Advertisement

Domain-Specific Metadata for Model Validation and Performance Optimisation

  • Jeyarajan Thiyagalingam
  • Vladimir Getov
  • Sofia Panagiotidi
  • Olav Beckmann
  • John Darlington

Abstract

Interactive problem solving environments are gaining widespread acceptance within the Grid community. While developing applications and frameworks to support and to integrate with these interactive environments is very important, it is also necessary to treat the legacy applications with the same importance. In this paper, we report an ongoing effort in enabling a legacy application to support, integrate with, and evolve as a scalable problem solving environment for Earth system modelling. Our strategy has been to componentise the existing legacy framework, augment each component with metadata, and using this metadata address different issues arising when performing component composition. We describe the means for specifying, publishing, and using the metadata in solving two different but crucially important issues when performing component composition – model validation and model efficiency.

Keywords

components composition performance metadata specialisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Grid ENabled Integrated Earth system model (GENIE). http://www.genie.ac.ukGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Parallel Grid Runtime and Application Development Environment (PGRADE). http://www.lpds.sztaki.hu/pgrade/Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D.M. Beazley and P.S. Lomdahl. Controlling the Data Glut in Large-scale Molecular-dynamics Simulations. Comput. Phys., 11(3):230–238, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    O. Beckmann, A.J. Field, G. Gorman, A. Huff, M. Hull, and P.H.J. Kelly. Overcoming Barriers to Restructuring in a Modular Visualisation Environment. In Proc. 7th Workshop on Languages, Compilers, and Run-time Support for Scalable Systems (LCR’04), pages 1–7, ACM Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S.H. Edwards. Toward Reflective Metadata Wrappers for Formally Specified Software Components. In Proc. Workshop on Specification and Verification of Component Based Systems at OOPSLA’01, 2001. http://people.cs.vt.edu/edwards/downloads/Edwards-SAVCBS01.pdfGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Flanagan and B. McLaughlin. Java 1.5 Tiger: A Developer’s Notebook. O’ Reilly & Associates, Inc. 2004.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    I. Foster. Globus Toolkit Version 4: Software for Service-Oriented Systems. In Proc. IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3779:2–13, Springer, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Freire, C.T. Silva, S.P. Callahan, E. Santos, C.E. Scheidegger, and H.T. Vo. Managing Rapidly-Evolving Scientific Workflows. In Proc. 2006 International Provenance and Annotation Workshop, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4145:10–18, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    N. Furmento, A. Mayer, S. McGough, S. Newhouse, T. Field, and J. Darlington. Optimisation of Component-based Applications Within a Grid Environment. In Proc. ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing’01 (CDROM), pages 30–30, ACM Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P.H.J. Kelly, O. Beckmann, T. Field, and S.B. Baden. THEMIS: Component Dependence Metadata in Adaptive Parallel Applications. Parallel Processing Letters, 11(4):455–470, December 2001.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Lidin. Inside Microsoft .NET IL Assembler. Microsoft Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Orso, M.J. Harrold, and D.S. Rosenblum. Component Metadata for Software Engineering Tasks. In W. Emmerich and S. Tai (Eds.), EDO, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1999:129–144, Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Panagiotidi, J. Cohen, J. Darlington, M. Krznarić, and E. Katsiri. Service-enabling Legacy Applications for the GENIE Project. In Proc. All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, September 2006.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M.K. Bane, C.W. Armstrong, R.W. Ford, G.D. Riley, and T.L. Freeman. GCF: A General Coupling Framework. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18(2):163–181, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Vogelsang, D. Declat, H. Ritzdorf, S. Valcke, R. Redler, and T. Schoenemeyer. OASIS4 User’s Guide. PRISM Report, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. Thain, T. Tannenbaum, and M. Livny. Condor and the GRID. In F. Berman, G. Fox, and T. Hey (Eds.), Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2002.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. Thiyagalingm and V. Getov. A Metadata Extracting Tool for Software Components in Grid Applications. In Proc. IEEE John Vincent Atanasoft International Symposium on Modern Computing, pages 189–196, IEEE CS Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Vallée-Rai, L. Hendren, V. Sundaresan, P. Lam, E. Gagnon, and P. Co. Soot - A Java Optimization Framework. In Proc. CASCON 1999, pages 125–135, IBM, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeyarajan Thiyagalingam
    • 1
  • Vladimir Getov
    • 1
  • Sofia Panagiotidi
    • 2
  • Olav Beckmann
    • 2
  • John Darlington
    • 2
  1. 1.Harrow School of Computer ScienceUniversity of WestminsterNorthwick ParkUK
  2. 2.Department of ComputingImperial College London180 Queen’s GateUK

Personalised recommendations