The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of symbol training in the past 40 years. Three symbol-training methods (i.e., paired-associate learning, recognition training, recall training) that were commonly used by ergonomists and industrial designers are identified. Factors affecting symbol-training effectiveness are given. Experimental design and analysis for symbol-training effectiveness research are also described. This review would be helpful in formulating research plans and methodology for conducting other symbol-training studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R.S. Goonetilleke, H.M. Shih, H.K. On, and J. Fritsch (2001) Effects of training and represen-tational characteristics in icon design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55: 741-760.
M.L. Blum and J.C. Naylor (1968) Training and learning. In H. Wayne and G. Murphy (eds.) Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundations. Harper & Row, New York, pp. 237-275.
R.W. Bailey (1996) Human performance engineering: Designing high quality professional user interfaces for computer products, applications and systems. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
E. Salas, K.A. Burgess, and J.A. Canon-Bowers (1995) Training effectiveness techniques. In J. Weimer (ed.), Research techniques in human engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 439-475.
R.W. Allen, Z. Parseghian, and P.G. Van Valkenburgh (1980) Simulator evaluation of age ef-fects on symbol sign recognition. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 24th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 471-475.
P. Cairney and D. Sless (1982) Communication effectiveness of symbolic safety signs with different user groups. Applied Ergonomics, 13: 91-97.
M.S. Wogalter, R.J. Sojourner, and J.W. Brelsford (1997) Comprehension and retention of safety pictorials. Ergonomics, 40: 531-542.
A.S. Ramakrishnan, R.L. Cranston, A. Rosiles, D. Wagner, and A. Mital (1999) Study of symbols coding in airway facilities. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25: 39-50.
M.F. Lesch (2003) Comprehension and memory for warning symbols: Age-related differences and impact of training. Journal of Safety Research, 34: 495-505.
A.H. Wang and C.C. Chi (2003) Effects of hazardous material symbol labeling and training on comprehension according to three types of educational specialization. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31: 343-355.
R.E. Walker, R.C. Nicolay, and C.R. Steams (1965) Comparative accuracy of recognizing American and international road signs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49: 322-325.
A.H. Wang and M.T. Chen (2000) Effects of symbolic pictorial, gender, and training on users’ comprehension for hazardous labels. Journal of Ergonomic Study, 2: 81-88 (in Chinese).
M.T. Chen and A.H. Wang (2003) Effects of dangerous materials symbols, educational background, and gender on conceptual compatibility. Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Journal, 11: 188-196 (in Chinese).
D. Griffith and T.R. Actkinson (1977) International road signs: interpretability and training techniques. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 21st Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 392-396.
B. Li (1999) Oxford advanced learner’s English-Chinese dictionary (Revised extended 4th ed.). Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
A.H. Wang, H.S. Lin, and M.T. Chen (2002) Effects of prohibitive traffic signs design on drivers’ subjective preference and visual performance under different driving velocities. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 19: 105-115 (in Chinese).
J. Brown (1976) An analysis of recognition and recall and of problems in their comparison. In J. Brown (ed.), Recall and recognition. Wiley, London, pp. 1-35.
R.J. Sternberg (2003) Cognitive psychology. Thomson/Wadsworth, Belmont, CA; Australia.
D. Fisk, W.A. Rogers, N. Charness, S.J. Czaja, and J. Sharit (2004) Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches.: CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; London.
S.J. Simon (2000) The relationship of learning style and training method to end-user com-puter use: a structural equation model. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 18: 41-59.
P.L. Bonate (2000) Analysis of pretest-posttest designs. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
A.J. Vickers The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 1.
C.L. Loprinzi, J.C. Michalak, S.K. Quella, J.R. O’Fallon, A.K. Hatfield, R.A. Nelimark, A.M. Dose, T. Fischer, C. Johnson, N.E. Klatt, W.W. Bate, R.M. Rospond, and J.E. Oesterling (1994) Megestrol acetate for the prevention of hot flashes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 331: 347-352.
H. Anderson, P. Hopwood, R.J. Stephens, N. Thatcher, B. Cottier, M. Nicholson, R. Milroy, T.S. Maughan, S.J. Falk, M.G. Bond, P.A. Burt, C.K. Connolly, M.B. Mclllmurray, and J. Carmichael (2000) Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer—a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. British Journal of Cancer, 83: 447-453.
T. Newby (1992) Training evaluation handbook. Gower, Aldershot, Hants, England.
C.I. Hovland, A.A. Lumsdaine, and F.D. Sheffield (1949) Experiments on mass communica- tion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
R.R. Hake (1998) Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66: 64-74.
K. Cummings, J. Marx, R. Thomton, and D. Kuhl (1999) Evaluating innovation in studio physics. Physics education research: A Supplement to the American Journal of Physics, 67: S38-S44.
E.F. Redish and R.N. Steinberg (1999) Teaching physics: Figuring out what works. Physics Today, 24-30.
D.E. Meltzer (2002) The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70: 1259-1268.
T.L.N. Emerson and B.A. Taylor (2004) Comparing student achievement across experimental and lecture-oriented sections of a principles of microeconomics course. Southern Economic Journal, 70: 672-693.
D.M. Dimitrov and P.D. Rumrill (2003) Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20: 159-165.
J.A. Gliner, G.A. Morgan, and R.J. Harmon (2003) Pretest-posttest comparison group de-signs: Analysis and interpretation. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42: 500-503.
E.R. Girden (1992) ANOVA: Repeated measures. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
M.L. Mitchell and J.M. Jolley (2004) Research design explained, 5th edition. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA; London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ng, A.W.Y., Chan, A.H.S. (2008). Factors Influencing Symbol-Training Effectiveness. In: Chan, A.H.S., Ao, SI. (eds) Advances in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74905-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74905-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74903-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74905-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)