Advertisement

A Methodology for Modeling a Quality Embedded Remanufacturing System

  • Youngseok Kim
  • Hong-Bae Jun
  • Dimitris Kiritsis
  • Paul Xirouchakis
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 246)

Abstract

The uncertain quality of used products highly affects the performances of remanufacturing systems and quality of remanufactured products. Hence the quality issues of used product cannot be neglected in remanufacturing. To apply the quality concept into remanufacturing system control or simulation, individual management of each product is required. To this end, a multi-agent approach can provide good solutions. The first step in applying the quality concept with the multi-agent approach is an effective modeling of a remanufacturing system. This study proposes a methodology for modeling a quality embedded remanufacturing system (QRS) with two layers. The first layer represents elements in a remanufacturing system as it is. The representation also contains the information of a multi-agent structure for a QRS. The second layer expresses the status of each product and resource agent, and their relationships to manage the multi-agent system. As modeling tools to support the proposed methodology, directed graphs and Petri-Nets are used. A case study is introduced to show an application of the proposed methodology.

Keywords

Remanufacturing Modeling methodology Agent Petri-Nets Quality 

References

  1. 1.
    V.D.R. Guide, M.E. Kraus, and R. Srivastava, Scheduling policies for remanufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics 48(2), 187–204 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.M. Shen, Q. Hao, H.J. Yoon, and D.H. Norrie, Applications of Agent-based Systems in Intelligent Manufacturing: An Updated Review, Advanced Engineering Informatics 20(4), 415–431(2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.S.H. Demello, and A.C. Sanderson, And/or graph representation of assembly plans, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 6(2), 188–199 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Zussman, and M.C. Zhou, A methodology for modeling and adaptive planning of disassembly processes, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 15(1), 190–194(1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.Y. ElMekkawy, and H.A. ElMaraghy, Real-time scheduling with deadlock avoidance in flexible manufacturing systems, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 22(3–4), 259–270 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M Jeng, S.L. Xie, and M.Y. Peng, Process nets with resources for manufacturing modeling and their analysis, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(6), 875–889 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    SIMAS II, C1MPACT (2000), available at http://www.cimpact.ch.
  8. 8.
    D. Sakara, Modeling and scheduling of remanufacturing systems, Ph.D. dissertation, STI-IPR-LICP, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youngseok Kim
    • 1
  • Hong-Bae Jun
    • 1
  • Dimitris Kiritsis
    • 1
  • Paul Xirouchakis
    • 1
  1. 1.EPFL, STI-IPR-LICP, ME B1LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations