Abstract
The development of digital technologies has drastically modified the requirements and constraints that a good image representation format should meet. Originally, the requirements were to achieve good compression efficiency while keeping the computational complexity low. This has led in 1992 to the standardization of the JPEG format, which is still widely used today (see Chapter 8). Over the years however, many things have evolved: more computing power is available and the development of Internet has required image representation formats to be more flexible and network- oriented, to enable efficient access to images through heterogeneous devices.
In spite of the strong temporal redundancy of video, in the Digital Cinema industry each image from a movie is compressed separately1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Daubechies I., Ten lectures on wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1992, ISBN 0–89871–274–2.
DCI. Digital cinema system specifications. Digital Cinema Initiatives (DCI), March 2005, URL http://www.dcimovies.com/.
Foos D.H., Muka E., Slone R.M., Erickson B.J., Flynn M.J., Clunie D.A., Hildebrand L., Kohm K.S., Young S.S., JPEG2000 compression of medical imagery. Proceedings of SPIE, 3980:85, 2003.
Fossel S., Fottinger G., Mohr J., Motion JPEG2000 for high quality video systems. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 49(4):787–791, 2003.
Janosky J., Witthus R.W., Using JPEG2000 for enhanced preservation and web access of digital archives. In IS&T’s 2004 Archiving Conference, pages 145– 149, April 2004.
Kellerer H., Pferschy U., Pisinger D. Knapsack Problems. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2004, ISBN 3–540–40286–1.
Mallat S., A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2nd edition, 1999.
Marpe D., George V., Cycon H.L., Barthel K.U., Performance evaluation of Motion-JPEG2000 in comparison with H. 264/AVC operated in pure intracoding mode. Proceedings of SPIE, 5266:129–137, 2003.
Mitchell J.L., Pennebaker W.B., Software implementations of the Qcoder. IBM Journal of research and Development, 32(6):753–774, November 1988.
Ortega A., Optimal bit allocation under multiple rate constraints. In Data Compression Conference, pages 349–358, Snowbird, UT, April 1996.
Ortega A., Ramchandran K., Rate-distortion methods for image and video compression. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 15(6):23–50, November 1998.
Ortega A., Ramchandran K., Vetterli M., Optimal trellis-based buffered compression and fast approximation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 3(l):26–40, January 1994.
Prandolini R., 15444–9:2004 JPEG2000 image coding system -Part 9: Interactivity tools, apis and protocols. Technical Report, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29 WG1, March 2004.
Rabbani M., Joshi R., An overview of the JPEG2000 still image compression standard. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 17(1):3–48, January 2002.
Santa-Cruz D., Grosbois R., Ebrahimi T., JPEG2000 performance evaluation and assessment. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 17(1):113–130, January 2002.
Shoham Y., Gersho A., Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 36(9): 1445–1453, September 1988.
Skodras A., Christopoulos C., Ebrahimi T., The JPEG2000 still image compression standard. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 18(5):36–58, 2001.
Smith M., Villasenor J., Intra-frame JPEG-2000 vs. Inter-frame compression comparison: The benefits and trade-offs for very high quality, high resolution sequences. SMPTE Technical Conference, Pasadena, CA, October 2004.
Symes P., JPEG2000, the Professional compression scheme. Content Technology Magazine, 3(3), June 2006, URL http://svc126.wic003tv.server-web.com/CT-pdf/CT-May-June-2006.pdf.
Taubman D., High performance scalable image compression with ebcot. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(7):1158–1170, July 2000.
Taubman D., Marcellin M.W., JPEG2000: Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards and Practice. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, USA, 2002.
Taubman D., Prandolini R., Architecture, philosophy and performance of JPIP: Internet protocol standard for JPEG2000. In International Symposium on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), Lugano, Switzerland, July 2003.
Taubman D., Rosenbaum R., Rate-distortion optimized interactive browsing of JPEG2000 images. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), September 2003.
Tzannes A., Ebrahimi T., Motion JPEG2000 for medical imaging. ISO/IEC wgln2883, Medical Imaging Ad Hoc Group, 2003.
Wolsey L., Integer Programming. Wiley, New York, 1998.
Zhang D.R., Wang X.X., The manipulation approach of JPEG2000 compressed remote sensing images. Proceedings of SPIE, 6044:315-324, 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Descampe, A., De Vleeschouwer, C., Jacques, L., Marqués, F. (2009). How does digital cinema compress images?. In: Applied Signal Processing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74535-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74535-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74534-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74535-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)