Skip to main content

Knowledge and Decision-Making within Software Projects

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Systems Development

The effective use of knowledge results in better decision-making within projects. Moreover, the unpredictable nature of software projects and the need for effective communication within project teams requires a framework for social interaction and feedback that results in better decision-making. This paper analyses the creation and capture of knowledge within software development projects and discusses the central role of decision making in the development process, and how the effective use of knowledge helps improve decision-making. The paper views how the knowledge generated and decisions made within a software project can be provided greater visibility and communicated effectively, and to achieve this, presents a framework to facilitate social interaction and feedback during the development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alavi M and Leidner DE (1999) ‘Knowledge Management Systems: Is-sues, Challenges and Benefits,’ Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol 1, Article 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) (1996), Knowledge Management: Consortium Benchmarking Study Final Report; Available from http://www.store.apqc.org/reports/Summary/know-mng.pdf

  3. Bredillet CN (2004) ‘Projects are Producing the Knowledge which are Producing the Projects……’ Proceedings of IPMA, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Curtis B, Krasner H, and Iscoe N (1988) ‘A Field Study for the Software Design Process for Large Systems,’ Communications of the ACM., Vol 31, No 11, pp 68-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalcher D (2003) Computing Project Management, Middlesex University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dalcher D (2003a) ‘Software Development for Dynamic Systems.’ De- velopments in Metainformatics. LNCS, Springer Verlag, Peter J Nurn- berg (ed): pp 58-75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davenport TH and Prusak L (1998) ‘Working Knowledge,’ Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis RC (1999) ‘The Fundamentals of Top Management,’ New York: Harper and Brothers, 1951, (quoted in Cleland DI. Project Management: Strategic Design and Implementation, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, p-3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dym C L and Little P (2000) ‘Engineering Design: A Project Based Introduction.’ John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, and Neale MA, (1996) ‘Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Infor-mation Distribution Affect Process and Performance,’ Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, Vol 67, pp 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson RA (1993) ‘Negotiation Basics,’ Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koskinen KU (2004) ‘Knowledge Management to Improve Project Communication and Implementation,’ Project Management Journal, Vol 35, No 1, pp 13-19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meredith JR and Mantel JS (1995) ‘Project Management: A Managerial Approach,’ Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Myers W (1985) ‘MCC: Planning the Revolution in Software,’ IEEE Software.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) ‘The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation,’ Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nutt PC (1989) ‘Making Tough Decisions,’ Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Polanyi M (1967) ‘The Tacit Dimension,’ Routledge and Keon Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Politis JD (2003) ‘The Connection between Trust and Knowledge Man- agement: What are its Implications for Team Performance,’ Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 7, No 5, pp 55-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pressman RS(1997)‘Software Engineering- A Practitioner’s Ap- proach,’ The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simon H A (1977) ‘The New Science of Management Decision,’ Pren-tice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walz DB, Elam JJ and Curtis B (1993) ‘Inside a Software Design Team: Knowledge Acquisition, Sharing and Integration,’ Communications of the ACM, Vol 36, No 10, pp 63-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sandhawalia, B., Dalcher, D. (2007). Knowledge and Decision-Making within Software Projects. In: Magyar, G., Knapp, G., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupančič, J. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70761-7_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70761-7_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70760-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70761-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics