Abstract
We analyzed the relationships between comprehension skill and search strategies in instructional text. In two experiments, college-level readers were asked to search a computer-presented science text in order to answer different types of questions. High level questions required the integration of information across paragraphs, whereas low level questions requested the localization of information within a single paragraph. High level questions were re-read more often and they resulted in broader text search patterns. Furthermore, students who were diagnosed as good comprehenders located relevant sections of the text faster and spent more time on those sections. Poor comprehenders, on the other hand, showed more “erratic” search patterns, spending more time on irrelevant portions of the materials. The results support the view that skilled comprehension involves the ability to allocate various levels of attention to different portions of the text, depending on contextual constraints.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher level questions while reading facilitate productive reading? Review of Educational Research, 49, 280–318.
Brandsford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). New York: Academic.
Cataldo, M. G., & Oakhill, J. (2000). Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 791–799.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. -H., & LaVancher, Ch. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Larkin, K. M. (1980). Inference in text understanding. In R. J. Sprio, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 385–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cote, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1–53.
Goldman, S. R. (1985). Inferential reasoning in and about narrative texts. In A. Graesser & J. Black (Eds.), The psychology of questions (pp. 247–276).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldman, S. R., & Durán, R. P. (1988). Answering questions from Oceanography Texts: Learner, Task and Text Characteristics. Discourse Processes, 11, 373–412.
Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1990b). Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 181–219.
Graesser, A. C., & Franklin, S. P. (1990). QUEST: A model of question answering. Discourse Processes, 13, 279–303.
Graesser, A. C., Lang, K. L., & Roberts, R. M. (1991). Question answering in the context of stories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 120 (3), 254–277.
Guthrie, J. T., & Kirsch, I. (1987). Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 220–227.
Halpain, D. R., Glover, J. A., & Harvey, A. L. (1985). Differential effects of higher and lower order questions: Attention hypotheses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–715.
Hamilton, R. J. (1985). A framework for the evaluation of the effectiveness of adjunct questions and objectives. Review of Educational Research, 55, 47–85.
Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1976). Preinstructional strategies: The role of pretests, behavioral objectives, overviews and advance organizers. Review of Educational Research, 46, 239–265.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press,.
Kirsch, I., & Guthrie, J. T. (1984). Adult reading practices for work and leisure. Adult Education Quarterly, 34, 213–232.
Langer, J. A. (1985). Levels of questioning: An alternative view. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 586–602.
Lazonder , A. W., & Rouet , J. -F. (2008). Information problem solving instruction: some cognitive and metacognitive issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 753–765.
MacLatchy-Gaudet , H., & Symons , S. (1999). The role of reading comprehension in text search. Unpublished manuscript.
Raphael,T. E., Winograd, P., & Pearson, P. D. (1980). Strategies children use when answering questions. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives on reading research and instruction. Washington, D.C: National Reading Conference.
Rickards, J. P. (1979). Adjunct postquestions in text: A critical review of methods and processes. Review of Educational Research, 49, 181–196.
Rouet, J. -F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Bert-Erboul, A., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of information search tasks on the comprehension of instructional text. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 163–186.
Rouet, J -F., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2002). “Mining for meaning”: a cognitive examination of inserted questions in learning from scientific text. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The Psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 417–436). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rouet, J. -F., & Tricot, A. (1998). Chercher de l'information dans un hypertext: vers un modèle des processus cognitifs. In A. Tricot & J. -F. Rouet (Dir.) Les hypermedias: approches cognitives et ergonomiques (pp. 57–74). Paris: Hermès.
Symons, S., & Specht, J. A. (1994). Including both time and accuracy in defining text search efficiency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 267–276.
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Lui, L. (1988). A model for generating questions that assess and promote comprehension. Questioning Exchange, 2, 25–38.
Trabasso, T., Suh, S., Payton, P., & Jain, R. (1995). Explanatory inferences and other strategies during comprehension: Encoding effects on recall. In R. Lorch & E. Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 219–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. (1996b). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them ? In M. Craves, P. Van den Broek, Van den Broek & B. M. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child’s right to read (pp. 158–181). New York: Teachers College Press.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vidal-Abarca , E., Gilabert , R., & Rouet , J. -F. (1998). El papel del tipo de preguntas en el aprendizaje de textos cientificos [The role of question type on learning from scientific text.] Seminario “Comprension y produccion de textos cientificos” [Meeting on Comprehension and production of scientific texts]. Aveiro (Portugal), July 8–10, 1998.
Vidal-Abarca, E., Mengual, V., Sanjose, V., & Rouet, J. -F. (1996). Levels of comprehension of scientific prose: The role of text and task variables. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Using Complex Information Systems. Poitiers, France, September 4–6.
Whilite, S. C. (1985). Differential effects of high-level and low-level postpassage questions. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 41–58.
Wixson, K. K. (1983). Postreading question-answer interactions and children's learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 413– 423.
Wonnacott, C. A., & Raphael, T. E. (1982). Comprehension monitoring: An investigation of children’s question-answering strategies. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Clearwater, Florida.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cerdán, R., Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., Gilabert, R., Gil, L., Rouet, JF. (2008). Search and Comprehension Processes in Learning from Text. In: Rouet, JF., Lowe, R., Schnotz, W. (eds) Understanding Multimedia Documents. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73337-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73337-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73336-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-73337-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)