In information systems (IS) research major problems are discussed in literature, often regarded as crucial for the identity and existence of the discipline itself (Benbasat and Zmud 2003).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applegate LM, King JL (1999) Rigor and relevance: careers on the line. MIS Quarterly 23:17-18.
Banville C, Landry M (1989) Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined? Communica-tions of the ACM 32:48-60.
Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Wiley, Chichester.
Benbasat I, Zmud RW (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance. MIS Quarterly 23:3-16.
Benbasat I, Zmud RW (2003) The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defin-ing and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties. MIS Quarterly 27:183-194.
Boland R (1989) The Experience of System Design: A Hermeneutic of Organiza-tional Action. Scandinavian Journal of Management 5:87-104.
Bostrom R, Heinen JS (1977) MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Per-spective. MIS Quarterly 3.
Brooke C (2002) Critical Perspectives on Information Systems: An Impression of the Research Landscape. Journal of Information Technology 17:271-283.
Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft Systems Methodologies in Action. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Churchman CW (1979) The Systems Approach. Dell, New York/NY.
Darke P, Shanks G, Broadbent M (1998) Successfully completing case study re-search: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal 8:273-289.
Fischer G, Nakakoji K, Ostwaldl J (1995) Supporting the evolution of design arti-facts with representations of context and intent. Symposium on Designing In-teractive Systems archive: Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods & Techniques (DIS 1995), Ann Arbor, MI, pp 7-15.
Galliers RD (1997) Reflections on Information Systems research: twelve points of debate. In: Mingers J, Stowell F (eds). Information Systems Research: An Emerging Discipline. London, pp 141-157.
Heller F (1997) Sociotechnology and the Environment. Human Relations 50:605-624.
Hevner AR, March TS, Park J, Sudha R (2004) Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28:75-105.
Hirschheim R, Newman M (1991) Symbolism and information systems development: Myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research 2:29-62.
Keen PGW (1980) MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradi-tion. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Sys-tems. Philadelphia/PA, pp 9-18.
Knights D, Murray F (1994) Managers Divided. Wiley, Chichester.
Lee AS (2000) Systems Thinking, Design Science, and Paradigms. Heeding Three Lessons from the Past to Resolve Three Dilemmas in the Present to Direkt a Trajectory for Future Research in the Information Systems Field (Keynote Speech). 11th International Conference on Information Management, Kaohsi-ung, Taiwan.
Lyytinen K (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research. MIS Quarterly 23:25-28.
March TS, Smith G (1995) Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15:251-266.
Markus ML, Davenport TH (1999) Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud. MIS Quarterly 23:19-23.
McGrath K (2005) Doing Critical Research in Information Systems: A Case of Theory and Practice Not Informing Each Other. Information Systems Journal 15:85-101.
Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodol-ogy. Information Systems Research 12:240-259.
Mumford E, Weir M (1979) Computer Systems in Work Design - The ETHICS Method. Associated Business Press, London, UK.
Niehaves B (2005) Epistemological Perspectives on Pluralist IS Research. 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg, Germany.
Nunamaker JF, Chen M, Purdin TDM (1991) Systems Development in Informa-tion Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 7:89-106.
Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research 12:121-134.
Rossi M, Sein M (2003) Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Ap-proach. IRIS 2003, Helsinki, Finland.
Scheer A-W (2000) ARIS-Business Process Modeling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Simon H (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Walls J, Widmeyer G, El Sawy O (1992) Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3:36-59.
Weber R (1987) Toward a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Basis for Informa-tion Systems Research. Journal of Information Systems 1:3-19.
Weber R (2003) Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact. MIS Quarterly 27:iii-xi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Janiesch, C. (2007). Socio-Technical Perspectives on Design Science in IS Research. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70801-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70802-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)