability Water Resource Research Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boesch DF, Burreson E, Dennison W, Houde E, Kemp M, Kennedy V, Newell R, Paynter K, Orth R, Ulanowicz R (2001) Factors in the decline of coastal ecosystems. Science 293: 629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carmichael WW (1997) The cyanotoxins. Advances in Botanical Research 27:211–256Google Scholar
  3. Carmichael WW (1998) Microcystin concentrations in human livers, estimation of human lethal dose–lessons from Caruaru, Brazil. In: Paerl HW, Carmichael WW (eds) Proc of the 4th International Conference on Toxic Cyanobacteria, Beaufort, NC, Sept 1998Google Scholar
  4. Chapman AD, Schelske CL (1997) Recent appearance of Cylindrospermopsis (Cyanobacteria) in five hypereutrophic Florida lakes. J Phycol 33:191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chorus I, Bartram J (eds) (1999) Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water. E&F Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Codd GA, Bell SG (1996) The occurrence and fate of blue–green algal toxins in freshwaters. ,bt.National Rivers Authority, R & D Report 29, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Diaz RJ, Solow A (1999) Ecological and Economic Consequences of Hypoxia. Topic 2 Report for the Integrated Assessment of Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 16. NOAA COP, Silver Spring, MD, 45pp.Google Scholar
  8. Downing JA, Watson SB, McCauley E (2001) Predicting Cyanobacteria dominance in lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58: 1905–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edmondson WT, Lehman JT (1981) The effect of changes in the nutrient income and conditions of Lake Washington. Limnol Oceanogr 26:1–29Google Scholar
  10. Elmgren R, Larsson U (2001) Nitrogen and the Baltic Sea: Managing nitrogen in relation to phosphorus. The Scientific World 1(S2): 371–377Google Scholar
  11. Elser JJ (1999) The pathway to noxious cyanobacteria blooms in lakes: The food web as the final turn. Freshwater Biol 42: 537–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fogg GE (1969) The physiology of an algal nuisance. Proc R Soc London B. 173:175–189Google Scholar
  13. Ghadouani A, Pinel–Alloul B, Prepas EE (2003) Effects of experimentally induced cyanobacterial blooms on crustacean zooplankton communities. Freshwater Biol 48: 363–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hallegraeff GM (1993) A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia 32:79–99Google Scholar
  15. Healy FP (1982) Phosphate. In: Carr NG, Whitton BA (eds) The Biology of Cyanobacteria. Blackwell Scientific Public, Oxford, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
  16. Horne AJ (1977) Nitrogen fixation.– a review of this phenomenon as a polluting process. Progr Wat Technol 8:359–372Google Scholar
  17. Kononen K, Kuparinen J, Mäkelä J, Laanemets J, Pavelson J, Nõmmann S (1996) Initiation of cyanobacterial blooms in a frontal region at the entrance to the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 41:98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Konopka A (1984) Effect of light–nutrient interactions on buoyancy regulation by planktonic cyanobacteria. In: Klug MJ, Reddy CA (eds) Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, DC, pp 41–48Google Scholar
  19. Konopka A, Brock TD, Walsby AE (1978) Buoyancy regulation by planktonic blue–green algae in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Arch Hydrobiol 83:524–537Google Scholar
  20. Lean DRS (1973) Movement of phosphorus between its biologically–important forms in lakewater. J Fish Res Bd Canada 30:1525–1536Google Scholar
  21. Likens GE (ed) (1972) Nutrients and Eutrophication. American Soc Limnol Oceanogr Special Symp 1Google Scholar
  22. McQueen DJ (1990) Manipulating lake community structure: where do we go from here? Freshwater Biol 23: 613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moisander PH, Paerl HW (2000) Growth, primary productivity, and nitrogen fixation potential of Nodularia spp. (Cyanophyceae) in water from a subtropical estuary in the United States. J Phycol 36:645–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moisander PH, McClinton III E, Paerl HW (2002a) Salinity effects on growth, photosynthetic parameters, and nitrogenase activity in estuarine planktonic cyanobacteria. Microb Ecol 43:432–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moisander PH, Hench JL, Kononen K, Paerl HW (2002b) Small–scale shear effects on heterocystous cyanobacteria. Limnol Oceanogr 47: 108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moss B, Madgwick J, Phillips JG (1996) A guide to the restoration of nutrient–enriched shallow lakes. W.W. Hawes, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  27. Niemi A (1979) Blue–green algal blooms and N:P ratio in the Baltic Sea. Acta Bot Fenn 110:57–61Google Scholar
  28. Nixon SW (1986) Nutrient dynamics and the productivity of marine coastal waters. In: Halwagy R, Clayton D, Behbehani M (eds) The Alden Press, Oxford, pp 97–115Google Scholar
  29. Nixon SW (1995) Coastal eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia:199–220Google Scholar
  30. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (1996) Report of the NC State Senate Select Committee on Fish Kills and Water Quality, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  31. North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources–Div. Water Quality (2001) Phase II of the Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Nitrogen to the Neuse River Estuary, NC. NCDENR–DWQ, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  32. Padisak J (1997) Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii(Woloszynska) Seenayya et Subba Raju, an expanding, highly adaptive cyanobacterium: worldwide distribution and review of its ecology. Archive fur Hydrobiologie Suppl. 107:563–593.Google Scholar
