Alloy and Composite Generation in a Semisolid State

  • Frank Czerwinski

Although the conventional alloys are formed mainly in a molten phase, the ideas of incomplete melting were attempted in the past. A technique based on particulate precursors with different melting points and described as semisolid forming of elementally blended powders, was applied in the 1970s to the Ti-Al system [1]. Similarly, Al and Al-30%Mg powders were partially melted to create a family of Al—Mg alloys [2]. In contrast to the homogeneous mixing of precursors during complete melting, partial melting selectively distributes alloying elements and phases derived from each precursor between the matrix and the unmelted component. As a result, the properties of created alloys vary in a more complex way than those anticipated from a simple rule of mixtures. The separate control of the chemical composition of a liquid matrix and primary solid phase creates an opportunity for building unique structures required for specific properties. Thus, combining two or more thixotropic slurries would allow the creation of new alloys, essentially different from those obtained after the complete melting of metallic ingredients. The experiments with several magnesium alloys show that the control of chemistry and the proportion of precursors, as well as the solid to liquid ratio during their partial melting, allow the selective partition of alloying elements between the solid and liquid phases, thus designing unique solidification microstructures.


Magnesium Alloy Partial Melting Solid Content Metallic Glass Injection Molding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Young, RMK, Clyne TW (1986) Jourmal of Materials Science 21:1025Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yasue K et al (2003) Journal of Materials Science 38:3591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jining Q et al (2006) Mechanical behaviour of a hybrid reinforced magnesium composite fabricated by pressure infiltration method. Key Engineering Materials 313:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mayencourt C, Schaller R (1999) A high damping magnesium matrix to limit fatigue in composite. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 18(18):1677–1688Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu YK et al (2005) Mg-based metallic glass composites with plasticity and gigapascal strength. Acta Materialia 53:1857–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta M, Hassan SF (2005) Development of high performance magnesium nano-composites using nano-Al2O3 as reinforcement. Materials Science and Engineering A 392:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y L, Langdon TG (1999) Creep behaviour of an AZ91 magnesium alloy reinforced with alumina fibers. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 30:1999–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu F, Zhu J (1997) Morphology of second-phase precipitates in carbon-fiber and graphite-fiber reinforced magnesium based matel-matrix composites. Composites Science and Tecchnology 57:661–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Contreras A, Lopez VH, Bedolla E (2004) Mg/TiC composites manufactured by pressureless melt infiltration. Scripta Materialia 51(3):249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang QC et al (2004) Effect of TiB2 particulate on partial remelting behaviour of Mg-11Al-0.5Zn matrix composite. Materials Science and Engineering A 381(1–2):223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ho KF, Gupta M, Srivatsan TS (2004) The mechanical behaviour of magnesium alloy AZ91D reinforced with fine copper particulates. Materials Science and Engineering A 369(1–2):302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ye HZ, Liu XY (2004) Review of recent studies in magnesium matrix composites. Journal of Materials Science 39:6153–6171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fan Z, Ji S, Zhang J (2001) Processing of immiscible metallic alloys by rheomixing process. Materials Science and Technology 17:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Czerwinski F (2004) The concept and technology of alloy formation during semisolid injection molding. In Magnesium Technologies SP-1947, SAE International, Warrendale, Pa, USA, pp 45–49Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Czerwinski F (2005) A novel method of alloy creation by mixing thixotropic slurries. Materials Science and Engineering A 404(1–2):19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Czerwinski F (2004) The generation of Mg–Al–Zn alloys by semsolid state mixing of particulate precursors. Acta Materialia 52(17):5057–5069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brooks CR (1982) Heat Treatment, Structure and Properties of Non-ferrous Alloys. ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mortensen A, Cornie JA, Flemings MC (1988) Solidification processing of metal-matrix composites. Journal of Metals 12 Feb. 1988Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Czerwinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Development EngineeringHusky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.Bolton, OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations