Abstract
Semidefinite programming (SDP) is a branch of convex programming (CP) that has been a subject of intensive research since the early 1990’s [1]–[9]. The continued interest in SDP has been motivated mainly by two reasons. First, many important classes of optimization problems such as linear-programming (LP) and convex quadratic-programming (QP) problems can be viewed as SDP problems, and many CP problems of practical usefulness that are neither LP nor QP problems can also be formulated as SDP problems. Second, several interior-point methods that have proven efficient for LP and convex QP problems have been extended to SDP in recent years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
F. Alizadeh, Combinational Optimization with Interior Point Methods and Semidefinite Matrices, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, Oct. 1991.
Y. Nesterov and A. Nemirovski, Interior-Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
L. Vandenberghe and S. Boyd, “Semidefinite programming,” SIAM Review, vol. 38, pp. 49–95, Mar. 1996.
A. Nemirovski and P. Gahinet, “The projective method for solving linear matrix inequalities,” in Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 840–844, Baltimore, MD., June 1994.
C. Helmberg, F. Rendl, R. Vanderbei, and H. Wolkowicz, “An interior-point method for semidefinite programming,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 6, pp. 342–361, 1996.
M. Kojima, S. Shindoh, and S. Hara, “Interior-point methods for the monotone linear complementarity problem in symmetric matrices,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 7, pp. 86–125, 1997.
Y. Nesterov and M. Todd, “Primal-dual interior-point method for self-scaled cones,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 8, pp. 324–364, 1998.
F. Alizadeh, J. A. Haeberly, and M. L. Overton, “Primal-dual interior-point methods for semidefinite programming: Convergence rates, stability and numerical results,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 8, pp. 746–768, 1998.
R. Monteiro, “Polynomial convergence of primal-dual algorithm for semidefinite programming based on Monteiro and Zhang family of directions,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 8, pp. 797–812, 1998.
S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.
A. S. Lewis and M. L. Overton, “Eigenvalue optimization,” Acta Numerica, vol. 5, pp. 149–190, 1996.
M. Shida, S. Shindoh, and M. Kojima, “Existence and uniqueness of search directions in interior-point algorithms for the SDP and the monotone SDLCP,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 8, pp. 387–398, 1998.
S. Mehrotra, “On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point method,” SIAM, J. Optim., vol. 2, pp. 575–601, 1992.
P. Gahinet and A. Nemirovski, “The projective method for solving linear matrix inequalities,” Math. Programming, vol. 77, pp. 163–190, 1997.
M. S. Lobo, L. Vandenberghe, S. Boyd, and H. Lebret, “Applications of second-order cone programming,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 284, pp. 193–228, Nov. 1998.
R. D. C. Monteiro and T. Tsuchiya, “Polynomial convergence of primal-dual algorithms for the second-order cone program based on the MZ-family of directions,” Math. Programming, vol. 88, pp. 61–83, 2000.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Semidefinite and Second-Order Cone Programming. In: Practical Optimization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71107-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71107-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71106-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71107-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)