Strategies to Compensate for Apraxia Among Stroke Clients

  • Caroline van Heugten
  • Chantal Geusgens

Abstract

Apraxia influences the daily life of stroke clients. Strategy training is the preferred intervention because it is expected to include generalization; that is, training effects are established from trained to nontrained tasks and across settings.

Apraxia is a “cognitive disorder characterized by the inability to perform previously learned skills” (National Library of Medicine, 2008) that influences stroke clients’ ability to perform daily life tasks (Bjorneby and Reinvang, 1985; Foundas, 1985). Treatment of apraxia should be part of a rehabilitation program because of its negative impact on daily life. Cognitive strategy training is the preferred form of treatment, as it focuses on improving daily life functioning by compensating for lost functions, despite the probably lasting presence of apraxia. In addition, strategy training has the advantage over skills training because of generalization of training results to other tasks and other contexts.

Keywords

Apraxia Generalization Stroke 

References

  1. Arnadóttir, G.T. (1990). The Brain and Behaviour. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, C., and Edwards, D. (2001). Activity Card Sort Test Kit. St Louis, MO: Washington University.Google Scholar
  3. Bjorneby, E.R., and Reinvang, I.R. (1985). Acquiring and maintaining self-care skills after stroke. The predictive value of apraxia. Scand J Rehabil Med, 17, 75–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cicerone, K.D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., et al (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81, 1596–1615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cicerone, K.D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., et al (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86(8), 1681–1692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Renzi, E. Apraxia. (1989). In: Boller, F., and Grafman, J., eds. Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elseviers Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. De Renzi, E., and Lucchelli, F. (1988). Ideational apraxia. Brain, 111, 1173–1185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Renzi, E., Motti, F., and Nichelli, P. (1980). Imitating gestures: a quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol, 37, 6–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doman, G.A., Fisher, M., Macleod, M., and Davis, S.M. (2008). Stroke. Lancet, 371(9624), 1612–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donkervoort, M., Dekker, J., Stehmann-Saris, J.C., and Deelman, B.G. (2001). Efficacy of strategy training in left hemisphere stroke patients with apraxia: a randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 11(5), 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmans, J.A., Webster, J., and Lincoln, N. (2000). A comparison of two approaches in the treatment of perceptual problems after stroke. Clin Rehabil, 1, 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foundas, A.L., Macauley, B.C., Rayner, A.M., Maher, L.M., Heilman, K.M., and Rothi, L.J.G. (1985). Ecological implications of limb apraxia: evidence from mealtime behaviour. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 1, 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geusgens, C.A. (2007). Transfer of Cognitive Strategy Training After Stroke: No Place Like Home? Maastricht: Neuropsych Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Geusgens, C.A., Winkens, I., Van Heugten, C.M., Jolles, J., and Heuvel, W. van den (2007b). Occurrence and measurement of transfer in cognitive rehabilitation: a critical review. J Rehabil Med, 39(6), 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geusgens, C.A.V., van Heugten, C.M., Cooijmans, J.P.J., Jolles, J., and Heuvel, W.J.A. van den (2007a). Transfer effects of a cognitive strategy training for stroke patients with apraxia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 29(8), 831–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heilman, K.M., Gonzalez-Rothi, L.J. Apraxia. (1985). In: Heilman, K.M., and Valenstein, E., eds. Clinical Neuropsychology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kielhofner, G. (2004). Conceptual Foundations of Occupational Therapy, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar
  18. Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., McColl, M., Polatajko, H., and Pollock, N. (1998). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 3rd ed. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, N. (1986). Dyspraxia and Its Management. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  20. National Library of Medicine. (2008). PubMed: MeSH is NLM’s controlled vocabulary used for indexing articles in PubMed. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed.Google Scholar
  21. Schiffrin, R.M., and Schneider, W. (1997). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev, 8, 127–190.Google Scholar
  22. Shelton, P.A., and Knopman, D.S. (1991). Ideomotor apraxia in Huntington’s disease. Arch Neurol, 48, 35–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singley, M.K., and Anderson, J.R. (1989). The Transfer of Cognitive Skill. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Smania, N., Girardi, F., Domenicali, C., Lora, E., and Aglioti, S. (2000). The rehabilitation of limb apraxia: a study in left-brain damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81, 379–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stehmann-Saris, J.C., Van Heugten, C.M., Kinebanian, A., and Dekker, J. (1996). [OT guideline for assessment and treatment of apraxia in stroke clients]. Utrecht: Nivel, Amsterdam and Hogeschool van AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Sundet, K., Finset, A., and Reinvang, I.R. (1988). Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 10(4), 363–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tate, R.L., and McDonald, S. (1995). What is apraxia? The clinicians dilemma. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 5(4), 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trombly, C.A., and Ma, H. (2002). A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke. Part I: Restoration of roles, tasks and activities. Am J Occup Ther, 5, 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Heugten, C.M. (2001). Rehabilitation and management of apraxia after stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol, 11, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Hengten C.M., Dekker, J., Deelman, B.G., Dijk, A.J., A.J. Van Stehmann-Saries, J.C., and Kinebanian, A. (1998). Outcome of strategy training in stroke patients with apraxia: a phase II study. Clin Rehabil,12, 294–303.Google Scholar
  31. Van Hengten C.M., Dekker, J., Deelman, B.G., Dijk, A.J., A.J. Van Stehmann-Saries, J.C., and Kinebanian, A. (2000). Measuring disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia: a validation study of an observational method. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 10(4), 401–414.Google Scholar
  32. West, C., Bowen, A., Hesketh, A., and Vail, A. (2008). Interventions for motor apraxia following stroke (Review). Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 23(1),CD004132.Google Scholar
  33. Zwinkels, A., Geusgens, C., Sande. P., and van Heugten, C. (2004). Assessment of apraxia: inter-rater reliability of a new apraxia test, association between apraxia and other cognitive deficits and prevalence of apraxia in a rehabilitation setting. Clin Rehabil, 18(7), 819–827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline van Heugten
    • 1
  • Chantal Geusgens
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations