Abstract
We build on previous research to demonstrate how, with a combination of a socio-technical change model, a social process model, and punctuated equilibrium theory, we can describe and analyze a specific information system development project. In this paper, we focus on an information systems project that was being implemented in a UK retail organization where a new system was being implemented to replace the existing, failing one. Generally, the combination of these IS research models can provide us with a new, practical, and valuable way of understanding information systems development (ISD) as a social process. Despite the limitations associated with this type of research, this study attempts to contribute to the further understanding of process research into ISD.
Through our case study exemplar, several findings were generated. First of all, the project implementation context, including organizational context and external environmental context, was shown to play a significant role in the project implementation process. We show how social-technical equilibria can be perturbed by the critical incidents that occurred externally to the project. Furthermore, the ability of the project team in dealing with unexpected events was seen as a vital skill in ensuring the stability of a project. In contrast, drift is shown to lead to a degree of chaos. Third, the past project patterns or similar patterns from other system processes, as suggested the literature, have significant impacts on current project patterns. Finally, when it comes to critical events that occur totally unexpectedly, we found that the knowledge generated from past project patterns or similar patterns from other systems may be of only limited use. Actors in our ISD drama were often reactive, not anticipatory.
Our approach illustrates the utility of the contextual process model in the study of ISD and, in particular, the distinction between project and work processes. The paper ends with suggestions which may be helpful to scholars in IS research as well as practitioners involved in IS projects.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
BBC News. “NHS IT Upgrade Set for Criticism,” June 15, 2006 (available online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5084596.stm).
Beynon-Davies, P. “Human Error and Information Systems Failure: the Case of the London Ambulance Service Computer-Aided Despatch System Project,” Interacting with Computers (11:6), 1999, pp. 699–720.
Burke, R., Kenney, B., Kott, K., and Pflueger, K. “Success or Failure: Human Factors in Implementing New Systems,” unpublished paper, 1998 (available online at http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EDU0152.pdf).
DeAbreu, A. F., and Conrath, D. W. “The Role of Stakeholders Expectations in Predicting Information Systems Implementation Outcomes,” in M. R. Tanniru (ed.), Proceedings of the 1993 Conference on Computer Personnel Research, St. Louis, MO, April 1–3, 1993, pp. 408–415.
DeWit, A. “Measurement of Project Success,” International Journal of Project Management (6:3), August 1998, pp. 164–170.
Eglizeau, C., Frey, O., and Newman, M. “SOCRATE: An Implementation Debacle,” in J. Dias Coelho (ed.), Proceedings of the 4 th European Conference on Information Systems, Lisbon, Portugal, July 2–4, 1986, pp. 1233–1244.
Gersick, C. J. G. “Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm,” Academy of Management Review (16:1), 1991, pp. 10–36.
Kanter, J., and Walsh, J. J. “Toward More Successful Project Management,” Information Systems Management (21:2), 2004, pp. 16–21.
Keil, M., and Robey, D. “Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the De-escalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action,” Journal of Management Information Systems (15:4), 1999, pp. 63–87.
Klein, H., and Myers, M. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (23:1), 1999, pp. 67–94.
Kwon, T. H., and Zmud, R. W. “Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information System Implementation,” in R. J. Boland Jr. and R. Hirschheim (eds), Critical Issues in IS Research, Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1987, pp. 227–251.
Langley, A. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data,” Academy of Management Review (24:4), 1999, pp. 691–710.
Leavitt, H. J. Managerial Psychology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
Lyytinen, K. “Different Perspectives on Information Systems: Problems and Solutions,” A CM Computing Surveys (19:1), 1987, pp. 5–44.
Lyytinen, K., and Newman, M. “Punctuated Equilibrium, Process Models and Information System Evolution: Towards a Socio-Technical Deep Structure of Information System Evolution,” Unpublished Working Paper, Division of Accounting and Finance, University of Manchester, 2004.
Markus, L., and Robey, D. “The Organizational Validity of Management Information Systems,” Human Relations (36:3), 1983, pp. 203–226.
Mitev, N. N. “More Than a Failure? The Computerized Reservation Systems at French Railways,” Information Technology & People (9:4), 1996, pp. 8–19.
Myers, M., and Newman, M. “The Qualitative Interview in IS Research: Examining the Craft,” Information and Organization (17), 2007, pp. 2–26.
Newman, M., and Robey, D. “A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), June 1992, pp. 249–266.
Newman, M., and Zhu, S. “A Contextualised Socio-Technical Process Approach to ISD,” in K. Soliman (ed.), Information Management in Modern Enterprises: Issues and Solutions, International Business Information Management Association, Lisbon, Portugal, July 5–7, 2005.
Pan, S. L., Pan, G., Newman, M., and Flynn, D. “Escalation and De-escalation of Commitment to Information Systems Projects: Insights from a Post-Implementation Evaluation Model,” European Journal of Operations Research (173:3), September 2006, pp. 1139–1160.
Pentland, B. “Building Process Theory with Narrative: From Description to Explanation,” Academy of Management Review (24:4), 1999, pp. 711–724.
Pettigrew, A. “The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research,” Strategic Management Journal (13), 1992, pp. 5–16.
Pettigrew, A. “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice,” Organization Science (1:3), 1990, pp. 267–292.
Poon, P., and Wagner, C. “Critical Success Factors Revisited: Success and Failure Cases of Information Systems for Senior Executives,” Decision Support Systems (30:4), 2001, pp. 393–418.
Robey, D., and Newman, M. “Sequential Patterns in Information Systems Development: An Application of a Social Process Model, A CM Transactions on Information Systems (14:1), January 1996, pp. 30–63.
Somers, T. M., and Nelson, K. “The Impact of Critical Success Factors Across the Stages of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation,” in Proceedings of the 34 th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Aalmitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001.
Tushman, M. L., and Anderson, P. “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments,” Administrative Science Quarterly (31:3), 1996, pp. 439–465.
Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R., and Umble, M. M. “Enterprise Resource Planning: Implementation Procedures and Critical Success Factors,” European Journal of Operational Research (146:2), 2003, pp. 241–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Newman, M., Zhu, S. (2007). Process Modeling Information Systems Development. In: McMaster, T., Wastell, D., Ferneley, E., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda. TDIT 2007. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 235. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72803-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72804-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)