  33. Paerl HW (1983) Environmental factors promoting and regulating N2 fixing blue–green algal blooms in the Chowan River, NC. Univ of North Carolina Water Resources Research Instit Report No. 176, 65 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Paerl HW (1986) Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater blue–green algae (cyanobacteria), In: Sandgren CD (ed) Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge Univ PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Paerl HW (1987) Dynamics of blue–green algal blooms in the lower Neuse River, NC: Causative factors and potential controls. Univ of North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute Report No 229, 164 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Paerl HW (1988) Nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters. Limnol Oceanogr 33:823–847Google Scholar
  37. Paerl HW (1990) Physiological ecology and regulation of N2 fixation in natural waters. Adv Microbiol Ecol 11:305–344Google Scholar
  38. Paerl HW (1996) A comparison of cyanobacterial bloom dynamics is freshwater, estuarine and marine environments. Phycologia 35(6):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paerl HW (1997) Coastal eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: Importance of atmospheric deposition and groundwater as “new” nitrogen and other nutrient sources. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1154–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paerl HW, Mallin MA, Donahue CA, Go M, Peierls BL (1995) Nitrogen loading sources and eutrophication of the Neuse River Estuary, NC: Direct and indirect roles of atmospheric deposition. UNC Water Resources Research Instit Report No 291. Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  41. Paerl HW, Millie DF (1996) Physiological ecology of toxic cyanobacteria. Phycologia 35(6):160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paerl HW, Whitall DR (1999) Anthropogenically–derived atmospheric nitrogen deposition, marine eutrophication and harmful algal bloom expansion: Is there a link? Ambio 28:307–311.Google Scholar
  43. Paerl HW, Fulton RS, Moisander PH, Dyble J (2001) Harmful Freshwater Algal Blooms, With an Emphasis on Cyanobacteria. The Scientific World 1:76–113.Google Scholar
  44. Paerl HW, Kuparinen J (2002) Microbial aggregates and consortia. In: Bitton G (ed) Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 1. John Wiley and Sons, Inc New York, NY, pp 160–181Google Scholar
  45. Paerl HW, Valdes LM, Pinckney JL, Piehler MF, Dyble J, Moisander PH (2003) Phytoplankton photopigments as Indicators of Estuarine and Coastal Eutrophication. BioScience 53(10) 953–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paerl HW, Valdes LM, Piehler MF, Lebo ME (2004) Solving problems resulting from solutions: The evolution of a dual nutrient management strategy for the eutrophying Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Environmental Science & Technology 38:3068–3073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pearsall W (1932) Phytoplankton in the English Lakes. 2. The composition of the phytoplankton in relation to dissolved substances. Journal of Ecology 20:241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Piehler MF, Dyble J, Moisander PH, Pinckney JL, Paerl HW (2002) Effects of modified nutrient concentrations and ratios on the structure and function of the native phytoplankton community in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina USA. Aquat Ecol 36: 371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pinckney JL, Millie DF, Vinyard BT, Paerl HW (1997) Environmental controls of phytoplankton bloom dynamics in the Neuse River Estuary (North Carolina, USA). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54:2491–2501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reynolds CS (1987) Cyanobacterial water blooms. Adv Bot Res 13:67–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds CS, Walsby AE (1975) Water blooms. Biol Rev 50:437–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richardson K (1997) Harmful or exceptional phytoplankton blooms in the marine ecosystem. Adv Mar Biol 31:302–385Google Scholar
  53. Ryther JH, Dunstan WM (1971) Nitrogen, phosphorus and eutrophication in the coastal marine environment. Science 171:1008–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schindler DW (1975) Whole–lake eutrophication experiments with phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon. Verh Int Verein Theor Angew Limnol 19:3221–3231Google Scholar
  55. Shapiro J (1990) Current beliefs regarding dominance of blue–greens: The case for the importance of CO2 and pH. Int Verein Theor Angew Limnol Verh 24:38–54Google Scholar
  56. Scheffer M (1998) Ecology of shallow lakes. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith VH (1983) Low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios favor dominance by blue–green algae in lake phytoplankton. Science 221:669–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith VH (1990) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and nitrogen fixation in lacustrine and estuarine ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 35:1852–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stow CA, Borsuk ME, Stanley DW (2001) Long–term changes in watershed nutrient inputs and riverine exports in the Neuse River, North Carolina. Water Research 35:1489–1499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tedder SW, Sauber J, Ausley L, Mitchell S (1980) Working Paper: Neuse River Investigation 1979. Division of Environmental Management, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  61. Tilman D, Kiesling RL (1984) Freshwater algal ecology: Taxonomic tradeoffs in the temperature dependence of nutrient competitive abilities. In: Klug MJ, Reddy CA (eds) Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology. American Soc Microbiol Washington, DC, pp 314–320Google Scholar
  62. Vincent WF (ed) (1987) Dominance of bloom forming cyanobacteria (Blue–green algae). NZ Jour Mar and Freshwat Res 21(3):361–542Google Scholar
  63. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenko J, Mellilo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vollenweider RA, Kerekes JJ (1982) Eutrophication of waters: Monitoring, assessment and control. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  65. Vollenweider, RA, Marchetti R, Viviani R (eds) (1992) Marine Coastal Eutrophication. Elsevier Science, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Paerl
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine SciencesMorehead City

Personalised recommendations