Skip to main content

The Effect of Familiarity on Mate Choice

  • Conference paper
Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 11

Abstract

The ability to recognize familiar conspecifics appears to be widespread among vertebrates and influences a variety of behavioural interactions including mate selection. Female choice of males has been shown to vary according to male familiarity, but interestingly in some species this favours familiar males, while in others unfamiliar males are preferred. Preference for unfamiliar partners might result from the attempt to minimise inbreeding costs by avoiding mating with individuals encountered during development, or with those sharing relatedness cues. Conspecifics that are familiar through prior mating experience might be avoided in species that benefit from a promiscuous mating system, again resulting in preference for unfamiliar mates. Conversely, familiar mates may be favoured in monogamous species where formation of a pair bond is important for parental investment, and when familiarity provides an opportunity for females to assess the quality and compatibility of potential mates. Thus different types of familiarity may have differing effects on mate choice, with the direction of preference being determined by other aspects of life history, such as the likelihood of inbreeding, the importance of polyandry, and the role of social dominance and territoriality in reproductive success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersson, M. (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S.D. and Hurst, J.L. (2007) Pregnancy block from a female perspective. In: J. Hurst, R. Beynon, C. Roberts, T. Wyatt (Eds.), Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 11. Springer Press, New York, pp. 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beguin, N., Leboucher, G., Bruckert, L. and Kreutzer, M. (2006) Mate preferences in female canaries (Serinus canaria) within a breeding season. Acta Ethologica 9, 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.J., Negus, N.C. and Day, M. (1997) Recognition of kin and avoidance of inbreeding in the montane vole, Microtus montanus. J. Mammal. 78, 1182–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, H.M. (1959) Exteroceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature 184, 105–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheetham, S.A. (2006) Chemical communication in the house mouse: linking biochemistry and behaviour (PhD thesis). Liverpool: University of Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury, D.A. (1982) Dominance rank, copulatory behavior, and differential reproduction. Quart. Rev. Biol. 57, 135–159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eakley, A.L. and Houde, A.E. (2004) Possible role of female discrimination against ‘redundant’ males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, S299–S301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (1995) Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: a cross-species comparison. Ethol. Sociobiol. 16, 257–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H.S., Swaisgood, R.R. and Fitch-Snyder, H. (2003) Countermarking by pygmy lorises (Nycticebus pygmaeus): do females use odor cues to select mates with high competitive ability? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L.M. (1990) Scent-marking by resource holders: alternative mechanisms for advertising the costs of competition. In: D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze, S.E. Natynczuk (Eds.), Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, B. and Thiessen, D.D. (1981) A simple method of olfactory discrimination of urines for the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. Physiol. Behav. 26, 1133–1136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, U.W. and Banks, E.M. (1979) Behavioral components of individual recognition in the collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6, 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K.A., Du, L., Rodd, F.H. and Reznick, D.N. (1999) Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 58, 907–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, F.M., Petrie, M., Otronen, M., Birkhead, T. and Moller, A.P. (1993) Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male? Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J.L. (1990) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty .III. Communication between the sexes. Anim. Behav. 40, 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J.L., Beynon, R.J., Humphries, R.E., Malone, N., Nevison, C.M., Payne, C.E., Robertson, D.H.L. and Veggerby, C. (2001) Information in scent signals of status: the interface between behaviour and chemistry. In: A. Marchlewska-Koj, D. Muller-Schwarze, J. Lepri (Eds.), Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M.D. and Petrie, M. (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75, 21–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E., Chiang, G. and Tung, C. (1994) The information in scent over-marks of golden hamsters. Anim. Behav. 48, 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E. and Rasmussen, K. (1984) Individual recognition of female hamsters by males–role of chemical cues and of the olfactory and vomeronasal systems. Physiol. Behav. 33, 95–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E., Sorokin, E.S. and Ferkin, M.H. (1997a) Female voles discriminate males’ over-marks and prefer top-scent males. Anim. Behav. 54, 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E., Sorokin, E.S. and Ferkin, M.H. (1997b) Scent counter-marking by male meadow voles: females prefer the top-scent male. Ethology 103, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W.C. and Bruford, M.W. (1998) New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity 81, 239–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaba, H., Rosser, A. and Keverne, B. (1989) Neural basis of olfactory memory in the context of pregnancy block. Neuroscience 32, 657–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavaliers, M., Colwell, D.D., Braun, W.J. and Choleris, E. (2003) Brief exposure to the odour of a parasitized male alters the subsequent mate odour responses of female mice. Anim. Behav. 65, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J.L., Graves, J.A. and Magurran, A.E. (1999) Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 401, 661–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruczek, M. (2007) Recognition of kin in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Physiol. Behav. 90, 483–489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruczek, M. and Golas, A. (2003) Behavioural development of conspecific odour preferences in bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Behav. Process. 64, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lens, L., VanDongen, S., VandenBroeck, M., VanBroeckhoven, C. and Dhondt, A.A. (1997) Why female crested tits copulate repeatedly with the same partner: evidence for the mate assessment hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 8, 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, B.S., Hicks, B.G., Johnson, L.S. and Erb, L.A. (2003) Genotype and extra-pair paternity in the house wren: a rare-male effect? Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 1393–1397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo, J.M. (2004) Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 41, 729–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K.S. and Halpin, Z.T. (1988) Individual odours and mate recognition in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Anim. Behav. 36, 1779–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, M. and Shine, R. (1998) Chemosensory mate recognition may facilitate prolonged mate guarding by male snow skinks, Niveoscincus microlepidotus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43, 359–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, A.S. and Bruce, H.M. (1961) Olfactory stimuli in mammalian reproduction. Science 134, 1049–1054.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patris, B. and Baudoin, C. (1998) Female sexual preferences differ in Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus domesticus: the role of familiarization and sexual experience. Anim. Behav. 56, 1465–1470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D.J. and Potts, W.K. (1998) MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 1299–1306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R.H. (1988) The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: superfamily Muroidea. Behav. Genet. 18, 483–494.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reby, D., Hewison, M., Izquierdo, M. and Pepin, D. (2001) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) hinds discriminate between the roars of their current harem-holder stag and those of neighbouring stags. Ethology 107, 951–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricankova, V., Sumbera, R. and Sedlacek, F. (2007) Familiarity and partner preferences in female common voles, Microtus arvalis. J. Ethol. 25, 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, T.J. and Hurst, J.L. (1998) Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates. Anim. Behav. 56, 727–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, T.J. and Hurst, J.L. (1999) The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates. Anim. Behav. 58, 1027–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L.E., Austin, D., Ward, S.E. and Dewsbury, D.A. (1986) Familiarity and female mate choic ein two species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus). Anim. Behav. 34, 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold, T., Johnsen, A., Lampe, H.M. and Lifjeld, J.T. (2001) Do female pied flycatchers seek extrapair copulations with familiar males? A test of the incomplete knowledge hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 12, 412–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale, L., Pedersen, J.M., Block, M.L. and Zucker, I. (1990) Investigation of conspecific male odours by female prairie voles. Anim. Behav. 39, 768–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, N.G. and Rumbaugh, T. (1997) Odor preferences of weanling and mature male and female pine voles. J. Chem. Ecol. 23, 2133–2143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang-Martinez, Z. (2001) The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation. Behav. Proc. 53, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang-Martinez, Z., Mueller, L.L. and Taylor, G.T. (1993) Individual odours and mating success in the golden hamster, Misocricetus auratus. Anim. Behav. 45, 1141–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, M.D. and Hurst, J.L. (2004) Individual recognition by scent. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 41, 765–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, M.D., Stockley, P., Beynon, R.J. and Hurst, J.L. (2007) Scent, mate choice and genetic heterozygosity. In: J. Hurst, R. Beynon, C. Roberts, T. Wyatt (Eds.), Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 11. Springer Press, New York, pp. 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K.J. and Dominic, C.J. (1987) Evaluation of the role of the stud male in preventing male-induced implantation failure (the Bruce effect) in laboratory mice. Anim. Behav. 35, 1257–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokarz, R.R. (2006) Importance of prior physical contact with familiar females in the development of a male courtship and mating preference for unfamiliar females in the lizard Anolis sagrei. Herpetologica 62, 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C.J., Wilhelm, S.I., Cameron-Macmillan, M.L. and Storey, A.E. (2006) Extra-pair copulations in common murres I: a mate attraction strategy? Behaviour 143, 1241–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, N., Gage, M.J.G. and Parker, G.A. (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.R., Kuehn, R.E. and Beach, F.A. (1963) Modification in the sexual behavior of male rats produced by changing the stimulus female. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 56, 636–644.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B.B.M. and Candolin, U. (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol. Rev. 80, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G.K., Kupniewski, D., Bard, J., Thomas, L. and Boyse, E.A. (1988) Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science 240, 1331–1332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zajitschek, S.R.K., Evans, J.P. and Brooks, R. (2006) Independent effects of familiarity and mating preferences for ornamental traits on mating decisions in guppies. Behav. Ecol. 17, 911–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, J.A., Newcomer, S.D. and Zeh, D.W. (1998) Polyandrous females discriminate against previous mates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13732–13736.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media,LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheetham, S.A., Thom, M.D., Beynon, R.J., Hurst, J.L. (2008). The Effect of Familiarity on Mate Choice. In: Hurst, J.L., Beynon, R.J., Roberts, S.C., Wyatt, T.D. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73945-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics