Experiencing Inca Domination in Northwestern Argentina and the Southern Andes

  • Félix A. Acuto

Andean scholars often perceive northwestern Argentina in particular, and the South Andes in general, as a marginal area of Tawantinsuyu (literally, “land of the four quarters”, the Inca name for their Empire) and, therefore, that Inca domination had a shallow impact on local societies. There are a number of reasons for this perception. First, the South Andes are far from the core of the Empire. Second, Inca architecture and material objects in this part of Tawantinsuyu are not as abundant as in the Central Andes, nor do they exhibit, in comparison, high quality and great investment of labor. Third, toward the end of Tawantinsuyu’s history, the Incas were clearly more interested in the northern frontier than in the southlands. Fourth, it is generally believed that Inca occupation only lasted a few years in this southern corner of Tawantinsuyu, from approximately AD 1470 until the Spanish conquest [Note 1].

Contrary to these ideas, I claim that Inca domination profoundly influenced the indigenous societies of the South Andes. Through the analysis of Inca domination from the point of view of the colonized, and how subjects experienced this new political context, I demonstrate the momentous impact Inca conquest had on native societies’ social life. First, I explore how the Inca conquest altered social dynamics among communities and created new social relations between different groups. While some native communities were affected by and marginalized from these relations, others benefited from Inca occupation. Then I move on to examine the transformations that Inca domination promoted in subject communities’ social and political structures. Next, I consider the ways indigenous people may have experienced Incaic places. I claim that this constituted a dramatic experience that shaped the identity of the colonized, as well as the identities of those whom the Incas sent as their representatives. In the final section I assess the aftermath of the Incas, demonstrating that Inca domination left an indelible mark on South Andean communities’ social practices and memory.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acuto, Félix A., 1999, Paisaje y dominación: la constitución del espacio social en el Imperio Inka. In Sed Non Satiata. Teoría Social en la Arqueología Latinoamericana Contemporánea, edited by Andrés Zarankin and Félix Acuto, pp. 33–75. Ediciones Del Tridente, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  2. Acuto, Félix A., 2004, Landscapes of Ideology and Inequality: Experiencing Inka Domination. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  3. Alconini, Sonia, 2004, The southeastern Inka frontier against the Chiriguanos: structure and dynamics of the Inka imperial borderlands. Latin American Antiquity 15 (4): 389–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bárcena, J. Roberto, 2001, Consideraciones generales y avances particulares sobre la dominación incaica en el Centro Oeste Argentino. Actas del XIII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Argentina Tomo I: 277–296, Córdoba.Google Scholar
  5. Castro, Victoria, 1992, Nuevos registros de la presencia Inka en la provincia del Loa, Chile. Gaceta Arqueológica Andina 4 (21): 139–54.Google Scholar
  6. Castro, Victoria and Luis E. Cornejo, 1990, Estudios en el pukara de Turi, norte de Chile. Gaceta Arqueológica Andina 5 (17): 57–66.Google Scholar
  7. Cornejo, Luis E., 2000, Los Inka y la construcción del espacio en Turi. http://www.geocities.com/lcbmchap2000/kalla.htm
  8. Coben, Lawrence S., 2006, Other Cuzcos: replicated theaters of Inka power. In Archaeology of Performance. Theaters of Power, Community, and Politics, edited by Takeshi Inomata and Lawrence S. Coben, pp. 223–259. AltaMira, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  9. Cremonte, María Beatriz, 1994, Las pastas cerámicas de Potrero Chaquiago (Catamarca). Producción y movilidad social. Arqueología, Revista de la Sección Arqueología 4: 133–164.Google Scholar
  10. Farrington, Ian, 1999, El Shincal: Un Cusco del Kollasuyu. In Actas del XII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Argentina, edited by Cármen Diéz Martín, Tomo I, pp. 53–62. La Plata.Google Scholar
  11. Gasparini, Graziano and Luise Margolies, 1980, Inca Architecture. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, Anthony, 1979, Central Problems in Social Theory. MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  13. Gifford, Chad, 2003, Local Matters: Encountering the Imperial Inkas in the South Andes. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Gifford, Chad and Félix Acuto, 2002, Space, place and Inka domination in northwest Argentina. In Experimental Archaeology: Replicating Past Objects, Behaviors, and Processes, edited by James R. Mathieu, pp. 95–110. BAR International Series, 1035, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. González, Alberto Rex, 1982, Las “provincias” Inca del antiguo Tucumán. Revista del Museo Nacional XLVI: 317–380.Google Scholar
  16. González, Alberto Rex, 1983, La provincia y la población incaica de Chicoana. In Presencia Hispánica en la Arqueología Argentina, edited by Eldo S. Morresi and Ramón Gutierrez, pp. 633–674. Instituto de Historia, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Nacional del Noreste, Chaco.Google Scholar
  17. González, Alberto Rex and Pío P. Díaz, 1992, Notas arqueológicas sobre la “Casa Morada”, La Paya, Salta. Estudios de Arqueología 5:9–61.Google Scholar
  18. Hyslop, John, 1990, Inka Settlement Planning. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  19. Hyslop, John and Juan Schobinger, 1991, Las ruinas incaicas de los Nevados del Aconquija (prov. de Tucumán, Argentina). Informe preliminar. In El Imperio Inka: Actualización y Perspectivas por Registros Arqueológicos y Etnohistóricos, Tomo II, pp. 15–30. Comechingonia 9, Córdoba.Google Scholar
  20. Krapovickas, Pedro, 1981–82, Hallazgos incaicos en Tilcara y Yacoraite (una reinterpretación). Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología 18: 67–80.Google Scholar
  21. Lorandi, Ana M., 1980, La frontera oriental del Tawantinsuyu: El Umasuyu y el Tucuman. Una hipótesis de trabajo. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología 14 (1): 147–164.Google Scholar
  22. Lorandi, Ana M., 1983, Mitayos y mitmaqkuna en el Tawantinsuyu meridional. Histórica 7 (1): 3–50.Google Scholar
  23. Lorandi, Ana M., 1988, Los Diaguitas y el Tawantinsuyu. Una hipótesis de conflicto. In La Frontera del Estado Inca, edited by Tom D. Dillehay and Patricia Netherly, pp. 215–234. BAR International Series, 442. Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Lorandi, Ana M., 1997, De Quimeras, Rebeliones y Utopías. La Gesta del Inca Pedro Bohorques. Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
  25. Lorandi, Ana M. and Roxana Boixadós, 1987–88, Etnohistoria de los Valles Calchaquíes en los siglos XVI y XVII. Runa 17–18: 263–419.Google Scholar
  26. Lynch, Thomas F., 1993, The identification of Inca posts and roads from Catarpe to Río Frío, Chile. In Provincial Inca: Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Assessment of the Impact of the Inca State, edited by Michael A. Malpass, pp. 117–142. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  27. McEwan, Colin and Maarten van de Guchte, 1992, Ancestral time and sacred space in Inca state ritual. In The Ancient Americas. Art from Sacred Landscapes, edited by Richard F. Townsend, pp. 359–371. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Menzel, Dorothy, 1959, The Inca occupation of the south coast of Peru. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 15 (2): 125–142.Google Scholar
  29. Meyers, Albert and Cornelius Ulbert, 1997, Inka archaeology in eastern Bolivia: some aspects of the Samaipata Project. Tawantinsuyu: An International Journal of Inka Studies 3: 80–85.Google Scholar
  30. Muñoz Ovalle, Ivan and Juan Chacama, 1999, Los valles serranos de Arica y Tacna en la órbita de los Incas. In Actas del XII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Argentina, edited by Carmen Diéz Martín, Tomo I, pp. 262–79. La Plata.Google Scholar
  31. Nielsen, Axel, 1998, Tendencias de larga duración en la ocupación humana del Altiplano de Lípez. In Los Desarrollos Locales y Sus Territorios: Arqueología del NOA y Sur de Bolivia, edited by María B. Cremonte, pp. 65–102. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, S.S. de Jujuy.Google Scholar
  32. Niemeyer, Hans, 1986, La ocupación Inkaica de la cuenca alta del Río Copiapó. In El Imperio Inka: actualización y perspectivas por registros arqueológicos y etnohistóricos Vol. 1, Edición Especial Revista Comechingonia 4: 165–294, Córdoba.Google Scholar
  33. Palma, Jorge R., 1998, Curacas y Señores: Una Visión del la Sociedad Política Prehispánica en la Quebrada de Humahuaca. Instituto Interdisciplinario Tilcara, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  34. Pärssinen, Martti and Ari Siiriäinen, 1997, Inka-style ceramics and their chronological relationship to the Inka expansion in the southern Lake Titicaca area. Latin American Antiquity 8: 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raffino, Rodolfo, 1981, Los Inkas del Kollasuyu. Ramos Americana Editora, La Plata.Google Scholar
  36. Raffino, Rodolfo, 1988, Poblaciones Indígenas de la Argentina. Editorial TEA, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  37. Raffino, Rodolfo (ed.), 1993, Inka: Arqueología, Historia y Urbanismo del Altiplano Andino. Corregidor, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  38. Raffino, Rodolfo, 1993–98, Réquiem por Watungasta. Revista Xama 6–11: 113–126.Google Scholar
  39. Raffino, Rodolfo, Diego Gobbo, R. Vázquez, Ayelén Capparelli, Victoria Montes, Rubén Itturriza, C. Deschamps and M. Mannasero, 1997, El ushnu del Shincal de Quimivil. Tawantinsuyu: An International Journal of Inka Studies 3: 22–39.Google Scholar
  40. Stanish, Charles, 2001, Regional research on the Inca. Journal of Archaeological Research 9 (3): 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Uribe, Mauricio, 2000, La arqueología del Inka en Chile. Revista Chilena de Antropología 15: 63–97.Google Scholar
  42. von Hagen, Adriana and Craig Morris, 1998, The Cities of the Ancient Andes. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, Verónica and Terence D’Altroy, 1998, El sur del Tawantinsuyu: un dominio selectivamente intensivo. Tawantinsuyu: An International Journal of Inka Studies 5: 170–178.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Félix A. Acuto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations