Skip to main content

Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning: The Teacher's Role

  • Chapter

Part of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning book series (CULS,volume 8)

Teachers who wish to use cooperative learning effectively will wish to base their classroom practices on theory validated by research. To do so, they must first understand the nature of social interdependence (that is, cooperative, competitive, and individualistic efforts). Second, teachers need to understand that social interdependence theory is validated by hundreds of research studies indicating that cooperation, compared to competitive and individualistic efforts, tends to result in greater achievement, more positive relationships, and greater psychological health. Third, teachers need to understand the five basic elements that make cooperation work: positive interdependence, individual accountability, promotive interaction, appropriate use of social skills, and group processing. Finally, teachers need to understand the flexibility and many faces of cooperative learning, such as formal cooperative learning, informal cooperative learning, and cooperative base groups.

Keywords

  • Social Skill
  • Group Processing
  • Cooperative Learning
  • Social Dilemma
  • Negative Interdependence

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archer-Kath, J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1994). Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 681–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1954). Co-operation and competition in a bureaucracy. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 530–535.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., & Kramer, R. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J., & Haaland, G. (1972). Predecisional information seeking and subsequent conformity in the social influence process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 112–119.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crombag, H. (1966). Cooperation and competition in means interdependent triads: A replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 692–695.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., & Van Kijk, E. (in press). Reactions to group success and failure as a function of group identification: A test of the goal transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., & Van Vjugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871–893.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949a). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949b). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 199–231.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1960). The effects of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13, 123–139.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275–319). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. (1984). A comparison between an individual and group goal structure contingency that differed in the behavioral contingency and performance-outcome components. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbert, B., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1986). Cooperative learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. Journal of Psychology, 120(3), 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, H., Wilhelmy, R., & Conolley, E. (1965). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 79–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, D., & McKeachie, W. (1967). Cooperative versus competitive discussion methods in teaching introductory psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(6), 386–390.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, S., & Petty, R. (1982). The effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214–1229.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S., Ward, T., Hannafin, M., & Clark, H. (1989). The effects of aptitude composition on achievement during small group learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwong, N., Caswell, A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1993). Effects of cooperative and individualistic on prospective elementary teachers’ music achievements and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 133(1), 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indik, B. P. (1965). Organization size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternate explanations. Human Relations, 15, 339–350.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, A., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (1970). The social psychology of education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (1974). Communication and the inducement of cooperative behavior in conflicts: A critical review. Speech Monographs, 41, 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (2003). Social interdependence: The interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58(11), 931–945.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (2006). Reaching out: Interpersonal effectiveness and self-actualization (9th edn). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. (2006). Joining together: Group theory and research (9th edn). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1981). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on interethnic interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 454–459.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., & Johnson, D. W. (1982). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning experiences on cross-ethnic interaction and friendships. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1984). The effects of intergroup cooperation and intergroup competition on ingroup and outgroup cross-handicap relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1992). Positive interdependence: Activity manual and guide. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1994). Leading the cooperative school (2nd edn). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th edn). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2002). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2007). Creative controversy: Academic conflict in the classroom (4th edn). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1998a). Cooperation in the classroom (6th edn). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1998b). Advanced cooperative learning (3rd edn). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (2002). Circles of learning (5th edn). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Ortiz, A., & Stanne, M. (1991). Impact of positive goal and resource interdependence on achievement, interaction, and attitudes. Journal of General Psychology, 118(4), 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Roy, P., & Zaidman, B. (1985). Oral interaction in cooperative learning groups: Speaking, listening, and the nature of statements made by high-, medium, and low-achieving students. Journal of Psychology, 119, 303–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Stanne, M., & Garibaldi, A. (1990). The impact of leader and member group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 507–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Noonan, P. (1972). Effects of acceptance and reciprocation of self-disclosures on the development of trust. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(5), 411–416.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Skon, L., & Johnson, R. (1980). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic conditions on children’s problem-solving performance. American Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. (1989). Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 297–313.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N., & Bruun, S. (1981). Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224–231.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N., & Bruun, S. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., & Brewer, M. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044–1057.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, P., & McGlynn, R. (1967). Cooperative versus competitive concept attainment as a function of sex and stimulus display. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(4), 398–402.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986a). Positive interdependence, academic and collaborative-skills group contingencies and isolated students. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 476–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986b). Components of cooperative learning: Effects of collaborative skills and academic group contingencies on achievement and mainstreaming. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 229–239.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui, T., Kakuyama, T., & Onglatco, M. (1987). Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 407–415.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A. (1903). Uber einzel-und gesamtleistung des scholkindes. Archiv fur die Gesamte Psychologie, 1, 276–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, D., Lew, M., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Isolated teenagers, cooperative learning and the training of social skills. Journal of Psychology, 120, 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1988). Impact of positive interdependence and academic group contingencies on achievement. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D., & Brewer, M. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 11–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moede, W. (1927). Die richtlinien der leistungs-psycholgie. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 4, 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B., Coates, G., & Rebbin, T. (1970). The effects of Phlebotomus fever on sustained performance and muscular output. Tech. Rep. No. ITR-70–14. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, Performance Research Laboratory-36697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A. (1966). On being human. New York: Hawthorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naught, G., & Newman, S. (1966). The effect of anxiety on motor steadiness in competitive and non-competitive conditions. Psychonomic Science, 6, 519–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1996). The effect of positive goal and resource interdependence on individual performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 136(2), 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R., Harkins, S., Williams, K., & Latane, B. (1977). The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 575–578.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, T., Davey, M., Alafat, K., Wetherill, K., & Kramer, N. (1980). Informational versus controlling verbal rewards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 228–233.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, J., Rynders, J., Johnson, R., & Johnson, D. W. (1989). Collaborative skills instruction for promoting positive interactions between mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Exceptional Children, 55, 550–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, B., & Eachus, H. (1963). Cooperation and competition in means-interdependent triads. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 307–316.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M., Moore, D., Cotton, J., Cook, M., Hieser, R., Shovar, N., & Gray, M. (1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(4), 626–642.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, L. (1961). Group size, prior experience, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 436–437.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skon, L., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1981). Cooperative peer interaction versus individual competition and individualistic efforts: Effects on the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 83–92.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. (1973). An experimental investigation of the free-rider problem. Social Science Research, 2, 277–292.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (1957). Effects of facilitative role interdependence on group functioning. Human Relations, 10, 347–366.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, E. B. (1889). A three-year study of the physiology of pacing and waiting races. Cited in N. Triplett (1898), The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., & Cullian, L. (1983). Group interaction and achievement in small groups: Stability over time. American Education Research Journal, 20(3), 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt: II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R., & Brehm, J. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. (1981). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., Harkins, S., & Latane, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303–311.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, S., Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., & Snider, B. (1986). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. (2008). Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning: The Teacher's Role. In: Gillies, R.M., Ashman, A.F., Terwel, J. (eds) The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1

Download citation