In the family of ophthalmology subspecialties, ophthalmic plastic surgery is the adopted child. There are probably more differences than there are similarities with the other subspecialties. The diseases that oculoplastic surgeons treat are unique, and the surgeries they perform are quite different from those of ophthalmology colleagues. These unique attributes of ophthalmic plastic surgery warrant special consideration in the study of ophthalmology and the law.
From a legal perspective, the practice of oculoplastic surgery has risks similar to those of other ophthalmology subspecialties, but perhaps most unique is the high visibility nature of the operations. The eye–periocular complex is arguably the most significant aesthetic feature of the entire body, and thus problems in oculoplastic surgery are highly visible to the patient. Problems in this area also fall under the scrutiny of all the patients’ family members and friends. Thus, there is a complex set of interactions between the patients’ emotions regarding their appearance and their functional oculoplastic problems. This emotion and high visibility are present not only with elective cosmetic procedures but also with reconstructive and functional surgeries, as well as medical treatments.
This chapter should serve as a guide for physicians and is not designed to delineate the standard of care in ophthalmic plastic surgery. We practice in a unique academic and university environment. Our approach is not necessarily representative of the community at large and should not be construed as the standard in the community
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brooten KE. Malpractice: A Guide to Avoidance and Treatment. 1987. Orlando: Grune & Stratton; 1987.
Alton WG. Malpractice: A Trial Lawyer’s Advice for Physicians (How to Avoid, How to Win). Boston: Little, Brown; 1977.
Kraushar MF, Robb JH. Ophthalmic malpractice lawsuits with large monetary awards. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114(3):333-337.
Lobe TE. Medical Malpractice, A Physician’s Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995.
Shorr N, Seiff SR. The four stages of surgical rehabilitation of the patient with dysthyroid ophthalmopathy. Ophthalmology 1986;93(4):476-483.
Bettman, JW. Ophthalmology: The Art, The Law, and a Bit of Science. Birmingham, AL: Aesculapius; 1977.
Ando K, Oohira A, Takao M. Restrictive strabismus after retrobulbar anesthesia. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1997;41(1):23-26.
Sarwer DB, Pruzinsky T, Cash TF, Goldwyn RM, Persing JA, Whitaker LA. Psychological Aspects of Reconstructive and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
Campion FX. Grand Rounds on Medical Malpractice. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1990.
Kraushar MF. Medical malpractice experiences of vitreoretinal specialists: risk prevention strategies. Retina 2003;23(4):523-529.
Kraushar MF. Recognizing and managing the litigious patient. Surv Ophthalmol 1992;37(1):54-56.
Kraushar MF, Turner MF. Medical malpractice litigation in cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105(10):1339-1343.
Leaman TL, Saxton JW. Preventing Malpractice: The Co-Active Solution. New York: Plenum Medical Book Co.; 1993.
MacKauf SE. Advanced Medical Malpractice: Anesthesiology, General Surgery, and Neurology. New York: Practicing Law Institute; 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nakra, T., Shorr, N. (2008). Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery. In: Kraushar, M.F. (eds) Risk Prevention in Ophthalmology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73341-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73341-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73340-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-73341-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)