Skip to main content

Managing Wildlife Damage to Agriculture in Bhutan: Conflicts, Costs and Compromise

  • Chapter
Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 31))

Abstract

Conflicts between wildlife and agricultural producers are a dominant problem in Bhutan, with policy debates focusing increasingly on whether most of the conservation costs are borne directly by the small producers and rural poor through crop losses and labor time diverted to guarding crops and livestock. This chapter attempts to quantify the extent of wildlife damage to crops and to livestock in Bhutan. While several important studies document in detail wildlife damage to agriculture in and near protected areas in Bhutan, this chapter aims to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the extent of the problem around the country, presenting the results of a survey of 526 households and outlining the extent of wildlife damage to their crops during a 12-month period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 But the sample was limited: 990 urban households and 2,300 rural households. In descending order the reasons were: Lack of education facilities (46%), lack of employment or job search (17%), inadequate service facilities (15%), small holdings (7%), drudgery of farm work (5%), labor contributions (3%), and crop damage (3%).

References

  • Bulte EH, Rondeau R (2007) Wildlife damage and agriculture: A dynamic analysis of compensation schemes. Am J Agric Econ 89:490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso de Mendoça MJ, Sachisida A, Loureiro PRA (2003) A study on the valuing of biodiversity: The case of three endangered species in Brazil. Ecol Econ 46(1):9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choden D, Namgay K (1996) Report on the findings and recommendations of the wild boar survey. Unpublished report. National Plant Protection Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Royal Government of Bhutan, Thimphu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro PJ (2001) Global habitat protection: Limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments. Conserv Biol 15:990–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann J, Peterson L (2004) Marketing environmental services: Lessons learned in German development cooperation. Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2004) Bhutan poverty reduction strategy paper. IMF Country Report No. 04/246. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins M, Scherr S, Inbar M (2004) Markets for biodiversity services. Environment 46(6):32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch JL (1994) Environmental valuation: Some problems of wrong questions and misleading answers. Environ Values 3(4):351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontoleon A, Swanson T (2003) Property rights for the Great Panda. Land Econ 79:483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhusan MD, Karanth KU (2000) Hunting for an answer: Is local hunting compatible with wildlife conservation? In Robinson JG, Bennett, EL (eds.) Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBS (National Bureau of Statistics) (2007) Bhutan living standard survey (BLSS). National Statistic Bureau, Thimphu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmani SR, Bajracharya BB, Tenzing S, Wangyal T (2007) Macroeconomics of poverty reduction: The case study of Bhutan. UN Development Programme, New York, Thimphu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagoila, S (2003) Can programs of payments for environmental services help preserve wildlife? Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Workshop on Economic Incentives and Trade Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston L (1997) Investing in mountains: A participatory electronic conference of the mountain forum. Mt Res Dev 17(2):182–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondeau D, Bulte EH (2007) Compensation for wildlife damage: Habitat conversion, species preservation and local welfare. J Environ Econ Manag 54(3):311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangay T (2005) Tiger conservation program, species conservation research and monitoring. Section Nature Conservation Division, Department of Forests, Thimphu, Bhutan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson T, Kontoleon A (2003) Conflicts in wildlife conservation: Aggregating total economic values. Department of Economics, UCL. Paper presented at 4th BIOECON workshop on the Economics and Biodiversity Conservation, Venice, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobgay S (2005) Small farmers and the food system in Bhutan. Agricultural Marketing Services Ministry of Agriculture, Royal Government of Bhutan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SW, Mcdonald DW (2006) Livestock predation by carnivores in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Biol Conserv 129(4):558–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SW, Curtis PD, Lassoie JP (2006a) Farmer perceptions of crop damage by wildlife in the Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Wildl Soc Bull 34(2):359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SW, Lassoie J, Curtis PD (2006b) Farmer attitudes towards conservation in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Environ Conserv 3(2):148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) Bhutan land management project. World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S (2005) Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman D, Lipper L, McCarthy N (2008) When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor? Environ Dev Econ 13:255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization and the Roles of Agriculture Project for funding support. The authors are very grateful to Karma Kesang, Raghavan Sampath, and Ryan Slunaker for research assistance, survey support, and data analysis. We wish to dedicate this chapter to the late Karma Kesang who died in a tragic river accident while completing the survey. He and his wife collected the data throughout Bhutan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 FAO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ura, K., Stringer, R., Bulte, E. (2009). Managing Wildlife Damage to Agriculture in Bhutan: Conflicts, Costs and Compromise . In: Lipper, L., Sakuyama, T., Stringer, R., Zilberman, D. (eds) Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 31. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72971-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics